Influence of habitat, water quality, and land use on macro-invertebrate and fish assemblages of a southeastern coastal plain watershed, USA
Keywords:
multivariate, instream habitat, land useAbstract
Most states in the U.S. are currently developing methods for assessing the integrity of aquatic habitats through the development of regional biocriteria. While multimetric indices have been used to show community composition, pollution tolerance, species diversity, and trophic structure with a combined index, the specific environmental factors that drive biological communities may be better explained through the use of multivariate statistical techniques. Macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages were sampled along with water quality, landuse and qualitative and quantitative habitat assessments from forty-nine sites throughout the Choctawhatchee-Pea, a southeastern U.S. watershed. Multivariate statistical analyses of habitat, water quality, and land-use data were used to determine the relationship between environmental variables and the dependent biological variables, macroinvertebrate and fish community structure. Sampling of biological and environmental data showed that there was a great deal of homogeneity within the watershed, which complicated the task of identifying environmental influences on biological assemblages. Macro-invertebrate and fish assemblages of the Choctawhatchee-Pea watershed were similar in their response to environmental conditions with water chemistry having the greatest relationship to macro-invertebrate and fish community structure followed by instream habitat and land use.
References
Allen, J. D., Erickson, D. L. and Fayy, J. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology, 37: 149–161.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1992. “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”. In American Public Health Association , 18th Edition, Washington, DC: American Waterworks Association and Water Pollution Control Federation.
Barbour, M. T. and Stribling, J. B. 1994. “A technique for assessing stream habitat structure”. In Proceedings of the Conference: Riparian Ecosystems of the Humid United States: Function, Values, and Management, Washington, DC: National Association of Conservation Districts.
Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. and Stribling, J. B. 1999. EPA's Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers, Washington, DC.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water 4503F.
Berkman, H. E. and Rabeni, C. F. 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 18(4): 285–294.
Cairns, J. Jr. 1992. Paradigms flossed: The coming of age of environmental toxicology. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 11: 285–287.
Carlisle, D. M., Stewart, P. M. and Butcher, J. T. 2003. “Macroinvertebrate assemblages associated with patterns in land use and water quality”. In Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities, Edited by: Simon, T. P. pp. 251–270. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18: 117–143.
Cook, M. R. and Neil, P. 2000. Implementation assessment for water resource availability, protection, and utilization for the Choctawhatchee, Pea, and Yellow Rivers watersheds: Surface water and biological resources, Tuscaloosa, AL: Geological Survey of Alabama. Report to the Choctawhatchee, Pea, and Yellow Rivers Watershed Management Authority
Dyer, S. D., White-Hull, C. E., Wang, X., Johnson, T. D. and Carr, G. J. 1998. Determining the influence of habitat and chemical factors on instream biotic integrity for a southern Ohio watershed. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recov., 6: 91–110.
Fajen, O. F. and Layzer, J. B. 1993. “Agricultural Practices”. In Impacts on Warmwater Streams: Guidelines for Evaluation, Edited by: Bryan, C. F. and Rutherford, D. A. pp. 257–267. Little Rock, Arkansas: Southern Division, American Fisheries Society.
Fausch, K. D., Lyons, J., Karr, J. Jr. and Angermeier, P. L. 1990. Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 8: 123–144.
Harding, J. S., Benfield, E. F., Bolstad, P. V., Helfman, G. S. and Jones, E. B. D. III. 1998. Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 95: 14843–14847. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9843977http://www4.infotrieve.com/newmedline/detail.asp?NameID=9843977&Session=&searchQuery=Proc%2E+Nat%2E+Acad%2E+Sci%2E%5BJournal+Name%5D+AND+95%5BVolume%5D+AND+14843%5BPage+Number%5D+AND+1998%5BPublication+Date%5D+AND+Harding%5BAuthor+Name%5D&count=1
Henley, W. F., Patterson, M. A., Neves, R. J. and Lemly, A. D. 2000. Effects of sedimentation and turbidity on lotic food webs: A concise review for natural resource managers. Rev. Fish. Sci., 8(2): 125–139.
