The design of public participation in Environmental Impact Assessments
Keywords:
Legal requirements, regulation, designAbstract
Public participation has become an important part in the Environmental Impact Assessment process. However, a few factors can affect, even change, its positive effect, including times when the public is to be involved, and the distribution of the necessary forms to the public involved. Therefore it is very important to pay attention to those factors and to design an integrated plan for public participation in the assessment process. In this article, the legal requirements for public participation are firstly set out, then current problems as well as the gaps between the practices and regulations of participation are analyzed. The design of a plan to improve the effectiveness of the assessment process, including designing principles, defining the roles of the different actors, setting standards for selecting the form(s) to involve participation of the public, and defining the times when the public is to be involved, is discussed.
References
John, G., Therivel, R. and Andrew, C. 1999. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (), 2nd Ed., London: Spon Press.
Li, Y. F. 2001. Public participation in Environmental Impact Statement of USA. Environm. Protect, 10: 33–34. [CSA]
Li, Y. W. and Sun, H. G. 2004. The current status of and countermeasures to the public participation in EIA in China. Environm. Sci. Trends, 1: 3–5. [CSA]
Lin, F. C. and Lu, Y. S. 1999. Evaluation of the Environmental Impact Assessment System in China. Res. Environm. Sci., 12(2): 8–11. [CSA]
Luca, D. F. and Jane, W. J. 2000. The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy. Environm. Impact Assess. Rev., 20: 457–479. [CSA][CROSSREF]
Luo, H., Chai, F. H. and Zhou, L. 2000. The problems and countermeasures in Environmental Impact Assessment in China. Environm. Exploration, 15(4): 43–44. [CSA]
Richardson, T., Dusik, J. and Jindrova, P. 1998. Parallel public participation: An answer to inertia in decision-making. Environm. Impact Assess. Rev., 18: 210–216. [CSA]
Sadar, M. H. 1996. Environmental Impact Assessment (), 2nd ed, Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
SCCNC (Standing Committee of Chinese National Congress). 2002. The Explanation and Application Direction to the EIA Act of P.R.C., Beijing: Chinese Environmental Sciences Press.
SEPA (State Environmental Protection Administration of China). 2003. HJ/T130-2003 Beijing: Chinese Environmental Sciences Press.
Wang, Y., Richard, K. M. and Mat, C. 2003. Environmental impact assessment of projects in the People's Republic of China: new law, old problems. Environm. Impact Assess. Rev., 23: 543–579. [CSA][CROSSREF]
Wang, Z. G., Chen, B. L. and Chen, X. G. 2000. Mechanism and efficiency of public participation in Environment Impact Assessments. Environm. Herald, 3: 1–3. [CSA]
Wood, C. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment (2nd ed), England: Pearson Education Ltd.
Zhang, Y., Yang, K., Wang, Y. and Ye, W. 2002. Studies on evaluating environmental impact assessment effectiveness. China Environm. Sci., 22(4): 324–328. [CSA]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
