Phytoplankton community assessment in eight Lake Ontario tributaries made using fluorimetric methods
Keywords:
algae, cyanobacteria, FRRF, FluoroProbe, CDOM, Great Lakes, water qualityAbstract
Coastal inputs of nutrients and contaminants impact phytoplankton community composition and health in localized and large areas of coastal Lake Ontario. Advanced fluorimetric instrumentation (Fast Repetition Rate Fluorimeter [FRRF], FluoroProbe) was used during June 2006 to assess the in situ phytoplankton community of eight tributaries of Lake Ontario (Chaumont Bay, Sacketts Harbor/Black River, Oswego River, Port Bay, Sodus Bay, Irondequoit Bay, Genesee River, and Eighteen Mile Creek) representing a range of geomorphological features (rivers, protected embayments, open embayments). The instrumentation enabled high resolution (160 m) continuous monitoring of phytoplankton community composition (FluoroProbe) and photosynthetic efficiency (FRRF) along 1 m deep transect from nearshore (coastal Lake Ontario, > 7 m depth) to inshore (within the tributary, < 7 m depth). Limnological parameters such as water temperature, colored dissolved organic matter content (CDOM), total phosporus, nitrate, chloride, light extinction coefficient, and extracted size fractionated (0.2–2 μ m, 2–20 μ m, > 20 μ m) chlorophyll a concentrations were also determined. Results from this study illustrate the strong environmental gradients that exist along tributary transition zones into Lake Ontario. Offshore water quality was homogeneous and reflected nutrients levels (e.g. total phosphorus) that were below the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement target value (10 μ g per litre), whereas most tributary inputs had elevated nutrient and chloride levels. Phytoplankton community composition differed between inshore and offshore sites and the transition coincided with changing water quality (followed using water temperature and CDOM concentrations) at the interface of the surface water masses. The greatest observed photosynthetic efficiencies occurred in the inshore environment; this is attributed to the greater nutrient availability rather than lower light levels. Fluorimetric applications provide useful techniques for monitoring water quality. Given the observed diversity of phytoplankton community and health among these tributary inputs, it follows that monitoring capabilities using the instrumentation applied here should be enhanced to observe these systems.
References
Beutler, M., Wilstshire, K. H., Meyer, B., Moldaenke, C., Lüring, C., Meyerhöfer, M., Hansen, U.-P. and Dau, H. 2002. A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. Photosyn. Res., 72: 39–53.
Beutler, M., Wiltshire, K. H., Arp, M., Kruse, J., Reineke, C., Moldaenke, C. and Hansen, U.-P. 2003. A reduced model of the fluorescence from the cyanobacterial photosynthetic apparatus designed for the in situ detection of cyanobacteria. Bioch. Bioph. Acta, 1604: 33–46.
Gregor, J. and Maršálek, B. 2004. Freshwater phytoplankton quantification by chlorophyll a: a comparative study of in vitro, in vivo and in situ methods. Wat. Res., 38: 517–52.
Hecky, R. E., Smith, R. E. H., Barton, D. R., Guildford, S. J., Taylor, W. D., Charlton, M. N. and Howell, T. 2004. The nearshore phosphorus shunt: a consequence of ecosystem engineering by dreissenids in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61: 1285–129.
Landre, B., Lewandowski, S., Makarewicz, J., Terninko, J. and Thorndike, E. 2006. Lake Ontario Coastal Initiative: Action Agenda, 97Rochester, NY: Center for Environmental Information. The Lake Ontario Coastal Initiative.
Makarewicz, J. C. 1987. Phytoplankton composition, abundance, and distribution: nearshore Lake Ontario and Oswego River and harbor. J. Great Lakes Res., 13: 56–64.
McKnight, D. M., Hood, E. and Klapper, L. 2003. “Trace organic moieties of dissolved organic material in natural waters”. In Aquatic Ecosystems – Interactivity of Dissolved Organic Matter, Edited by: Findlay, S. E. G. and Sinsabaugh, R. L. 671–96. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Mills, E. L., Casselman, J. M., Dermott, R., Fitzsimons, J. D., Gal, G., Holeck, K. T., Hoyle, J. A., Johannsson, O. E., Lantry, B. F., Makarewicz, J. C., Millard, E. S., Munawar, I. F., Munawar, M., O'Gorman, R., Owens, R. W., Rudstam, L. G., Schaner, T. and Stewart, T. J. 2003. Lake Ontario: food web dynamics in a changing ecosystem (1970-2000). Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 60: 471–490.
Munawar, M. and Munawar, I. F. 2003. “Changes in phytoplankton community structure and primary production of Lake Ontario”. In State of Lake Ontario: Past, Present, and Future, Edited by: Munawar, M. 187–219. Burlington, ON: Ecovision World Monograph Series, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society.
Ostrom, N. E., Carrick, H. J., Twiss, M. R. and Piwinski, L. 2005. Evaluation of primary production in Lake Erie by multiple proxies. Oecologia, 144: 115–124.
Pemberton, K. L., Smith, R. E. H., Silsbe, G. M., Howell, T. and Watson, S. B. 2007. Controls on phytoplankton physiology in Lake Ontario during the late summer: evidence from new fluorescence methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 64: 58–73.
Smyth, T. J., Pemberton, K. L., Aiken, J. and Geider, R. J. 2004. A methodology to determine primary production and phytoplankton photosynthetic parameters from Fast Repetition Rate Fluorimetry. J. Plankt. Res., 26: 1337–1350.
Welschemeyer, N. A. 1994. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and phaeopigments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 39: 1985–1992.
Wetzel, R. G. and Likens, G. E. 2000. Limnological Analyses, , Third Edition, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
