Evaluation of nitrogen balance on pig/crop farm systems in Jiulong River watershed, China

Authors

  • Yue Zeng State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China zengyue@yanan.xmu.edu.cn (Yue Zeng)
  • Hua-Sheng Hong State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Wen-Zhi Cao State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Neng-Wang Chen State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Wei-Ping Wang State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Luo-Ping Zhang State Key Laboratory of Marine Environment Science, Environmental Science Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Keywords:

environmental risk, nutrient surplus, loss

Abstract

Field surplus nitrogen and farm disposal nitrogen (N) are major sources of environmental pollution in farm systems. The purpose of this study was to use nitrogen balances at the field and farm level approaches to estimate the effects of pig production in the Jiulong River watershed, Fujian province, China, on nitrogen losses to the environment on 67 pig farms. The field surplus nitrogen ranged from 6.19 to 18.19 t nitrogen ha−1, which was caused by high pig density and excessive application of manure. Manure application rates of more than 450 to 510 kg nitrogen ha −1 would increase the potential nitrate concentration to more than 10 to 20 mg l −1. Therefore, 44 to 48 heads of pig ha −1 was suggested to as the environmental capacity for sustaining optimal nitrogen cycling in pig farms in the Jiulong River watershed.

The majority of farms have potential environmental risks because of high farm nitrogen imbalances. With more than a 2:1 ratio of N inputs to outputs, N inputs were 50 percent higher than outputs. Feed was the main input source, while pig production and manure exported were the major managed outputs. Based on the farm nitrogen balance calculation, the management options that would contribute to a more favorable nitrogen balance were also identified.

References

Aarts, H. F. M., Habekotte, B. and Van Keulen, H. 2000. Nitrogen (N) management in the ‘De Marke’ dairy farming system. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 56: 231–240. [CSA]

Barry, D. A. J., Goorahoo, D. and Goss, M. J. 1993. Estimation of nitrate concentrations in groundwater using a whole farm nitrogen budget. J. Environm. Qual., 22: 767–775. [CSA]

David, M. B., Gentry, L. E., Kovacic, D. A. and Smith, K. M. 1997. Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed. J. Environm. Qual., 26: 038–1048. [CSA]

Halberg, N. 1999. Indicators of resource use and environmental impact for use in a decision aid for Danish livestock farmers. Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environm., 76: 17–30. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Hayashi, Y. and Hatano, R. 1999. Annual nitrogen leaching in subsurface-drained water from a clayed aquic soil growing onions in Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 45: 451–459. [CSA]

Klausner, S. 1995. “Nutrient management planning”. In Animal Waste and the Land-Water Interface, Edited by: Steele, K. pp. 383–392. New York: Lewis Publishers.

Koelsch, R. and Lesoing, G. 1999. Nutrient balance on Nebraska livestock confinement systems. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 63–71. [PUBMED][INFOTRIEVE][CSA]

Kyriazakis, I. and Emmans, G. C. 1991. Diet selection in pigs: dietary choices made by growing pigs following a period of underfeeding with protein. Anim. Prod., 52: 337–346. [CSA]

Liao, X. 1998. Technology of Wastewater Treatment of Intensive Pig Confinement, China: Chinese Agricultural Pulisher.

McKown, C. D., Walker, J. W., Stuth, J. W. and Heitschmidt, R. K. 1991. Nutrient intake of cattle on rotational and continuous grazing treatments. J. Range Manage., 44: 596–601. [CSA]

Power, J. F. and Schepers, J. S. 1989. Nitrate contamination of groundwater in North America. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environm., 26: 165–187. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Ribaudo, M. O., Gollehon, N. R. and Agapoff, J. 2003. Land application of manure by animal feeding operations: is more land needed?. J. Soil Wat. Conserv., 58(1): 30–38. [CSA]

Ryden, J. C. 1983. Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate. J. Soil Sci., 34: 35–365. [CSA]

Ryusuke, H., Takuro, S., Zheng, T., Masahiko, O. and Li, Z. 2002. Nitrogen budgets and environmental capacity in farm systems in a large-scale karst region, southern China. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 63: 139–149. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Smolen, M. D., Storm, D. E., Peel, D. and Kenkel, P. 1994. “Mass balance analysis of nutrient flow through feed and waste in the livestock industry in the southern plains”. In Great Plains Animal Waste Conference on Confined Animal Production and Water Quality, pp. 168–174. Englewood, CO: National Cattlemen's Association.

Van Beek, C. L., Brouwer, L. and Oenema, O. 2003. The use of farmgate balances and soil surface balances as estimator for nitrogen leaching to surface water. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 67: 233–244. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Williams, P. 1995. Animal production and European pollution problems. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn., 53: 135–144. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Yuan, X., Tong, Y., Yang, X., Li, X. and Zhang, F. 2000. Effects of organic manure on soil nitrate nitrogen accumulation. Soil Environm. Sci., 9(3): 197–200. [CSA]

Zebarth, B. J., Liebscher, B. H. and Chipperfield, K. 1998. Agricultural land use practices and nitrate contamination in the Abbotsford Aquifer, British Columbia, Canada. Agriculture. Ecosyst. Environm., 69: 99–112. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Zhang, K. and Gao, H. 2004. Treatment and Disposal of Wastewater from Animal Production, China: Chemical Industry Press.

Zhu, Z. L. 2003. Fertilizer management strategies for the harmonization of agriculture development with environment protection. J. Chinese Inst. Sci., 2: 89–93. [CSA]

Published

2006-01-01