Biological evaluation of Michigan's non-wadeable rivers using macroinvertebrates

Authors

  • Kelly J. Wessell Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
  • Richard W. Merritt Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
  • Jennifer G.O. Wilhelm King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
  • J. David Allan School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115 USA
  • Kenneth W. Cummins California Cooperative Fisheries Unit, Department of Fisheries, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521 USA
  • Donald G. Uzarski Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Brooks 156, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859

Keywords:

bioassessment, water quality, stream health

Abstract

Non-wadeable rivers are relatively understudied compared to smaller, wadeable streams. Currently, protocols exist in most states, including Michigan, to evaluate the ecological condition of wadeable streams, but few protocols exist for larger, non-wadeable rivers. The goal of this research was to develop a multimetric index of biological integrity for Michigan's non-wadeable rivers, and we sampled 28 unique river reaches in Michigan that encompassed a wide range of human impacts and ecological conditions. In each reach, we collected physical, chemical, and macroinvertebrate samples. Using several techniques to eliminate redundancy among metrics and identify those biological attributes that correlated with anthropogenic influences, we developed a useful protocol that will allow the rapid bioassessment of such rivers in Michigan. When used together with the Non-wadeable Habitat Index, the Non-wadeable Index of Biotic Integrity (NW-IBI) will allow objective evaluation of non-wadeable rivers in Michigan.

References

Barbour, M. T., Plafkin, J. L., Bradley, B. P., Graves, C. G. and Wisseman, R. W. 1992. Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: Metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. Toronto, Ont. (Canada), Symposium on Community Metrics to Detect Ecosystem Effects

Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. and Stribling, J. B. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. , 2nd edition, Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. EPA 841-B-99-002

Cairns, J. J. 1990. The genesis of biomonitoring in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Profess., 12: 169–176.

Cottingham, K. L. and Carpenter, S. R. 1998. Population, Community, and Ecosystem Variates as Ecological Indicators: Phytoplankton Responses to Whole-Lake Enrichment. Ecological Applications, 8: 508–530.

Cummins, K. W. 1988. “The study of stream ecosystems: A functional view”. In Concepts of Ecosystem Ecology: A Comparative View, Edited by: Pomeroy, L. R. and Alberts, J. J. 247–261. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cummins, K. W. 1993. Bioassessment and analysis of functional organization of running water ecosystems, Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.

Cummins, K. W., Wilzbach, M. A., Gates, D. M., Perry, J. B. and Taliaferro, W. B. 1989. Shredders and riparian vegetation. Bioscience, 39: 24–30.

Fausch, K. D., Karr, J. R. and Yant, P. R. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 113: 39–55.

Fore, L. S. and Grafe, C. S. 2002. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho. Freshwater Biology, 47: 2015–2037.

Gore, J. A. and Shields, F. D. 1995. Can large rivers be restored?. Bioscience, 45: 142–152.

Hawkins, C. P., Norris, R. H., Hogue, J. N. and Feminella, J. W. 2000. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams. Ecological Applications, 10(5): 1456–1477.

Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7: 65–68.

Jacob, U. and Walther, H. 1981. Aquatic insect larvae as indicators of limiting minimal contents of dissolved oxygen. Aquatic Insects, 3: 219–224.

Johnson, B. L., Richardson, W. B. and Naimo, T. J. 1995. Past, present, and future concepts in large river ecology: How rivers function and how human activities influence river processes. Bioscience, 45: 134–141.

Karr, J. R. 1987. Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: A conceptual framework. Environmental Management, 11: 249–256.

Karr, J. R. 1997. The future is now: Biological monitoring to ensure healthy waters. Northwest Science, 71: 254–257.

Karr, J. R. and Chu, E. W. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters., Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Kerans, B. L. and Karr, J. R. 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecological Applications, 4: 768–785.

Klemm, D. J., Lazorchak, J. M. and Peck, D. V. 1999. “Benthic Macroinvertebrates”. In Field operations and methods for measuring the ecological condition of non-wadeable rivers and streams, Edited by: Lazorchak, J. M., Hill, B. H., Averill, D. K., Peck, D. V. and Klemm, D. J. 133–150. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Lazorchak, J. M., Hill, B. H., Averill, D. K., Peck, D. V. and Klemm, D. J. 2000. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program -Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Non-wadeable Rivers and Streams, Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Marshall, K. E. 1993. The Literature of Biomonitoring, New York: Chapman and Hall.

