Addressing Lake Erie eutrophication: An assessment of recent progress and recommendations

Authors

  • Murray M.W University of Michigan, School for Environment and Sustainability, and Augusta University, Department of Biological Sciences; 2500 Walton Way, Augusta, GA, 30904
  • Livernois J University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1
  • Bratton J.F. LimnoTech, 501 Avis Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108
  • Burrows M. International Joint Commission, Great Lakes Regional Office, 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9A 6T3

Abstract

Addressing eutrophication problems in the Great Lakes was a key motivating factor in the signing of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement by the U.S. and Canadian governments (the “Parties”) in 1972. In spite of progress in the intervening five decades, persistent eutrophication problems – including harmful algal blooms – continue to occur in western Lake Erie and in some embayments of most of the other Great Lakes. In 2020-2022 a work group of the International Joint Commission assessed progress in addressing nutrient loads in Lakes Erie (with a secondary emphasis on Lake Ontario). The project reviewed recent research relevant to addressing ongoing nutrient impacts in Lake Erie, reviewed and assessed progress under domestic action plans developed for Lake Erie, and the status of implementation of recommendations from previous International Joint Commission reports. The research review indicated significant progress in some areas, in particular concerning modeling, but ongoing needs in others, including on approaches to optimize appropriate best management practices at sufficient scales to reduce nutrient export from the land. The Parties' implementation of the Commission's recommendations has been mixed, with setting of targets and multiple modeling efforts on the one hand, but more limited work in other areas, including related to the economics of harmful algal blooms and on manure management. Our assessment of domestic action plans themselves, found both strengths (including in research, monitoring, adaptive management, and watershed-level planning), and limitations (including details on best management practices implementation, approaches to manure management, and funding needs for implementation). We identify multiple recommendations for strengthening programs in both countries, including through increased research addressing multiple aspects of best management practices effectiveness and implementation, consideration of an innovative approach such as group-level incentives to increase best management practices implementation in the agricultural community, and utilization of an accountability framework to advance progress towards meeting Lake Erie nutrient targ

Published

2025-06-16