A comparison of approaches for integrated management in coastal marine areas of Canada with the historical approach used in the Great Lakes (Bay of Quinte)

Authors

  • R. G. Randall Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6
  • M. A. Koops Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6
  • C. K. Minns Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6

Keywords:

conservation objectives, coastal zone, ecosystem-based management, freshwater, valued ecosystem component, knowledge transfer

Abstract

Canadian approaches for ecosystem-based management in coastal marine areas, prompted by Canada's Oceans Act, are similar to and consistent with the long-standing, integrated management of the Bay of Quinte in Lake Ontario. The similarities include the criteria for the identification of ecologically significant areas and habitat, degraded areas, ecologically significant species, depleted or rare species, conservation objectives and ecological indicators to assess the status of ecosystem components. The rationale for integrated management in the Bay of Quinte is compared to marine areas, using the terminology that has been adopted for ocean area-based management in Canada. The three overarching goals of maintaining productivity, preserving biodiversity and protecting habitat are common to both freshwater and marine ecosystems. Communication of science priorities is mutually beneficial for advancing integrated management in both ecosystem types. Identifying the Bay of Quinte as a coastal management area by Great Lakes agencies, using elements of the oceans framework, would demonstrate a transition from a negative (degraded area) to a positive ecosystem status (essential habitat with high productivity and biodiversity).

References

BQRAP (Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan). 1993. Time to act. Stage 2 Report, Ontario Canada, Trenton, ON: Prepared by the BQRAP Coordinating Committee.

Brousseau, C. M., Randall, R. G., Hoyle, J. A. and Minns, C. K. 2011. Fish community indices of ecosystem health: How does the Bay of Quinte compare to other coastal sites in Lake Ontario?. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 14(1): 75–84.

Casselman, J. M., Scott, K. A., Brown, D. M. and Robinson, C. J. 1999. Changes in the relative abundance, variability and stability of fish assemblages of eastern Lake Ontario and the Bay of Quinte –the value of long-term community sampling. Aquat. Ecosys. Health and Manage., 2(3): 255–269.

Chu, C., Minns, C. K., Moore, J. E. and Millard, E. S. 2004. Impact of oligotrophication, temperature, and water levels on walleye habitat in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 133: 868–879.

COSEWIC. 2006a. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (Lake Ontario population) in Canada, Ottawa: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.

COSEWIC. 2006b. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens in Canada, Ottawa, ON: Committee on the status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.

Crowder, A. A. and Bristow, J. M. 1986. “Aquatic macrophytes in the Bay of Quinte, 1972–82”. In Project Quinte: point-sources phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C.K., Hurley, D.A. and Nichols, K.H. 114–127. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 86.

DFO. 2004. Identification of Ecological and Biological Significant Areas, DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Ecosystem Status Rep. 2004/006.

DFO. 2005. Canada's Oceans Action Plan For Present and Future Generations, Ottawa: Communications Branch.

DFO. 2006a. Identification of ecologically significant species and community properties, DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2006/041.

DFO. 2006b. A harvest strategy compliant with the Precautionary Approach, DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2006/023.

DFO. 2007a. Guidance document on identifying conservation priorities and phrasing conservation objectives for Large Ocean Management areas, Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2007/010.

DFO. 2007b. Beaufort Sea Large Ocean Management Area, Winnipeg, Manitoba: Ecosystem Overview and Assessment Report.

DFO. 2008. Further guidance on the formulation, prioritization and use of conservation objectives in an ecosystem approach to integrated management of human activities in aquatic ecosystems, DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2008/029.

Dietrich, J. P., Morrison, B. J. and Hoyle, J. A. 2006. Alternative ecological pathways in the eastern Lake Ontario food web—round goby in the diet of lake trout. J. Great Lakes Res., 32: 395–400.

Gavaris, S. 2009. Fisheries management planning and support for strategic and tactical decisions in an ecosystem approach context. Fisheries Research, 100: 6–14.

German, M. and Stride, F. 2003. Bay of Quinte RAP Monitoring and Delisting Strategy. IBU Assessment Statements 2003, Trenton, ON: Bay of Quinte RAP Restoration Council.

Hart, J. L. 1930. The spawning and early life history of the whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis (Mitchell) in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario. Contri. Can. Biol. Fish., VI(20): 427–444.

