Biodiversity and aquatic ecosystem functioning: A mini-review
Keywords:
aquatic ecosystem, biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, spatial scaleAbstract
Ecosystem functioning depends on multiple interactions among physical, chemical and biological factors. Indeed, ecosystem processes (e.g., productivity and nutrient recycling) result directly from the diversity of functional traits in biotic communities, which in turn are determined by species composition and diversity. Species diversity results both from biotic introductions and from environmental pressures. As a result, changes in biodiversity in response to environmental selection pressures tend to have a direct impact on ecosystem processes. The relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning have been the focus of numerous research studies for several years. Based on these studies, it appears that a low level of biodiversity allows an ecosystem to function effectively under constant conditions, but that greater biodiversity is called for in fluctuating environments. In this paper, we outline the concepts underlying the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and illustrate these concepts with examples from aquatic ecosystems. The importance of spatial scale will also be considered.
References
Bellwood, D. R., Hoey, A. S. and Choat, J. H. 2003. Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Ecol. Lett., 6: 281–285. [CSA]
Bengtsson, J., Engelhardt, K., Giller, P., Hobbie, S., Lawrence, D., Levine, J., Vilà, M. and Wolters, V. 2002. “Slippin' and slidin' between the scales: the scaling components of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relations”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 209–220. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
Bengtsson, J., Angelstam, P., Elmqvist, T., Emanuelsson, U., Folke, C., Ihse, M., Moberg, F. and Nyström, M. 2003. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio, 32: 389–396. [CSA]
Cardinale, B. J., Palmer, M. A. and Collins, S. L. 2002. Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature, 415: 426–429. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Carr, M. H., Anderson, T. W. and Hixon, M. A. 2002. Biodiversity, population regulation, and the stability of coral-reef fish communities. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 11241–11245. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Case, T. J. 1990. Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 9610–9614. [CSA]
Chapin, F. S. III, Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C. and Diaz, S. 2001. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405: 234–242. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Chase, J. M. and Leibold, M. A. 2003. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature, 416: 427–430. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Dodson, S. I., Arnott, S. E. and Cottingham, K. L. 2000. The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology, 81: 2662–2679. [CSA]
Dorigo, U., Jacquet, S. and Humbert, J.-F. 2004. Cyanophage diversity inferred from g20 gene analysis in the largest natural French lakes, Lake Bourget (France). Appl. Environ. Microb., 70: 1017–1022. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Elliott, J. A., Irish, A. E. and Reynolds, C. S. 2001. The effects of vertical mixing on a phytoplankton community: a modelling approach to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Fresh. Biol., 46: 1291–1297. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Emmerson, M. C., Solan, M., Emes, C., Paterson, D. M. and Raffaelli, D. 2001. Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature, 411: 73–77. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Fukami, T. and Morin, P. J. 2003. Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature, 424: 423–426. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Gessner, M. O., Inchausti, P., Persson, L., Raffaelli, D. G. and Giller, P. S. 2004. Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: insights from aquatic systems. Oïkos, 104: 419–422. [CSA]
Giller, P. S., Hillebrand, H., Berninger, U. G., Gessner, M. O., Hawkins, S., Inchausti, P., Inglis, C., Leslie, H., Malmqvist, B., Monaghan, M. T., Morin, P. J. and O'Mullan, G. 2004. Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments. Oïkos, 104: 423–426. [CSA]
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J., Harris, R., Högberg, P., Huss-Danell, K., Joshi, J., Jumpponen, A., Körner, C., Leadley, P. W., Loreau, M., Minns, A., Mulder, C. P. H., O'Donovan, G., Otway, S. J., Pereira, J. S., Prinz, A., Read, D. J., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schulze, E.-D., Siamantziouras, A.-S. D., Spehn, E. M., Terry, A. C., Troumbis, A. Y., Woodward, F. Y., Yachi, S. and Lawton, J. H. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286: 1123–1127. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Hooper, D. U., Solan, M., Symstad, A., Diaz, S., Gessner, M. O., Buchmann, N., Degrange, V., Grime, P., Hulot, F., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Roy, J., Spehn, E. and van Peer, L. 2002. “Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 195–208. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Horner-Devine, M. C., Leibold, M. A., Smith, V. H. and Bohannan, J. M. 2003. Bacterial diversity patterns along a gradient of primary productivity. Ecol. Lett., 6: 613–622. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Hulot, F. D., Lacroix, G., Lescher-Moutoué, F. and Loreau, M. 2000. Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Nature, 405: 340–344. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Huston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 110: 449–460. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Huston, M. A. and McBride, A. C. 2002. “Evaluating the relative strengths of biotic versus abiotic controls on ecosystem processes”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 47–60. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
Hutchinson, G. E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat., 95: 137–145. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Huysman, J., Jonker, R. R., Zonneveld, C. and Weissing, F. J. 1999. Competition for light between phytoplankton species: experimental tests of mechanistic theory. Ecology, 80: 211–222. [CSA]
Huysman, J., Johansson, A. M., Folmer, E. O. and Weissing, F. J. 2001. Towards a solution of the plankton paradox: the importance of physiology and life history. Ecol. Lett., 4: 408–411. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Interlandi, S. J. and Kilham, S. S. 2001. Limiting resources and the regulation of diversity in phytoplankton communities. Ecology, 82: 1270–1282. [CSA]
