Land use, habitat, and water quality effects on macroinvertebrate communities in three watersheds of a lake michigan associated marsh system
Keywords:
Scale, Wetlands, Streams, Geographic information systemAbstract
Three watersheds within a marsh system draining into Lake Michigan in northwest Indiana, USA, were studied for differences among land use, habitat conditions and water quality to determine their influence on macroinvertebrate community structure. Much of this area had been altered for agricultural, commercial, industrial and residential land uses. Land use, habitat conditions and water quality were significantly different among watersheds. Water quality varied more among streams than within streams. Several variables were related to land use, especially dissolved ions. Macroinvertebrate communities depicted neither a healthy wetland nor a healthy stream system. Some sites were typical of a sand-based, erosional stream system and others were more typical of a wetland system. Communities were different both in and among streams; relationships with water chemistry variables and land use suggested that community structure was a function of local-scale, abiotic factors rather than watershed-scale characteristics. These results show the importance of local-scale influences on the structure and function of macroinvertebrate communities. The development of the methods used to measure these local-scale landscape factors is important to restoration and management.
References
Allan, J.D., Erickson, D.L. and Fay, J. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol., 37: 149–161.
Apfelbaum, S.I., Heiman, K.A. and Prokes, J.A. 1984. Ecological condition and management opportunity for the Great Marsh System, Porter, Indiana: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Applied Ecological Services, Juda, Wisconsin.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1992. “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”. In American Public Health Association, Washington, DC: American Waterworks Association and Water Pollution Control Federation.
Carr, M.R. 1996. Primer User Manual: Plymouth Routines in Multivariate Ecological Research, Bournemouth, , UK: Bourne Press.
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, UK: Natural Environment Research Council.
Conover, W.J. 1971. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, New York: Wiley.
Cummins, K.W., Wilzbach, M.A., Gates, D.M., Perry, J.B. and Taliaferro, W.B. 1989. Shredders and riparian vegetation: leaf litter that falls into streams influences communities of stream invertebrates. Bioscience, 39: 24–30.
Dahl, T.E. and Johnson, C.E. 1991. Wetland status and trends in the conterminous United States, from mid 1970s to mid 1980s, Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Grass Version 4.1 (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System 4.1). 1993. Grass 4.1 Users Reference Manual, Champaign, IL: US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories.
Hardy, M.A. 1984. Chemical and biological quality of streams at the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana, 1978–1980, Indianapolis, IN: US Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations 83-4208.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Gt. Lakes Entomol., 20(1): 31–39.
Johnson, C.A., Detenbeck, N.E. and Niemi, G.J. 1990. The cumulative effect of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity: a landscape approach. Biogeochemistry, 10: 105–141.
Johnson, L.B., Richards, C., Host, G.E. and Arthur, J.W. 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol., 37: 193–208.
Knorr, D.F. and Fairchild, G.W. 1987. Periphyton, benthic invertebrates and fishes as biological indicators of water quality in the East Branch Brandywine Creek. Proc. Pa. Acad. Sci., 61: 61–66.
Krebs, C.J. 1978. Ecology: the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper & Row.
Krieger, K.A. 1992. The ecology of invertebrates in the Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands: current knowledge and research needs. J. Gt. Lakes Res., 18(4): 634–650.
Kunin, W.E. 1998. Extrapolating species abundance across several spatial scales. Science, 281: 1513–1515.
Lenat, D.R. and Crawford, J.K. 1994. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of the North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia, 294: 185–199.
Merritt, R.W. and Cummins, K.W. 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd Edition, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.
Niemi, G.J., Devore, P., Detenbeck, N., Taylor, D., Lima, A., Pastor, J., Yount, J.D. and Naiman, R.J. 1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ. Management, 14: 571–588.
Pedersen, E.R. and Perkins, M.A. 1986. The use of benthic invertebrate data for evaluating impacts of urban runoff. Hydrobiologia, 139: 13–22.
Petersen, R.C. Jr. 1992. The RCE: a riparian, channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape. Freshwater Biol., 27: 295–306.
Pinder, L.C.V., Ladle, M., Gledhill, T., Bass, J.A.B. and Matthews, A.M. 1987. Biological surveillance of water quality: a comparison of macroinvertebrate surveillance methods in relation to assessment of water quality in a chalk stream. Arch. Hydrobiol., 109: 207–226.
Plafkin, J.L., Barbour, M.T., Porter, K.D., Gross, S.K. and Hughes, R.M. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Assessment and Watershed Protection Division. EPA/440/4-89/001
Pratt, J.M. and Coler, R.A. 1976. A procedure for the routine biological evaluation of urban runoff in small rivers. Water Resour. Bull., 10: 1019–1025.
Resh, V.H. 1979. “Biomonitoring, species diversity indices, and taxonomy”. In Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, Edited by: Grasslie, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. 241–253. Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House. In
Richards, C. and Host, G.E. 1994. Examining land use influences on stream habitats and macroinvertebrates: a GIS approach. Water Resour. Bull., 30(4): 729–738.
Richards, C., Host, G.E. and Arthur, J.W. 1993. Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biol., 29: 285–294.
Richards, C., Johnson, L.B. and Host, G.E. 1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53: 295–311.
Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V.R. 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, New York: Chapman & Hall.
Shedlock, R.J., Cohen, D.A., Imbrigiotta, T.E. and Thompson, T.A. 1994. Hydrogeology and hydrogeochemistry of dunes and wetlands along the southern shore of Lake Michigan, Indiana, US Geological Survey Open File Report 92-139 Indianapolis, IN
Stewart, P.M. and Robertson, D.J. 1992. Aquatic organisms as pollution indicators of water quality in suburban streams of the Lower Delaware River Region. USA. Proc. Pa. Acad. Sci., 66: 135–141.
Stewart, P.M., Butcher, J.T. and Becker, M.E. 1997. Ecological assessment of the three creeks draining the Great Marsh at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Porter, IN: U.S. Geological Survey.
Stewart, P.M., Butcher, J.T. and Gerovac, P.V. 1999. Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use. Nat. Areas J., 19(2): 155–165.
Wilhm, J.L. and Dorris, T.C. 1968. Biological parameters for water quality criteria. Bioscience, 18: 477–481.
Wilkins, D.C. and Jackson, R.W. 1984. Nonpoint water quality contributions from land use. J. Environ. Sys., 13(2): 127–136.
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
