Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology

Authors

  • J. King Freshwater Research Unit, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
  • D. Louw Environment Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Private Bag X313, Pretoria 0001, South Africa

Keywords:

River ecosystem, Water-resource development, Instream flow requirements, Structured workshop

Abstract

The demand for water from South Africa’s growing population is creating an ever-increasing pressure on the country’s rivers. The urgent need to provide more water services often conflicts with the desire to maintain or improve the ecological condition of the rivers. To provide guidance on the sustainable use of a river’s water-resources, the Building Block Methodology (BBM) has been developed for assessing the instream flow requirement for any river. Development has been done jointly over the last five years by the national Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) and river scientists, and the accent is on identifying a complex of different magnitude flows for maintenance of entire river ecosystems. The BBM caters for the almost universal reality in South Africa of having rapidly to provide scientific guidance on such flows for a river in cases where biological data and understanding of the functioning of the river are limited. However, the methodology works equally well in data-rich situations. The BBM depends on available knowledge and expert opinion, gleaned from experienced river scientists in a structured workshop process. Limited new data of a specific nature are gathered to facilitate the process. Relevant data on the river are prepared in a way that workshop participants can easily understand and quickly begin to use. Scientists typically involved in the workshop, all with specific roles, are those with specialist knowledge of the river or similar rivers in terms of the fish, aquatic invertebrates, riparian vegetation, river importance, habitat integrity, fluvial geomorphology, local hydraulics, water chemistry and social dependence on the riverine ecosystem. Hydrological and hydraulic modelers provide data inputs and facilitate the workshop process by answering questions and producing additional data as requested. The workshop output, reached by consensus, is a quantitative description in space and time of a flow regime that should facilitate maintenance of the river ecosystem in some pre-determined desired future state. Information from a BBM workshop is used by DWAF in the Planning phase of a proposed water-resource development. Further development of the BBM, to extend it into the Design, Construction and Operation phases, has been initiated. This includes linking with a public participation process, input into design of the scheme, base-line studies of the river and subsequent monitoring to assess the efficacy of the recommended flow regime.

References

Arthington, A.L., King, J.M., O’Keeffe, J.H., Bunn, S.E., Day, J.A., Pusey, B.J., Bludhorn, D.R. and Tharme, R.E. 1992. “Development of an holistic approach for assessing environmental water requirements of riverine ecosystems”. In Water allocation for the environment — Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop Armidale, Australia, Edited by: Pigram, J.J. and Hooper, B.P. 69–76. Armidale, , Australia: The Centre for Water Policy Research. In

Arthington, A.L., Pusey, B.J., Bludhorn, D.R., Bunn, S.E. and King, J.M. Holistic Approach for assessing the environmental flow requirements of riverine ecosystems: origins, theory, applications and new developments, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation Report Canberra (in press)

Bruwer, C., ed. 1991. Flow Requirements of Kruger National Park Rivers, Technical Report TR149 Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

Chutter, F.M. and Heath, R.G.M. 1993. Relationships between Low Flows and the River Fauna in the Letaba River, Water Research Commission report 293/1/93 Pretoria

DEA (Department of Environment Affairs). 1992. Integrated Environmental Management Guideline Series, Vol. 1–6, Pretoria: Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism.

DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry). 1991. Water Quality Management Policies and Strategies in the RSA, Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

DWAF. 1992. Water for Managing the Natural Environment, Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Draft Policy Document

DWAF. 1994. Water Supply and Sanitation, Pretoria: White Paper, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

Ferrar, A.A., ed. 1989. Ecological Flow Requirements for South African Rivers, South African National Scientific Programmes Report Number 162 Pretoria: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.

Gan, K.C. and McMahon, T.A. 1990. Variability of results from the use of PHABSIM in estimating habitat area. Regulated Rivers, 5: 233–239.

Gan, K.C. and McMahon, T.A. 1990b. Comparison of two computer models for assessing environmental flow requirements, Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology Report Victoria: University of Melbourne.

Gordon, N.D., McMahon, T.A. and Finlayson, B.L. 1992. Stream hydrology. An introduction for ecologists, Chichester: Wiley.

Hughes, D.A., O’Keeffe, J.H., Smakhtin, V. and King, J. 1997. “Development of an operating rule model to simulate time series of reservoir releases for instream flow requirements”. In Water SA

King, J.M. and O’Keeffe, J.H. 1989. “Looking to the future — South Africa’s requirements”. In Ecological flow requirements for South African rivers, South African National Scientific Programmes Report Number 162 Edited by: Ferrar, A.A. Pretoria: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. In

King, J.M. and Tharme, R.E. 1994. Assessment of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology and initial development of alternative instream flow methodologies for South Africa, Water Research Commission report 295/1/94 Pretoria

Kleynhans, C.J. 1996. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River (Limpopo system, South Africa). Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 5: 41–54.

Louw, M.D. 1995. The ROIP Manual, Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

Louw, M.D. and King, J.M. 1995. Sequence of necessary actions for the determination of instream flow requirements in DWAF, Internal report Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

Mathur, D., Bason, W.H., Purdey, E.J. Jr and Silver, C.A. 1985. A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42: 825–831.

O’Keeffe, J.H. and Coetzee, Y. 1996. Status report on the Kruger National Parks Rivers Research Programme: a synthesis of results and assessment of progress to January 1996, Water Research Commission Report No 711/1/96 Pretoria

O’Keeffe, J.H., Weeks, D.C., Fourie, A. and Davies, B.R. 1996. A pre-impoundment study of the Sabie-Sand river system, Mpumalanga with special reference to predicted impacts on the Kruger National Park. Vol. 3. The effects of proposed impoundments and management recommendations, Water Research Commission Report No 294/3/96 Pretoria

Richardson, B.A. 1986. “Evaluation of instream flow methodologies for freshwater fish in New South Wales”. In Stream protection: the management of rivers for instream uses, Edited by: Campbell, I.C. 143–167. Australia: Water Studies Centre: Chisholm Institute of Technology. In

Rowntree, K.M. and Wadeson, R.A. 1998. A geomorphological framework for the assessment of instream flow requirements. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 1: 125–141.

Scott, D. and Shirvell, C.S. 1987. “A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology and observations on flow determination in New Zealand”. In Regulated streams: advances in ecology, Edited by: Craig, J.F. and Kemper, J.B. 27–43. New York: Plenum Press. In

Shirvell, C.S. 1986. Pitfalls of physical habitat simulation in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1460: 68–68.

Stalnaker C.B. Lamb B.L. Henriksen J. Bovee K.D. Bartholow J. The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: a primer for IFIM National Ecology Research Center, internal publication Fort Collins, CO 1994

Tennant, D.L. 1976. Instream flow regimes for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries, 1(4): 6–10.

Tharme, R.E. 1996. Review of international methodologies for the quantification of the instream flow requirements of rivers, Pretoria: Dept. Water Affairs and Forestry.

Thoms, M.C., Sheldon, F., Roberts, J., Harris, J. and Hillman, T.J. 1996. Scientific panel assessment of environmental flows for the Barwon-Darling River. A report to the Technical Services Division of the New South Wales Department of Land and Water Conservation

Water Research Commission. 1993. Low-flow hydrology. Proceedings of workshop, Pretoria: Water Research Commission.

Weeks, D.C., O’Keeffe, J.H., Fourie, A. and Davies, B.R. 1996. A pre-impoundment study of the Sabie-Sand river system, Mpumalanga with special reference to predicted impacts on the Kruger National Park. Vol. 1. The ecological status of the Sabie-Sand river system, Water Research Commission Report No 294/1/96 Pretoria

Published

1998-01-01