Kennedy, T. A., Naeem, S., Howe, K. M., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D. and Reich, P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature, 417: 636–638. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Levine, J. M., Kennedy, T. and Naeem, S. 2002. “Neighbourhood scale effects of species diversity on biological invasions and their relationship to community patterns”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 114–124. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
Loreau, M. 1998. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 5632–5636. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J. P., Hector, A., Hooper, D. U., Huston, M. A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D. and Wardle, D. A. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294: 804–808. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P., eds. 2002a. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning-Synthesis and Perspectives, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 2002b. “Perspectives and challenges”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 237–242. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
Loreau, M., Mouquet, N. and Gonzalez, A. 2003. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 100: 13765–12770. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Martinez, N. D. 1996. “Defining and measuring functional aspects of biodiversity”. In Biodiversity - A Biology of Numbers and Differences, Edited by: Gaston, K. J. 114–118. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
MacArthur, R. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36: 533–536. [CSA]
McCann, K. S. 2000. The diversity - stability debate. Nature, 405: 228–233. [CROSSREF][CSA]
McCann, K. S., Hastings, A. and Huxel, G. R. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395: 794–798. [CROSSREF][CSA]
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M. and Morin, P. J. 1997. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature, 390: 162–165. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I. and Gough, L. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity?. Ecology, 82: 2381–2396. [CSA]
Mittelbach, G. G., Scheiner, S. M. and Steiner, C. F. 2003. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Reply. Ecology, 84: 3390–3395. [CSA]
Morin, P. J. and McGrady-Steed, J. 2004. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in aquatic microbial systems: a new analysis of temporal variation and species richness-predictability relations. Oïkos, 104: 458–466. [CSA]
Naeem, J. and Wright, J. P. 2003. Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecol. Lett., 6: 567–579. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Naeem, S. 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology, 83: 1537–1552. [CSA]
Naeem, S., Hahn, D. R. and Schuurman, G. 2000. Producer-decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature, 403: 762–764. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Naeem, S., Loreau, M. and Inchausti, P. 2002. “Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the emergence of a synthetic ecological framework”. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, Edited by: Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Inchausti, P. 3–11. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..
Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H. and Woodfin, R. M. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature, 368: 734–737. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Norberg, J. 2000. Resource-niche complementarity and autotrophic compensation determines ecosystem-level responses to increased cladoceran species richness. Oecologia, 122: 264–272. [CSA]
Norberg, J., Swaney, D. P., Dushoff, J., Lin, J., Casagrandi, R. and Levin, S. A. 2001. Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: a theoretical framework. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 11376–11381. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Petchey, O. L. 2000. Prey diversity, prey composition, and predator population dynamics in experimental microcosms. J. Anim. Ecol., 69: 874–882. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Schippers, P., Verschoor, A. M., Vos, M. and Mooij, W. M. 2001. Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”?. Ecol Let., 4: 404–407. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., Erasmus, B. F. N., Ferreira de Siqueira, M., Grainger, A., Hannah, L., Hughes, L., Huntley, B., van Jaarsveld, A., Midgley, G. F., Miles, L., Ortega-Huerta, M. A., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, O. L. and Williams, S. E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427: 145–148. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D. and Swackhamer, D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292: 281–284. [CROSSREF][CSA]
van, d er, Heijden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf-Engel, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A. and Sanders, I. R. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature, 396: 69–72. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Steiner, C. F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S. I., Juday, G. P. and Parmenter, R. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 30: 257–300. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Wardle, D. A. 1999. Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity- ecosystem function relationships. Oikos, 89: 11–23. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Whittaker, R. J. and Heegaard, E. 2003. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Comment. Ecology, 84: 3384–3390. [CSA]
Witman, J. D., Etter, R. J. and Smith, F. 2004. The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 15664–15669. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Wommack, K. E. and Colwell, R. R. 2000. Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 64: 69–114. [CROSSREF][CSA]
Wommack, K. E., Ravel, J., Hill, R. T., Chun, J. and Colwell, R. R. 1999. Population dynamics of Chesapeake Bay Virioplankton: total-community analysis by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 231–240. [CSA]
Yachi, S. and Loreau, M. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 1463–1468. [CSA]
Zhong, Y., Chen, F., Wilhelm, S. W., Poorvin, L. and Hodson, R. E. 2002. Phylogenetic diversity of marine cyanophage isolates and natural virus communities as revealed by sequences of viral capsid assembly protein gene g20. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68: 1576–1584. [CSA]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
