Estimation of zooplankton abundance, distribution patterns and patchiness in a large humic lake using an Optical Plankton Counter

Authors

  • Minna Rahkola-Sorsa University of Joensuu, Faculty of Bioscience, Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
  • Valentin Avinsky Institute of Limnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Sevastyanov Street 9, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Petra Can University of Joensuu, Department of Statistics, Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
  • Kai Rasmus University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland, and Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), P.O. Box 140, FI 00251 Helsinki, Finland
  • Greta Waissi University of Joensuu, Faculty of Bioscience, Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
  • Markku Viljanen University of Joensuu, Faculty of Bioscience, Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland

Keywords:

heterogeneity, Lake Pyhäselkä, variability, spatial and temporal scale

Abstract

Zooplankton usually behaves in complex and dynamic ways on various temporal and spatial scales and its spatial distribution is usually highly aggregated, as it possesses a large-scale spatial variability similar to that observed in the physical environment in general. We assess here the suitability of the Optical Plankton Counter for estimating zooplankton abundance, as well as the day-to-day temporal and spatial patterns in its distribution during the open water season. The influence of certain environmental variables on zooplankton abundances is also examined.

Abundances of mesozooplankton-sized particles were measured with the Optical Plankton Counter monthly at five stations in a large mesohumic lake from May to September 2005 and agreed rather well with zooplankton abundances counted using a microscope. The poorest agreement was in autumn, when the Counter overestimated the zooplankton abundance, and for some samples in July, when it underestimated the abundance. Fluorescence and chlorophyll a had a significant effect on the Counter readings. Both the intercept and the slope of chlorophyll a varied randomly between depths, because the chlorophyll a decreased much more markedly in deeper waters than did the Counter particle counts. This emphasized the stratified nature of sampling.

In addition to seasonal variations, there were also marked short-interval variations (day-to-day) in zooplankton abundances in all the sampling periods. These patterns are highly dynamic and can on some occasions change rapidly in response to fluctuations in the weather. There were no clear differences in zooplankton abundance between the sampling stations. The horizontal heterogeneity was less pronounced than the seasonal and short-interval heterogeneity, possibly because there were no trophic gradients in the basin.

While the Optical Plankton Counter provided a rapid assessment of temporal and spatial patterns of zooplankton abundances, it does have limitations. At times it either overestimated abundances due to a large contribution from non-zooplankton particles, or underestimated abundances due to coincidence.

References

Beaulieu, S. E., Mullin, M. M., Van Tang, T., Pyne, S. M., King, A. L. and Twining, B. S. 1999. Using an optical plankton counter to determine the size disributions of preserved zooplankton samples. J. Plankton Res., 21: 1939–1956.

Evans, M. S. and Sell, D. W. 1983. Zooplankton sampling strategies for environmental studies. Hydrobiologia, 99: 215–223.

Finlay, K., Beisner, B. E. and Barnett, A. 2007. The use of the Laser Optical Plankton Counter to measure zooplankton size, abundance, and biomass in small freshwater lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 5: 41–49.

George, D. G. 1974. Dispersion patterns in the zooplankton populations of a eutrophic reservoir. J. Anim. Ecol., 43: 537–551.

George, D. G. 2000. The impact of regional-scale changes in the weather on the long-term dynamics of Eudiaptomus and Daphnia in Esthwaite Water, Cumbria. Freshwater Biology, 45: 111–121.

George, D. G. and Edwards, R. W. 1976. The effect of wind on the distribution of chlorophyll a and crustacean plankton in a shallow eutrophic reservoir. Journal of Applied Ecology, 13: 667–691.

George, D. G. and Winfield, I. J. 2000. Factors influencing the spatial distributions of zooplankton and fish in Loch Ness, UK. Freshwater Biology, 43: 557–570.

Goldstein, H. 1986. Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrica, 73: 43–56.

González-Quirós, R. and Checkley, D. M. Jr. 2006. Occurrence of fragile particles inferred from optical plankton counters used in situ and to analyse net samples collected simultaneously. J. Geophys. Res., 111: C05S06 doi:10.1029/2005JC003084

Grant, S., Ward, P., Murphy, E., Bone, D. and Abbott, S. 2000. Field comparison of an LHPR net sampling system and an Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) in the Southern Ocean. J. Plankton Res., 22: 619–638.

Herman, A. W. 1988. Simultaneous measurement of zooplankton and light attenuance with a new optical plankton counter. Continental Shelf Research, 8: 205–221.

Herman, A. W. 1992. Design and calibration of a new optical plankton counter capable of sizing small zooplankton. Deep-Sea Res., 39: 395–415.

Huntley, M., Zhou, E. M. and Nordhausen, W. 1995. Mesoscale distribution of zooplankton in California Current in late spring, observed by Optical Plankton Counter. J. Marine Res., 53: 647–674.

Huttula, T., Koponen, J., Lehtinen, K., Walhgren, A. and Niinioja, R. 1996. Water currents and spreading of river load in Lake Pyhäselkä, Saimaa, Finland. Hydrobiologia, 322: 177–124.

Karjalainen, J., Holopainen, A.-L. and Huttunen, P. 1996a. Spatial patterns and relationships between phytoplankton, zooplankton and water quality in the Saimaa lake system, Finland. Hydrobiologia, 322: 267–276.

Karjalainen, J., Rahkola, M., Viljanen, M., Andronikova, I. and Avinsky, V. 1996b. Comparison of methods used in zooplankton sampling and counting in the joint Russian-Finnish evaluation of the trophic state of Lake Ladoga. Hydrobiologia, 322: 249–253.

