Benthic algae as bioindicators of agricultural pollution in the streams and rivers of southern Québec (Canada)

Authors

  • Isabelle Lavoie Département de biologie, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4 Canada
  • Warwick F. Vincent Département de biologie, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4 Canada
  • Reinhard Pienitz Centre d’Études Nordiques, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4 Canada
  • Jean Painchaud Direction du suivi de l’état de l’environnement, ministère de l’Environnement du Québec, 675 René-Lévesque est, Québec, G1R 5V7, Canada

Keywords:

artificial substrates, land use, multivariate analyses, nutrients, periphyton, water quality

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of agricultural pollution on periphyton in streams and rivers of southern Québec. We sampled benthic algae incubated from mid-July to mid-August on artificial substrates at 29 sites and analysed the variations in community structure and total community biomass. Diatom community structure as well as total benthic algae community were analysed. Water samples were taken to provide background chemical information, and land use data were also obtained. Preliminary tests showed that colonisation of the artificial substrates (unglazed ceramic tiles) resulted in biomass levels (Chlorophyll a and ash-free dry weight) and species composition that were not statistically different from those on natural rock substrates. The canonical correspondence analyses showed that pH, conductivity and suspended solids were the most significant environmental variables accounting for variations among sites and diatom community structure. No additional resolving power was obtained by including cyanobacteria, green algae and flagellates. This total community analysis substantially increased variance and sample processing time while reducing the relationship with environmental variables. These results indicate that an analysis based exclusively on diatoms provided the optimal approach. Traditional nutrient measurements (phosphorus and nitrogen) did not explain a significant part of the variance in the species composition among sites. The ordination analyses clearly separated agriculturally-impacted streams from reference sites, but no significant grouping was observed related to the intensity and type of agriculture, indicating the greater importance of local farming practices. The use of periphyton as a bioindicator provides an integrated measurement of water quality as experienced by the aquatic biota, and therefore offers a useful addition to physico-chemical water quality monitoring strategies.

References

Aloi, J. 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. C. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47: 656–670.

Belore, M., Winter, J. and Duthie, H. 2002. Use of diatoms and macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of water quality in Southern Ontario rivers. Can. Wat. Res. J., 27: 457–484.

Biggs, B. 1990. Periphyton communities and their environments in New Zealand riverse. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 24: 367–386.

Biggs, B., Goring, D. and Nikora, V. 1998a. Subsidy and stress responses of stream periphyton to gradients in water velocity as a function of community growth form. J. Phycolxyr., 34: 598–607.

Biggs, B., Stevenson, R. and Lowe, R. 1998b. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Archiv für Hydrobiol., 143: 21–56.

Biggs, B., Smith, R. and Duncan, M. 1999. Velocity and sediment disturbance of periphyton in headwater streams, biomass and metabolism. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc., 18: 222–241.

Bourrelly, P. 1966a. Les Algues d’Eau Douce, Initiation à la Systématique, Paris: Tome I: Les Algues Vertes. Éditions N. Boubée et Cie.

Bourrelly, P., 1966b. Les Algues d’Eau Douce, Initiation à la Systématique. Tome II: Les Algues Jaunes et Brunes. Éditions N. Boubée et Cie, Paris.

Bourrelly, P., 1970. Les Algues d’Eau Douce, Initiation à la Systématique. Tome III: Les Algues Bleues et Rouges. Éditions N. Boubée et Cie, Paris.

Cattaneo, C. and Amireault, M. 1992. How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc, 11: 244–356.

Cattaneo, C., Legendre, P. and Niyonsenga, T. 1993. Exploring periphyton unpredictability. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc, 12: 418–430.

Correll, D. 1998. The role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: A review. J. Environ. Qual, 27: 261–266.

Coste, M., 1982. ÉEtude des méthodes biologiques d’appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Q. E. Lyon A. F. Bassin Rhône-Méditéranée-Corse, CEMAGREF

Ellis, R., Neish, B., Trett, M., Best, J., Weightman, A., Morgan, P. and Fry, J. 2001. Comparison of usefulness of three types of artificial substrata (glass, wood and plastic) when studying settlement patterns of periphyton in lakes of different trophic status. J. Microbiol. Meth., 45: 167–170.

