Role of upper mixed layer depth in forecasting contaminated sediment recovery rates
Keywords:
PCBs, contaminant fate and transport modeling, remediation, natural attenuationAbstract
A critical step in evaluating and selecting contaminated sediment remediation options is the simulation of a long-term future trend of exposure concentrations that will occur under natural conditions without active in situ remediation. This ‘natural attenuation’ forecast provides a baseline reference against which to compare alternative sediment management options. Model development and application at a number of contaminated sediment sites has indicated that one of the most important parameters for accurately simulating natural attenuation is the depth of the upper mixed (i.e., ‘active’) sediment layer. The upper mixed sediment layer essentially acts as a biologically available contaminant reservoir, determining risks to ecological and human health. Contaminant concentrations in the upper mixed sediment layer are dynamic and determined by: the sediment inventory created by historical loadings to the sediment; a balance of fate and transport processes both into and out of the mixed layer at the sediment water interface; and burial of contaminants from the mixed layer into deeply buried ‘inactive’ sediments. Model sensitivity analyses at one of our sediment management sites, the Lower Fox River, has demonstrated that the rate at which polychlorinated biphenyl exposure decreases with time under natural processes is inversely proportional and very sensitive to the depth of mixing in the surficial sediments of the system. These studies have shown that increasing the assumed mixed layer depth in the model from 10 cm to 30 cm increases the simulated recovery half-time—as measured by the rate of change of the upper layer sediment polychlorinated biphenyl concentration—from about 20 years to more than 100 years. In the case of the Lower Fox River, radioisotope and polychlorinated biphenyl concentration depth profiling supports a 10 cm mixed depth layer. Implementing a 30 cm mixed depth in the model smears the existing polychlorinated biphenyl profile, artificially mixing higher concentrations in the 10 to 30 cm layer with lower concentrations in the 0 to 10 cm layer, resulting in the increased simulated recovery times.
References
Ambrose, R. B. Jr., Wool, T. A., Connolly, J. P. and Schanz, R. W. 1988. “WASP4, A Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model—Model Theory, User's Manual, and Programmer's Guide.”, Athens, Georgia: Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, USEPA.
Ambrose, R. B. Jr., Wool, T. A. and Martin, J. L. 1993. “The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5—Part A: Model Documentation.”, Athens, Georgia: Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, USEPA. URL: http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/wasp/
Boudreau, B. P. 1994. Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation?. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58(4): 1243–1249.
Boudreau, B. P. 1998. Mean mixed depth of sediments: The wherefore and the why. Limnol. Oceanol., 43(3): 524
Chan, K. S. and Bentley, S. J. Results of Geochronological Analyses of Anacostia River Multicores. Radiochemistry Analysis Summary Report. February 17. Louisiana State University Coastal Studies Institute. URL: http://www.hsrc-ssw.org/anacostia/ radiochemistry.pdf
Integrated Paper Services, Inc., June 29, 1990. A Macroinvertebrate Study of the Depositional “Soft” Substrates of the Lower Fox River, Wisconsin—1988. Project 5015: Monitoring Study Series Report No. 3. Appleton, Wisconsin
Integrated Paper Services, Inc., August 1, 2000. A Macroinvertebrate Study of the Depositional “Soft” Substrates of the Lower Fox River, Wisconsin—1999. Project 5015: Monitoring Study Series Report No. 4. Appleton, Wisconsin
LTI (Limno-Tech, Inc.), 2002a. Modeling Analysis of PCB Transport for the Lower Fox River. Ann Arbor, Michigan. January, 2002. URL: http://www.limno.com (http://www.limno.com)
LTI, 2002b. Measurement of Burial Rates and Mixing Depths Using High Resolution Radioisotope Cores in the Lower Fox River. Ann Arbor, Michigan. January, 2002. URL: http:// www.limno.com (http:// www.limno.com)
Matisoff, G. and Wang, X. 2000. Particle Mixing by Freshwater Infaunal Bioirrigators: Midges (Chironomidae: Diptera) and Mayflies (Ephemeridae: Ephemeroptera). J. Great Lakes Res., 26(2): 174–182. [CSA]
McCall, P. L. and Tevesz, M. J. S. 1982. “The effects of benthos on physical properties of freshwater sediments”. In Animal-Sediment Relations, Edited by: McCall, P. L. and Tevesz, M. J. S. 105–176. New York: Plenum.
NRC (National Research Council, a Division of the National Academies), 2001. A Risk Management Strategy for PCB-Contaminated Sediments. National Academy Press. Washington, DC
Thoms, S. R., Matisoff, G., McCall, P. L. and Wang, X. 1995. Models for Alteration of Sediments by Benthic Organisms, Project 92-NPS-2 Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation.
WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources), 1999. Technical Memorandum 2e: Estimation of Lower Fox River Sediment Bed Properties. Madison, Wisconsin
Wolfe, J. R., DePinto, J. V. and Toledo, J. 2001. The life cycle of a contaminated sediment site. Great Lakes Sci. Law Policy, 3(1): 1–18.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