Mebane, C. A., Maret, T. R. and Hughes, R. M. 2003. An index of biological integrity (IBI) for Pacific Northwest rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132(2): 239–261.

Merritt, R. W., Wallace, J. R., Higgins, M. J., Alexander, M. K., Berg, M. B., Morgan, W. T., Cummins, K. W. and Vandeneeden, B. 1996. Procedures for the functional analysis of invertebrate communities in the Kissimmee River-floodplain ecosystem. Florida Scientist, 59(4): 216–274.

Merritt, R. W., Cummins, K. W., Berg, M. B., Novak, J. A., Higgins, M. J., Wessell, K. J. and Lessard, J. L. 2002. Development and application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approach in the bioassessment of remnant river oxbows in southwest Florida. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21: 290–310.

Merritt, R. W., Allan, J. D., Cummins, K. W., Wessell, K. J. and Wilhelm, J. O. 2005. Qualitative biological and habitat protocols for Michigan's non-wadeable rivers, Lansing, Michigan: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.

Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1991. Qualitative Biological and Habitat Survey Protocols for Wadable Streams and Rivers: Great Lakes and Environmental Assessment Section (GLEAS) Procedure 51, Lansing, MI: Michgian Department of Natural Resources.

Noss, R. F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4: 355–364.

Ohio, E PA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Vol. III. Standardized field sampling and laboratory methods for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities, Columbus, OH: Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment.

Paton, A. 1979. “The harnessing of large rivers”. In Tidal power and estuary management, 1–13. Bristol: Scientechnica Colston Papers.

Pinel-Alloul, B., Methot, G., Lapierre, L. and Willsie, A. 1996. Macroinvertebrate community as a biological indicator of ecological and toxicological factors in Lake Saint-Francois (Quebec). Environmental Pollution, 91: 65–87.

Rosenberg, D. M. and Resh, V. H. 1993. “Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates”. In Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Edited by: Rosenberg, D. M. and Resh, V. H. 1–9. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Royer, T. V., Robinson, C. T. and Minshall, G. W. 2001. Development of macroinvertebrate-based index for bioassessment of Idaho Rivers. Environmental Management., 27: 627–636.

Sedell, J. R., Richey, J. E. and Swanson, F. J. The river continuum concept: A basis for the expected ecosystem behavior of very large rivers?. Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Edited by: Dodge, D. P. Vol. 106, pp.49–55.

Smith, R. A., Alexander, R. B. and Wolman, M. G. 1987. Water quality trends in the nation's rivers. Science, 235: 1607–1615.

Sparks, R. E. 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience, 45: 168–182.

Sparks, R E., Bayley, P. B., Kohler, S. L. and Osborne, L. L. 1990. Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers. Environmental Management, 14: 699–709.

Stalnaker, C. B., Milhous, R. T. and Bovee, K. D. 1989. Hydrology and hydraulics applied to fishery management in large rivers. Canadian special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106: 13–30.

Stevenson, R. J. 1998. Diatom indicators of stream and wetland stressors in a risk management framework. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 51: 1–2.

U. S. EPA. 2000. Stressor Identification Guidance Document Washington, D.C. EPA-822-B-00-025

Uzarski, D. G., Burton, T. M., Cooper, M. J., Ingram, J. and Timmermans, S. 2005. Fish Habitat Use Within and Across Wetland Classes in Coastal Wetlands of the Five Great Lakes: Development of a Fish Based Index of Biotic Integrity. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 31(1): 171–187.

Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. and Cushing, C. E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37: 130–137.

Wessell, K. J. 2004. Biological evaluation of non-wadeable rivers in Michigan, Ph.D. thesis East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.

Wilhelm, J. G. O. 2002. A Habitat Rating System for Non-wadeable Rivers of Michigan, Master's Thesis Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Wilhelm, J. G. O., Allan, J. D., Wessell, K. J., Merritt, R. W., Cummins, K. W. and Cummins, K. W. 2005. Habitat evaluation of non-wadeable rivers. Environmental Management, 36(4): 592–609.

Young, R. G. and Huryn, A. D. 1999. Effects of land use on stream metabolism and organic matter turnover. Ecological Applications, 9: 1359–1376.

Downloads

Published

2008-08-25

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2008)

Section

Research article

License

Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.