Eulin, A. and Le Cohu, R. 1998. Epilithic diatom communities during the colonization of artificial substrates in the River Garonne (France). Comparison with the natural communities. Archiv für Hydrobiol., 143: 79–106.

Fallu, M.–A. and Pienitz, R. 1999. Lacustrine diatoms from Jamesie–Hudsonie (Quebec) and reconstituted model of dissolved organic carbon. Ecoscience, 6: 603–620.

Findlay, D., Kling, H., 1979a. A species list and pictoral reference to the phytoplankton of central and northern Canada-Part I. Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Report No. 1503, Manitoba.

Findlay, D., Kling, H., 1979b. A species list and pictoral reference to the phytoplankton of central and northern Canada-Part II. Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Report No. 1503, Manitoba.

Goltermann, H. 1971. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters.IBP Handbook no. 8, Edited by: Goltermann, H. Blackwell Scientific.

Hébert, S., 1999. Qualité des eaux du fleuve St-Laurent, 1990–1997. Ministère de l’Environnement, Direction des écosystèmes aquatiques. Québec. 38 pp and 4 appendices.

Hill, B., Herlihy, A., Kaufmann, P., Stevenson, R., McCormick, F. and Johnson, C. 2000. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc., 19: 50–67.

Hillebrand, H., Dürselen, C.–D., Kirschtel, D., Pollingher, U. and Zohary, T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol., 35: 403–424.

Kelly, M. and Whitton, B. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: A new index for monitoring eutrophisation in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7: 433–444.

Kirschtel, D. 1993. BIOVOL Program. Dept. Bot., Marsh LifeScience Building, Burlington, VT, U.S.A: Univ. Vermont.

Krammer, K. and Lange–Bertalot, H. 1986. “Bacillariophyceae.1 Teil: Naviculaceae”. In Süβ wasserflora von Mittleuropa, Edited by: Ettl, H., Gärtner, G., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H. and Mollenhauer, D. Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Band 2/1

Krammer, K. and Lange–Bertalot, H. 1988. “Bacillariophyceae.2 Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae”. In Süβ wasserflora von Mittleuropa, Edited by: Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H. and Mollenhauer, D. Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Band 2/2

Krammer, K. and Lange–Bertalot, H. 1991a. “Bacillariophyceae.3 Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae”. In Süβ wasserflora von Mittleuropa, Edited by: Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H. and Mollenhauer, D. Stuttgart, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Band 2/3

Krammer, K. and Lange–Bertalot, H. 1991b. “Bacillariophyceae.4 Teil: Achnanthaceae Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae und Gomphonema)”. In Süβ wasserflora von MittleuropA, Edited by: Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H. and Mollenhauer, D. Jena, Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Band 2/4

Kutka, F. and Richards, C. 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc., 15: 469–480.

Lavoie, I., Vincent, W., Pienitz, R. and Painchaud, J. 2003. Effet du débit sur la dynamique temporelle des algues périphytiques dans une rivière influencée par les activités agricoles. Rev. des Sci. de l’Eau, 16: 55–77.

Leland, H. and Porter, S. 2000. Distribution of benthic algal in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use. Freshwat. Biol, 44: 279–301.

Lenoir, A. and Coste, M. 1996. “Development of a practical diatomic index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board Network”. In Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II, Edited by: Whitton, B. A. and Rott, E. pp. 29–43. Austria: Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck.

Lovejoy, C., Vincent, W., Frenette, J.–J. and Dodson, J. 1993. Microbial gradients in a turbid estuary: Application of a new method for protozoan community analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr, 38: 1295–1303.

Lowe, R. and Pan, Y. 1996. “Benthic algal communities as biological monitors”. In Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Edited by: Bothwell, M. L. and Lowe, R. L. pp. 705–739. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mattila, J. and Raeisaenen, R. 1998. Periphyton growth as an indicator of eutrophication; an experimental approach. Hydrobiologia, 377: 15–23.

