Distribution of biologically functional habitats within a lowland river, United Kingdom
Keywords:
aquatic macrophytes, substrate, aquatic habitat, physical biotopesAbstract
The assessment and appraisal of river habitat quality for purposes of legislative compliance requires a sound understanding of the interactions between the hydrogeomorphological and ecological components of the instream environment. Reconciliation of complementary habitat concepts developed from geomorphology (‘physical biotopes’) and from ecology (biologically ‘functional’ habitats) offers improved integrity of both concepts, but may be limited by factors such as the distributional characteristics of functional habitats. Field surveys conducted on a lowland river in Shropshire, UK, reveal differences in both the spatial organisation and seasonal variations in abundance among functional habitat categories. Furthermore, the level of human modification to the channel and banks appears to influence the spatial organisation of certain functional habitats within the river channel. These factors have implications for rapid field survey methods and for the potential for linking functional habitats with the complementary geomorphological concept of physical biotopes.
References
Butcher, R. W. 1933. Studies on the ecology of rivers: I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. The Journal of Ecology, 21(1): 58–91.
Emery, J. C., Gurnell, A. M., Clifford, N. J., Petts, G. E., Morrissey, I. P. and Soar, P. J. 2003. Classifying the hydraulic performance of riffle-pool bedforms for habitat assessment and river rehabilitation design. River Research and Applications, 19: 533–549.
Environment Agency. 2003. River Habitat Survey in Britain and Ireland: Field Survey Guidance Manual, 2003 Version, UK: Environment Agency.
Fox, A. M. 1996. “Macrophytes”. In River Biota: Diversity and Dynamics, Edited by: Petts, G. E. and Calow, P. 27–44. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd..
Giller, P. S. and Malmqvist, B. 1998. The Biology of Streams and Rivers, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gregg, W. W. and Rose, F. L. 1982. The effects of aquatic macrophytes on the stream micro-environment. Aquatic Botany, 14: 309–324.
Harper, D. M., Smith, C. D., Barham, P. J. and Howell, R. 1995. “The ecological basis for the management of the natural river environment”. In The Ecological Basis for River Management, Edited by: Harper, D. M. and Ferguson, A. J. D. 219–238. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Harper, D. M., Smith, C. D., Kemp, J. L. and Crosa, G. A. 1998. “The use of ‘functional habitats’ in the conservation, management and rehabilitation of rivers”. In Advances in River Bottom Ecology, Edited by: Bretschko, G. and Helesic, J. 315–326. Leiden, , the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.
Harper, D. M., Kemp, J. L., Vogel, B. and Newson, C. L. 2000. Towards an assessment of ‘ecological integrity’ in running waters of the United Kingdom. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 133–142.
Harvey, G., Clifford, N. J. and Gurnell, A. M. 2008. Towards an ecologically meaningful classification of the flow biotope for river inventory, rehabilitation, design and appraisal purposes. Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 638–650.
Haslam, S. M. 1978. River Plants: The macrophytic vegetation of watercourses, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jowett, I. G. 1993. A method for objectively identifying pool, run and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27: 241–248.
Moss, B. 2000. Biodiversity in fresh waters—an issue of species preservation or system functioning?. Environmental Conservation, 27(1): 1–4.
Newson, M. D. and Newson, C. L. 2000. Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat; mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography, 24(2): 195–217.
Padmore, C. L. 1998. The role of physical biotopes in determining the conservation status and flow requirements of British rivers. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 1: 25–35.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy
Wright, J. F., Blackburn, J. F., Westlake, D. F., Furse, M. T. and Armitage, P. D. 1992. “Anticipating the consequences of river management for the conservation of macroinvertebrates”. In River Conservation and Management, Edited by: Boon, P. J., Calow, P. and Petts, G. E. 137–149. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
