Burrowing mayflies as indicators of ecosystem health: Status of populations in two western Lake Superior embayments
Keywords:
Hexagenia , Great Lakes, Area of Concern, monitoringAbstract
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada are supporting the development of indicators of ecosystem health that can be used to report on progress in restoring and maintaining the Great Lakes ecosystem, as called for in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement between the United States and Canada. One indicator under development for Great Lakes mesotrophic environments is based on burrowing mayflies (Hexagenia: Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). In this paper, we report the results of a benthic survey in spring 2002 to determine the status of nymphal populations of Hexagenia in two western Lake Superior embayments, the St. Louis River estuary, an area with significant water-use impairments, and Chequamegon Bay, an area with no known water-use impairments. Ponar grab samples collected throughout these embayments showed nymphs were generally abundant in finely particulate, cohesive substrate (clay or mixtures of clay and sand) in both embayments. However, in the St. Louis River estuary nymphs were absent in those preferred substrates at 11 stations in the eastern portion of St. Louis Bay and the adjoining northwestern portion of the Duluth-Superior Harbor, where the sediments were variously contaminated with visible amounts of taconite pellets, paint chips, oil, or combusted coal waste (clinkers). Our results suggest that human activities have rendered those portions of the St. Louis River estuary unsuitable for habitation by Hexagenia nymphs and we recommend that trend monitoring of the nymphal population there be conducted to permit reporting on progress in restoring and maintaining the health and integrity of this Great Lakes ecosystem embayment, consistent with the intent of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
References
Breneman, D., Richards, C. and Lozano, S. 2000. Environmental influences on benthic community structure in a Great Lakes embayment. J. Great Lakes Res., 26: 287–304.
EC and EPA (Environment Canada and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. State of Great Lakes 2001 Toronto and Chicago ISBN 0–662-30488–8, EPA 905-R-01–003. Cat. No. EN40–11/35–2001E
Edsall, T. A. 2001. Burrowing mayflies (Hexagenia) as indicators of ecosystem health. Aquat. Ecosys. Health Manage., 4: 283–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F146349801753509186
GLWQA (Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement). 1989. Revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978 with annexes and terms of reference between the United States and Canada, signed at Ottawa November 22, 1978, and phosphorus load reduction supplement, signed October 16, 1983, as amended by protocol, signed November 18, 1987, Washington, D.C. and Ottawa: International Joint Commission, United States and Canada.
Hunt, B. P. 1953. The life history and economic importance of a burrowing mayfly, Hexagenia limbata, in southern Michigan lakes. Bull. Inst. Fish. Res., 4 Michigan. Department of Conservation, Ann Arbor
IJC (International Joint Commission). 1985. 1985 report on Great Lakes water quality, Washington, D.C. and Ottawa: Great Lakes Water Quality Board Report to the IJC.
Swanson, T. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation of macroinvertebrates in the St. Louis River estuary: food available for benthophagus fishes, Duluth, MN: University of Minnesota-Duluth. M.S. thesis
Wright, L. L. and Mattice, J. S. 1981. Effects of temperature on adult size and emergence success of Hexagenia bilineata under laboratory conditions. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 1: 27–39.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.