Monitoring land cover change in the Lake Superior basin
Keywords:
Great Lakes, land use change, National Land Cover Data, Ontario Provincial Land Cover, Binational Land CoverAbstract
Consistent, repeatable and broadly applicable land use, land cover data is needed across the Lake Superior basin to facilitate ecosystem condition assessment and trend analysis. Such a data set collected regularly through time could inform and focus field monitoring efforts, and help prioritize restoration and mitigation efforts. Unfortunately, few data sets exist that are bi-nationally consistent in time, classification method, or resolution. To this end, we integrated land cover data across both the Canadian (Ontario Provincial Land Cover data) and US portions (National Land Cover Data) of the Lake Superior basin for two time steps (approximately 1992 and 2001) roughly one decade apart. After harmonizing landcover classes across the two datasets we compared the explicit amount and relative amount (total hectares and proportion of each area as percents) for each of the common land cover classes that occurred across the two time steps for the entire Lake Superior basin, for the U.S. portion of the Lake Superior basin only, and for the Canadian portion of the Lake Superior basin only. We also compared land cover change for the entire basin within a 1 km and a 10 km buffer of the Great Lakes shoreline. We then summarized and compared these land cover types for each time period across a common set of watersheds derived from elevation data (Hollenhorst et al., 2007) for the entire Lake Superior basin. This allowed us to identify and quantify the types of change occurring generally across the entire basin, more specifically across both the U.S. and Canadian portions of the basin, and more explicitly for near coastal areas and watersheds across the entire basin. Noteworthy changes were detected across the basin, particularly an increase in mixed forest types and a corresponding decrease in coniferous forest types.
References
Andren, H. 1994. Effect of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71: 355–366.
Austin, J. A. and Colman, S. M. 2007. Lake superior summer water temperatures are increasing more rapidly than air temperature: A positive ice-albedo feedback. Geophysical Research Letter, 34 L06604, doi:10.1029/2006GL029021
ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute). 2010. ArcMap 10, Redlands, California: ESRI.
Jaeger, J. A.G. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecol., 15: 115–130.
Jaeger, J. A.G., Bertiller, R., Schwick, C., Muller, K., Steinmeier, C., Ewald, K. C. and Ghazou, I.J. 2008. Implementing landscape fragmentation as an indicator in the Swiss monitoring system of sustainable development (MONET). J. Env. Manage., : 737–751.
Hagan, J. W., Vander Haegen, W. M. and McKinley, P. S. 1996. The early development of forest fragmentation effects on birds. Conservation Biol., 10: 188–202.
Hollenhorst, T., Brown, T. N., Johnson, L. B., Ciborowski, J. J. H. and Host, G. E. 2007. Methods for generating multi-scale watershed delineations for indicator development in Great Lake coastal ecosystems. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 33(Special Issue 3): 13–26.
Morrice, J. A., Danz, N. P., Regal, R. R., Kelly, J. R., Niemi, G. J., Reavie, E. D., Hollenhorst, T., Axler, R. P., Trebitz, A. S., Cotter, A. M. and Peterson, G. S. 2008. Human influences on water quality in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Environ. Manage., 41: 347–357.
Peckham, S. D., Chipman, J. W., Lillesand, T. M. and Dodson, S. I. 2006. Alternate stable states and the shape of the lake trophic distribution. Hydrobiologia, 571(1): 401–407.
Riitters, K. H., Wickham, J. D. and Coulston, J. W. 2004. Use of road maps in United States national assessments of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc, 9(2): 13 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art13
SOLEC. 2009. State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference (SOLEC) Reports. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Canada. http://www.epa.gov/solec
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Lake Superior Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) 2006. http://epa.gov/glnpo/lakesuperior/2006
Venier, L. A., Pearce, J. L., McKee, J. E., McKenney, D. W. and Niemi, G. J. 2004. Climate and satellite-derived land cover for predicting breeding bird distribution in the Great Lakes basin. Journal of Biogeography, 31: 315–331.
Verry, E. S. 2000. “Land Fragmentation and Impacts to Streams and Fish in the Central and Upper Midwest”. In Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters 2000 National Convention, 38–44. Wash: American Society of Foresters. 2000 November, 16–20
Wickham, J. D., Ritters, K. H., Wade, T. G. and Coulston, J. W. 2007. Temporal change in forest fragmentation at multiple scales. Landscape Ecol., 22: 481–489.
WI Lake Superior Basin Partner Team. 2007. Hydrologic Condition of the Marengo River Watershed. http://basineducation.uwex.edu/lakesuperior/pdf/marengo/Appendix2-MarengoTestCase.pdf
Wolter, P., Johnston, C. A. and Niemi, G. J. 2006. Land use, land cover change in the U.S. Great Lakes basin 1992-2001. J. Great Lakes Res., 32: 607–628.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
