Macro-invertebrate species diversity as a potential universal measure of wetland ecosystem integrity in constructed wetlands in South East Melbourne
Keywords:
Shannon-Weiner index, richness, assessment, temporal, indicatorsAbstract
The use of macroinvertebrates in the assessment of wetland ecosystem integrity is an increasingly common tool used for management and conservation. The sensitivity of macroinvertebrates to ecological fluctuation makes them reliable and appealing indicators of ecosystem integrity. However, there is little or no published data available for assessment of wetland ecosystem integrity on the basis of macroinvertebrate species diversity in constructed wetlands of metropolitan Melbourne. The aim of the following study was to assess significant differences in macroinvertebrate diversity in three constructed wetlands in South East metropolitan Melbourne and consequently, suitability as a universal measure of wetland ecosystem integrity.
Three wetlands were chosen randomly, with the requirement that they were entirely man-made, from a list of constructed wetlands in South East metropolitan Melbourne. Between 481 and 629 organisms were found in each wetland comprising 16 different taxa. The one-way ANOVA for species richness (P > 0.05, F = 0.19) and Shannon-Weiner diversity index (P > 0.05, F = 2.54) indicate no significant differences between the wetlands in both of these measures. The data collected in the present study compared with published species richness and Shannon-Weiner diversity index data suggests macroinvertebrate species diversity can be used as a universal measure of wetland ecosystem integrity in constructed wetlands in South East metropolitan Melbourne. This is important where there is need for a rapid and streamlined tool for assessment of ecosystem integrity and consequently, the management and conservation of constructed wetlands.
References
Adamus, P. R. and Brandt, K. 1990. Impact on quality of inland wetlands of the United States: A survey of indicators, techniques and applications of community level bio-monitoring data, Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
Anamaet, E. R., Taylor, J. and Mitsch, W. J. 2005. Macro-invertebrate diversity and abundance in two created wetlands in Ohio, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Azous, A. L. and Horner, R. R. 2001. Wetlands and urbanization: Implications for the future, Florida: CRC Press LLC.
Barber, W. E. and Kevern, N. R. 1973. Ecological factors influencing macroinvertebrate standing crop distribution. Hydrobiologia, 43(1–2): 53–75.
Bennett, J. W. and Whitten, S. M. 2001. Social and private values of wetlands, Canberra, , Australia: Environment Australia and Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.
Boix, D., Sala, J., Gascon, S., Martinoy, M. Gifre, Brucet, J. S., Badosa, A., Lopez-Flores, R. and Quintana, X. D. 2007. Comparative biodiversity of crustaceans and aquatic insects from various water body types in coastal Mediterranean wetlands. Hydrobiologia, 584: 347–359.
Bryant, D. and Papas, P. 2007. Macro-invertebrate communities in artificial wetlands: the influence of macrophytes, Melbourne: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research.
Cyr, H. and Downing, J. A. 1988. The abundance of phytophilous invertebrates on different species of submerged macrophytes. Freshwater Biology, 20: 365–374.
Davis, J. A., Rosich, R. S., Bradley, J. S., Growns, J. E., Schmidt, L. G. and Cheal, F. 1993. Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain –Vol. 6: Wetland classification on the basis of water quality and invertebrate community data, Leederville, Perth: Western Australia Water Authority, EPA. http://www.environment.murdoch.edu.au/groups/aer/reports.html.
Davis, J. A., Horwitz, P., Norris, R., Chessman, B., Mcguire, M., Somer, B. B. and Taylor, K. 1999. Wetland Bio-assessment Manual (Macroinvertebrates), Murdoch, , Western Australia: Aquatic Ecosystems Research – Murdoch University.
De Leo, G. A. and Levin, S. 1997. The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conservation Ecology, 1(1): 3
Kratzer, E. B. and Batzer, D. P. 2007. Spatial and temporal variation in aquatic macroinvertebrates in the Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia, USA. Wetlands, 27(1): 127–140.
Melbourne Water. 2003. Wetland Nature's filter, URL: http://www.education.melbournewater.com.au/content/rivers_and_drainage/wetlands_-naturesfilter/wetlandsnaturesfilter.asp Accessed 4/4/09.
Melbourne Water. 2009. Melbourne: Water Sensitive Urban Design-Case studies. Accessed 7/4/09. URL: http://wsud.melbournewater.com.au/content/case_studies/case_studies.asp
Muli, J. R. 2005. Spatial variation of benthic macroinvertebrates and the environmental factors influencing their distribution in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 8(2): 147–157.
Natural Resource Management (NRM). 2008. Wetland ecosystem condition: macro-invertebrate indicator species, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.nrm.gov.au/publications/factsheets/me-indicators/inland-aquatic/pubs/wetland-condition-species.pdf
Nzengy’a, D. M. and Wishitemi, B. E.L. 2000. Dynamics of benthic macroinvertebrates in created wetlands receiving wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 57(4): 419–436.
Sharma, R.C and Rawat, J. S. 2009. Monitoring of aquatic invertebrates as bio-indicators for assessing the health of wetlands: A case study in the Central Himalayas, India. Ecological Indicators, 9: 118–128.
Spieles, D. J. and Mitsch, W. J. 2000. Macro-invertebrate community structure in high and low nutrient constructed wetlands. Wetlands, 20(4): 716–729.
Sutherland, W. J. 2006. Ecological Census Techniques–, 2nd Ed, New York: Cambridge University Press.
USEPA. 1997. Wetlands: Biological Assessment Methods and Criteria development workshop, Washington, DC: Office of Water, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
USEPA. 2002. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Developing an invertebrate index of biological integrity for wetlands, Washington, DC: Office of Water, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Webb, K. D. and Mitsch, W. J. 2001. Macroinvertebrate diversity and abundance in two experimental wetlands from top-down and bottom-up interpretations, Ohio: Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, Ohio State University.
Wilhm, J. L. and Dorris, T. C. 1968. Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria. Bio-Science, 18(6): 477–481.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
