Warmer and drier climates that make Lake Huron into a terminal lake
Keywords:
climate change, Laurentian Great Lakes, hydrology, closed lakes, modelingAbstract
Paleo-hydrologists have adjusted for glacial isostatic uplift and compared the original elevations of paleo-water level indicators and basin outlets for Lake Huron, revealing that Huron lake levels fell tens of meters below its lowest possible outlet (becoming a terminal lake) about 7,900 14C years BP. This corresponds to when the upper Great Lakes stopped receiving glacial melt inflow and became dependent for water supply on precipitation alone, as at present. Since these researchers accounted for differential isostatic effects, they surmised that the upper Great Lakes were impacted by severe dry climate. To understand possible climate changes that led to the closure, the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory applied their Advanced Hydrologic Prediction System to explore deviations from present climates that could force the upper Great Lakes to become terminal. GLERL modeled the steady-state water balance of the present upper Great Lakes with pre-development natural water flow conditions by employing lake outflow-depth rating curves (using estimated sill elevations) reasonable for a natural system and by using dynamic lake areas controlled by observed hypsometric relations for each lake. By using systematic shifts in precipitation and temperature relative to the present base climate, GLERL showed the temperature rises and precipitation drops required for a terminal lake; they may be less extreme if additional effects of past differences in wind speed and insolation are also considered.
References
Croley, T. E. II. 2002. “Large basin runoff model”. In Mathematical Models in Watershed Hydrology, Edited by: Singh, V., Frevert, D. and Meyer, S. 717–770. Littleton, Colorado: Water Resources Publications.
Croley, T. E. II. 2005. “Using Climate Predictions in Great Lakes Hydrologic Forecasts”. In Climatic Variability, Climate Change, and Water Resources Management, Edited by: Garbrecht, J. and Piechota, T. 166–187. Arlington, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Croley, T. E. II and Lewis, C. F. M. 2006. Warmer and drier climates that make terminal Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 32(4): 852–869.
Lewis, C. F. M., Blasco, S. M. and Gareau, P. L. 2007a. Glacio–isostatic adjustment of the Laurentian Great Lakes basin: using the empirical record of strandline deformation for reconstruction of early Holocene paleolakes and discovery of a hydrologically closed phase. Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 59(2–3): 187–210.
Lewis, C. F. M., Heil, C. W. Jr., Hubeny, J. B., King, J. W., Moore, T. C. Jr and Rea, D. K. 2007b. The Stanley unconformity in Lake Huron basin, evidence for a climate–driven closed lowstand about 7900 14C BP, with similar implications for the Chippewa lowstand in Lake Michigan basin. Journal of Paleolimnology, 37(3): 435–452.
Lofgren, B. M., Quinn, F. H., Clites, A. H., Assel, R. A., Eberhardt, A. J. and Luukkonen, C. L. 2002. Evaluation of potential impacts on Great Lakes water resources based on climate scenarios of two GCMs. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 28(4): 537–554.
Southam, C. 1989. Procedure for developing the Great Lakes level and flow regime for pre-project conditions Functional Group 1, Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Climate, IJC Great Lakes Water Levels Reference Study, Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.