Karjalainen, J., Rahkola, M., Holopainen, A.-L., Huttula, T., Jurvelius, J., Viljanen, M., Avinsky, V., Letanskaya, G. and Telesh, I. 1999. Trophic gradients and associated changes in plankton community in two bays of Lake Ladoga. Boreal Environment Research, 4: 229–238.

Kessler, K. and Lampert, W. 2003. Counting and sizing preserved Daphnia with the optical plankton counter. Arch. Hydrobiol., 156: 485–493.

Liebig, J. R., Vanderploeg, H. A. and Ruberg, S. A. 2006. Factors affecting the performance of the optical plankton counter in lare lakes: Insights from Lake Michigan. J. Geophys. Res., 111: C05S02 doi:10.1029/2005JC003087

Malone, B. J. and McQueen, D. J. 1983. Horizontal patchiness in zooplankton populations in two Ontario kettle lakes. Hydrobiologia, 99: 101–124.

Masson, S. and Pinel-Alloul, B. 1998. Spatial distribution of zooplankton biomass size fractions in a bog lake: abiotic and (or) biotic regulation?. Can. J. Zool., 76: 805–823.

Mehner, T., Hölker, F. and Kasprzak, P. 2005. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of trophic variables in a deep lake as reflected by repeated singular samplings. Oikos, 108: 401–409.

Mitikka, S. and Ekholm, P. 2003. Lakes in the Finnish Eurowaternet: status and trends. The Science of the Total Environment, 310: 37–45.

Moore, S. K. and Suthers, I. M. 2006. Evaluation and correction of subresolved particles by the optical plankton counter in three Australian estuaries with pristine to highly modified catchments. J. Geophys. Res., 111: C05S04 doi:10.1029/2005JC002920

Niemi, J., Heinonen, P., Mitikka, S., Vuoristo, H., Pietiläinen, O.-P., Puupponen, M. and Rönkä, E. 2001. The Finnish Eurowaternet with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies. Finnish environment, 445: 1–62.

Patoine, A., Pinel-Alloul, B., Méthod, G. and Leblanc, M.-J. 2006. Correspondence among methods of zooplankton biomass measurements in lake: effect of community composition on optical plankton counter and size-fractionated seston data. J. Plankton Res., 28: 695–705.

Pinel-Alloul, B. 1995. Spatial heterogeneity as a multiscale characteristic of zooplankton community. Hydrobiologia, 300/301: 17–42.

Pinel-Alloul, B., Guay, C., Angeli, N., Legendre, P., Dutilleul, P., Balvay, G., Gerdeaux, D. and Guillard, J. 1999. Large-scale spatial heterogeneity of macrozooplankton in Lake Geneva. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 56: 1437–1451.

Rahkola, M., Karjalainen, J. and Avinsky, V. 1998. Individual weight estimates of zooplankton based on length-weight regressions in Lake Ladoga and Saimaa lake system. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research, 74: 110–120.

Rinke, K., Hübner, I., Petzoldt, T., Rolinski, S., König-Rinke, M., Post, J., Lorke, A. and Benndorf, J. 2007. How internal waves influence the vertical distribution of zooplankton. Freshwater Biology, 52: 137–144.

Sprules, W. G., Jin, E. H., Herman, A. W. and Stockwell, J. D. 1998. Calibration of an optical plankton counter for use in fresh water. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43: 726–733.

Thackeray, S. J., George, G., Jones, R. and Winfield, I. J. 2004. Quantitative analysis of the importance of wind-induced circulation for spatial structuring of planktonic populations. Freshwater Biology, 49: 1091–1102.

Urabe, J. 1990. Stable horizontal variation in the zooplankton community structure of a reservoir maintained be predation and competition. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35: 1703–1717.

Viljanen, M. and Karjalainen, J. 1993. Horizontal distibution of zooplankton in two large lakes in eastern Finland. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol., 25: 548–551.

Viljanen, M., Rahkola-Sorsa, M., Holopainen, A.-L., Can, P., Mattila, M. and Waissi, G. 2009. Temporal and spatial variation in pelagic phytoplankton and zooplankton in the central basin of a large lake, Finland. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 30: 1000–1006.

Viljanen, M., Holopainen, A.-L., Rahkola-Sorsa, M., Avisky, V., Ruuska, M., Leppänen, S., Rasmus, K. and Voutilainen, A. 2009. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of pelagic plankton in Lake Pyhäselkä, Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 14: 93–913.

Wieland, K., Petersen, D. and Schnack, D. 1997. Estimates of zooplankton abundance and size distribution with the Optical Plankton Counter (OPC). Arch. Fish. Mar. Res., 45: 271–280.

Yurista, P., Kelly, J. R. and Miller, S. 2005. Evaluation of optically acquired zooplankton size-spectrum data as a potential tool for assessment of condition in the Great Lakes. Environmental Management, 35: 34–44.

Zhang, X., Roman, M., Sandford, A., Adolf, H., Lascara, C. and Burgett, R. 2000. Can an optical plankton counter produce reasonable estimates of zooplankton abundance and biovolume in water with high detritus?. Journal of Plankton Research, 22: 137–150.

Zhou, M., Zhu, Y., Putnam, S. and Peterson, J. 2001. Mesoscale variability of physical and biological fields in southeastern Lake Superior. Limnol. Oceanogr., 46: 679–688.

Downloads

Published

2010-05-28

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2010): Assessing Great and Large Lakes of the World (GLOW V, Part II)

Section

Research article

License

Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.