Hartig, J. H., Zarull, M. A., Reynoldson, T. B., Mikol, G., Harris, V. A., Randall, R. G. and Cairns, V. W. 1997. Quantifying targets for rehabilitating degraded areas of the Great Lakes. Envirn. Manage., 21: 713–723.

Hurley, D. A., Christie, W. J., Minns, C. K., Millard, E. S., Cooley, J. M., Johnson, M. G., Nicholls, K. H., Robinson, G. W., Owen, G. E., Sly, P. G., Geiling, W. T. and Crowder, A. A. 1986. “Trophic structure and interactions in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, before and after point-source phosphorus control”. In Project Quinte: point-source phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C.K., Hurley, D.A. and Nicholls, K.H. 259–270. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 86.

International Joint Commission (IJC). 1987. “Protocol for the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement”. In Annex 2: Great Lakes Areas of Concern and Remedial Action Plans, Windsor, ON: International Joint Commission. (www.ijc.org/en/activities/consultations/glwqa/guide_3_3.htm)

IJC. 1991. Commission approves list/delist criteria for Great Lakes Areas of Concern. www.ijc.org/rel/focus/listdelist/

Johanson, P. and McNevin, B. 2007. A fish habitat management plan for the Bay of Quinte, Trenton, ON: Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan.

Kipp, R. M. and Ricciardi, A. 2010. Hemimysis anomala, Gainesville, FL: USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. (http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/GreatLakes/SpeciesInfo.asp)

Koops, M. A., Dermott, R. M., Leisti, K. E., Johannsson, O. E., Millard, E. S., Minns, C. K., Munawar, M., Nicholls, K. H. and Hoyle, J. A. 2009. The Bay of Quinte: a model for large lake ecosystem management. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 30: 1024–1029.

MacKenzie, B. R., Myers, R. A. and Bowen, K. G. 2003. Spawner-recruit relationships and fish stock carrying capacity in aquatic ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 248: 209–220.

Mills, E. L., Leach, J. H., Carlton, J. T. and Secor, C. L. 1993. Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. J. Great Lakes Res., 19: 1–54.

Minns, C. K. 1995. Approaches to assessing and managing cumulative ecosystem change, with the Bay of Quinte as a case study. J. Aquat. Ecosystem Health, 4: 1–24.

Minns, C. K. 1999. The ecosystem pyramid and the means for attaining ecological sustainability: an essay in honour of Jack Christie. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 2(2): 209–221.

Minns, C. K. and Hurley, D. A. 1986. “Population dynamics and production of white perch, Morone americana, in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario”. In Project Quinte: point-source phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C.K., Hurley, D.A. and Nicholls, K.H. 215–223. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 86: 270 p..

Minns, C. K. and Wischert, G. A. 2005. A framework for defining fish habitat domains in Lake Ontario and its drainage. J. Great Lakes Res., 31(Suppl. 1): 6–27.

Minns, C. K., Hurley, D. A. and Nicholls, K. H. 1986. Project Quinte: point-source phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 86

Minns, C. K., Cairns, V. W., Randall, R. G. and Moore, J. E. 1994. An Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes' Areas of Concern. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51: 1804–1822.

Morrison, H., Minns, C. K. and Koonce, J. F. 2001. A methodology for identifying aquatic biodiversity investment areas: application in the Great Lakes basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 4(1): 1–12.

Rice, J. and Sutton, V. 2007. National Science Workshop: Ecosystem Indicators. Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Proc. Ser., 2007/045

Scott, W. B. and Christie, W. J. 1963. The invasion of the lower Great Lakes by the white perch, Roccus americanus (Gmelin). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 20: 1189–1195.

Scott, W. B. and Crossman, E. J. 1998. Freshwater Fishes of Canada, Oakville, ON: Galt House Publications.

Sly, P. 1986. “Review of postglacial environmental changes and cultural impacts in the Bay of Quinte”. In Project Quinte: point-sources phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C.K., Hurley, D.A. and Nichols, K.H. 7–26. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 86.

UNEP/GRID-Arendal. 2002. The DPSIR Framework, UNEP/ GRID Maps and Graphics library. (http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/the_dpsir_framework).

Published

2011-02-28