McCormick, P. and Stevenson, R. 1998. Periphyton as a tool for ecological assessment and management in the Florida Everglades. J. Phycol, 34: 726–733.

Montgomery, D. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments , 5th edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mosisch, T., Bunn, S., Davies, P. and Marshall, C. 1999. Effects of shade and nutrient manipulation on periphyton growth in a subtropical stream. Aquat. Bot., 64: 167–177.

Mosisch, T., Bunn, S. and Davies, P. 2001. The relative importance of shading and nutrients on algal production in subtropical streams. Freshwat. Biol., 46: 1269–1278.

Munn, M., Black, R. and Gruber, S. 2002. Response of benthic algae to environmental gradients in an agriculturally dominated landscape. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc., 21: 221–237.

Nusch, E., 1980. Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Ergebn. Limnol. 14, 14–36.

Painchaud, J., 1997. La qualité de l’eau des rivières du Québec: état et tendances. Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Faune, Direction des écosystèmes aquatiques.

Pan, Y., Stevenson, R., Hill, B., Herlihy, A. and Collins, G. 1996. Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: A regional assessment. J. N. Am. Benth. Soc., 15: 481–495.

Pienitz, R., Smol, J. and Birks, H. 1995. Assessment of freshwater diatoms as quantitative indicators of pas climate change in the Yukon and Northwest Territories, Canada. J. Paleolim., 13: 21–49.

Potapova, M. and Charles, D. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwat. Biol., 48: 1311–1328.

Prescott, G. 1970. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co. Publishers.

Prygiel, J. and Coste, M. 1993. Utilisation des indices diatomiques pour la mesure de la qualité des eaux du bassin Artois–Picardie: Bilan et perspectives. Ann. Limnol., 29: 255–267.

Reavie, E. and Smol, J. 1998. Epilithic diatoms of the St. Lawrence River and their relationships to water quality. Can. J. Bot., 76: 251–257.

Rott, E., Duthie, H. and Pipp, E. 1998. Monitoring organic pollution and eutrophication in the Grand River, Ontario, by means of diatoms. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55: 1443–1453.

Scheffé, H. 1959. The Analysis of Variance, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Skinner, J., Lewis, K., Bardon, K., Tucker, P., Catt, J. and Chambers, B. 1997. An overview of the environmental impact of agriculture in the U. K.. J. Environ. Manage., 50: 111–128.

Sládeček, V. 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 14: 555–566.

Smith, G. 1950. The Fresh–Water Algae of the United States , 2nd edition, New York: McGraw–Hill Book Co. Inc.

Steinberg, C. and Schiefele, S. 1988. Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters. Z. Wasser–Abwasser–Forsch, 21: 227–234.

ter Braak, C. and ŝmilauer, P. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4), Ithaca, NY, USA: Microcomputer Power.

Tuchman, M. and Stevenson, J. 1980. Comparison of clay tile, sterilized rock and natural substrate diatom communities in a small stream in southeastern Michigan, USA. Hydrobiologia, 75: 73–79.

Vis, C., Cattaneo, A. and Pinel–Alloul, B. 1998. Periphyton as an indicator of water quality in the St. Lawrence River (Quebec, Canada). Environm. Pollu., 101: 13–24.

Wetzel, R. 2002. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems , Third edition, New York: Academic Press.

Winter, J and Duthie, H. 2000a. Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. J. North Am. Benth. Soc., 19: 32–49.

Winter, J. and Duthie, H. 2000b. Stream biomonitoring at an agricultural test site using benthic algae. Can. J. Bot., 78: 1319–1325.

Winter, J. and Duthie, H. 2000c. Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: Habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquat. Ecol., 34: 345–353.

Winter, J. and Duthie, H. 2001. Relating benthic diatom community structure to nutrient loads and water quality in Southern Ontario streams. Verhand. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 27: 3902–3906.

Wunsam, S., Cattaneo, A. and Bourassa, N. 2002. Comparing diatoms species, genera and size in biomonitoring: A case study from streams in the Laurentians (Québec, Canada). Freshwat. Biol., 47: 325–340.

Published

2004-01-01

Issue

Section

Research article