Karr, J. R. Jr. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6(6): 21–27.
Kaufmann, P. R., Levine, P., Robinson, E. G., Seeliger, C. and Peck, D. V. 1999. Quantifying Physical Habitat in Wadeable Streams, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA 620/R-99/003
Mettee, M. F., O'Neil, P. E. and Pierson, J. M. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin, Tuscaloosa, Alabama: Geological Survey of Alabama. Monograph 15
Morris, C. C., Sawyer, J. A. IV, Bennett, H. H. and Robinson, C. D. 2003. “Effects of sediment quantity on the health of aquatic ecosystems: A case study on depth of fines in coastal plain streams in Alabama”. In Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities, Edited by: Simon, T. P. pp. 113–124. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Petersen, R. C. Jr., Madsen, B. L., Wilzbach, M. A., Magadza, C. H. D., Paarlberg, A., Kullberg, A. and Cummins, K. W. 1987. Stream management: Emerging global similarities. Ambio, 16(4): 166–179.
Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K. and Hughes, R. M. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards. EPA 440–4-89–001
Rabeni, C. F. 2000. Evaluating physical habitat in relation to the biological potential of streams. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 245–256.
Rankin, E. T. 1989. The qualitative habitat evaluation index [QHEI]: Rationale, methods, and application, Columbus, OH: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Assessment Section, Division of Water Quality and Assessment.
Rankin, E. T. 1995. “Habitat indices in water resource quality assessment”. In Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Edited by: Davis, W. S. and Simon, T. P. pp. 181–208. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Richards, C., Host, G. E. and Arthur, J. W. 1993. Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwat. Biol., 29: 285–294.
Richards, C., Haro, R. J., Johnson, L. B. and Host, G. E. 1997. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwat. Biol., 37: 219–230.
Schleiger, S. L. 2000. Use of an index of biotic integrity to detect effects of land use on stream fish communities in west-central Georgia. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 129: 1118–1133.
Simon, T. P. and Stewart, P. M. 1999. Structure and function of fish communities in the Lower Lake Michigan drainage with emphasis on restoration of native fish communities. Natur. Areas J., 19(2): 142–154.
Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 38: 913–920.
Stewart, P. M. and Swinford, T. O. 1995. “Identification of sediment and nutrient sources impacting critically endangered mussel species' habitat in a small agricultural stream”. In Making Environmental Science: A Festschrift in honor of John Cairns, Jr., Edited by: Pratt, J. R., Bowers, N. and Stauffer, J. R. pp. 45–64. Portland, OR: ECOPRINT.
Stewart, P. M., Butcher, J. T. and Gerovac, P. V. 1999. Diatom (Bacillariophyta) community response to water quality and land use. Natur. Areas J., 19(2): 155–165.
Stewart, P. M., Butcher, J. T. and Swinford, T. O. 2000. Land use, habitat, and water quality effects on macroinvertebrate communities in three watersheds of a Lake Michigan associated marsh system. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage., 3: 179–189.
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. and Cushing, C. E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37: 130–137.
Warren, M. L., Burr, B. M. Jr., Walsh, S. J., Bart, H. L., Cashner, R. C., Etnier, D. A., Freeman, B. J., Kuhajda, B. R., Mayden, R. L., Robison, H. W., Ross, S. T. and Sarnes, W. C. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southeastern United States. Fisheries, 25(10): 7–29.
Waters, T. F. 1995. Sediment in streams: Sources, biological effects, and control. Am. Fish. Soc. Monogr., 7
Wang, L., Lyons, J. and Kanehl, P. 1997a. Development of watershed indicators for northern Wisconsin streams: Habitat sampling protocol, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Wang, L., Lyons, J., Kanehl, P. and Gatti, R. 1997b. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity inWisconsin streams. Fisheries, 22(6): 6–12.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
