Cumulative effects assessment of bay ecosystem: Xiamen's Western Sea, a case study

Authors

  • Xiai Yang Xiamen Environmental Monitoring Centre, 361005, Xiamen, China
  • Xiongzhi Xue Key Laboratory for Marine Environmental Science of Ministry of Education, Environmental Science Research Centre, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • Shawn S. Shen Department of International Development Studies, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, B3H 3C, Canada

Keywords:

Cumulative effects assessment, bay ecosystem, Xiamen's Western Seas

Abstract

Considering the deficiency of conventional environment a impacts assessment to protect bay ecosystems from unfavourable impacts of multiple human activities over the years, this paper discusses an effective approach framework to examine addictive or interactive impacts arising from the collective multiple activities of the past. There are three stages of the cumulative effects assessment process: 1) systematically selecting indicators of the ecosystem in question, 2) choosing the quantified or semi-quantified methods to assess indicators of changes, and 3) assessing the past contributions of the activities to the changes.

In a case study of Xiamen's Western Sea in China, the indicators were constructed according to their sensitivities to environmental stress and classified into three categories: physical, chemical and biological indicators. The Geography Information System and Pearson correlation analysis were applied to assess changes of the physical and chemical indicators. The case study showed that most of the indicators of Xiamen's Western Sea ecosystem have been changed greatly in the past five decades, especially in shoreline, sea area, water quality, community construction of phytoplankton and benthos, and mangrove forests. Coastal and dike construction and terrestrial pollutant input are the main causes of the changes.

References

Bain, M. B., Irving, J. S., Olsen, E. A. and Witmer, G. W. 1986. Cumulative impact assessment: Evaluating the environmental effects of multiple human developments, Argonne, Illinois: Argonne National Laboratory. ANL/EES-TM-309

Gosselink, J. and Lee, L. 1989. Cumulative impact assessment in bottomland hardwood forests. Wetland, 9: 93–174. [CSA]

Hegmann, G., Cocklin, C., Creasey, R., Dupuis, S., Kennedy, A. and Kingsley, L. 1999. Cumulative effects assessment practitioner's guide, Prepared by AXYS Environmental Consulting and CEA Working Group Hull, QC, , Canada: The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

Lane, P. A. 1990. Symmetry, change, perturbation and observing mode in natural communities. Ecology, 67: 223–239. [CSA]

Dubé, M. G. 2003. Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: a regional framework for aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23: 723–745. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Smit, B. and Spaling, H. 1995. Methods for cumulative effects assessment. Environm. Impact Assess. Rev., 15: 81–106. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Spaling, H. 1994. Cumulative effects assessment: Concepts and principles. Impact Assess, 12: 231–52. [CSA]

Stakhiv, E. Z. 1988. An evaluation paradigm for cumulative impact analysis. Environm. Manage., 12: 725–748. [CSA][CROSSREF]

Published

2006-01-01