Marine debris composition and abundance: A case study of selected beaches in Port Dickson, Malaysia

Authors

  • A. K. Khairunnisa Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • S. H. Fauziah Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • P. Agamuthu Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Keywords:

marine pollution, litter, recreational beach, fishing beach, solid waste

Abstract

Malaysia has a long coastline and is well known for its beautiful beaches which play different roles, depending on the characteristics and location. With increasing population and rapid development, the beaches are experiencing threats from pollution. One of the most visible threats is due to solid waste disposal. A scientific quantitative dataset of marine debris in Malaysia is, however, very rare. Therefore, a study on marine debris was conducted on two beaches in Port Dickson, Malaysia, from January to March 2010. The objective of the study was to compare the density of waste on two selected beaches with different economic activities.

Teluk Kemang and Pasir Panjang are recreational and fishing beaches, respectively. Pasir Panjang received at least 2 units of debris for every 2 m2 (0.495 ± 0.108 items m−2), weighing 46.079 ± 12.507 g m−2. Debris found in Teluk Kemang was lower than that of Pasir Panjang with 1 unit of waste for every 2 m2 (0.262 ± 0.045 items m−2), weighing 2.067 ± 1.238 g m−2. Based on the number of items, plastics were the most abundant type of debris at 64% in Teluk Kemang and 46% in Pasir Panjang. In terms of weight, paper was higher (48%) than plastic (43%) in Teluk Kemang, while the highest percentage of debris found on Pasir Panjang beach was bulky waste (54%). The number of items and weight of debris were higher in Pasir Panjang due to the abundance of huge and heavy abandoned nets from fishing activities left on the beach. Daily clean-ups of Teluk Kemang, a popular recreational beach, contributed to significantly lower amounts of debris found there. On the whole, types of waste found on both beaches were similar. However, the percentage and amount of each waste's type varied between the two beaches. The results indicated that the density of waste is highly dependable on the economic activities of the relevant beaches.

References

Agamuthu, P., Fauziah, S. H. and Kahlil, K. 2009. Evolution of solid waste management in Malaysia: impacts and implications of the solid waste bill, 2007. Journal of Material Cycles & Waste Management, 11: 96–103.

Arnould, J. P.Y. and Croxall, J. P. 1995. Trends and entanglement of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazelle) in man-made debris at South Georgia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30(11): 707–712.

Boren, L. J., Morrisey, M., Muller, C. G. and Gemmell, N. J. 2006. Entanglement of New Zealand fur seals in man-made debris at Kaikoura, New Zealand. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52: 442–446.

Bravo, M., Gallardo, M. A., Luna-Jorquera, G., Núñez, P, Vásquez, N. and Thiel, M. 2009. Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): Results from a national survey supported by volunteers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58: 1718–1726.

Cho, D. O. 2009. The incentive program for fishermen to collect marine debris in Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58: 415–417.

Claereboudt, M. R. 2004. Shore litter along sandy beaches of the Gulf of Oman. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49: 770–777.

Department of Fisheries. 2011. Available online: http://www.dof.gov.my/

Derraik, J. G.B. 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44: 842–852.

Frost, A. and Cullen, M. 1997. Marine debris on Northern New South Wales beaches (Australia): Sources and the role of beach usage. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 34(5): 348–352.

Hall, K. 2002. Impacts of marine debris and oil: Economics and social costs to coastal communities. Report published by Kommunenes Internatsjonala Miljøorganisation, (KIMO; Local Authorities International Environmental Organisation),

Hanni, K. D. and Pyle, P. 2000. Entanglement of pinnipeds in synthetic materials at South-east Farallon Island, California, 1976-1998. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(12): 1076–1081.

Hari Tanpa, Plastik Bag. 2010. Available online. http://www.selangor.gov.my/haritanpabegplastik/,

Hess, N. A., Ribic, C. A. and Vining, I. 1999. Benthic marine debris, with an emphasis on fishery-related items, surrounding Kodiak Island, Alaska, 1994-1996. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38(10): 885–890.

Jones, M. M. 1995. Fishing debris in the Australian marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30(1): 25–33.

Latifah, A. M., Mohd Armi, A. S. and Nur Ilyana, M. Z. 2009. Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: Practices and challenges. Waste Management, 29: 2902–2906.

Madzena, A. and Lasiak, T. 1997. Spatial and temporal variations in beach litter on the Transkei Coast of South Africa. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 34(11): 900–907.

Moore, E., Lyday, S., Roletto, J., Litle, K., Parrish, J. K., Nevins, H., Harvey, J., Mortenson, J., Greig, D., Piazza, M., Hermance, A., Lee, D., Adams, D, Allen, S. and Kell, S. 2009. Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the North-west coast of the United States 2001-2005. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58: 1045–1051.

Moore, S. L., Gregorio, D., Carreon, M., Weisberg, S. B. and Leecaster, M. K. 2001. Composition and distribution of beach debris in Orange County, California. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42(3): 241–245.

Ofiara, D. D. and Seneca, J. J. 2006. Biological effects and subsequent economic effects and losses from marine pollution and degradations in marine environments: Implications from the literature. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 52: 844–864.

Page, B., McKenzie, J., McIntosh, R., Baylis, A., Morissey, A., Calvert, N, Hease, T., Berris, M, Dowie, D., Shaughnessy, P. D. and Goldsworthy, S. D. 2004. Entanglement of Australian sea lions and New Zealand fur seals in lost fishing gear and other marine debris before and after Government and industry attempts to reduce the problem. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49: 33–42.

Philips, M. R. and House, C. 2009. An evaluation of priorities for beach tourism: Case studies from South Wales, UK. Tourism Management, 30: 176–183.

Raum-Suryan, K. L., Jemison, L. A. and Pitcher, K. W. 2009. Entanglement of Steller sea lions (Enmetopias jubatus) in marine debris: Identifying causes and finding solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(10): 1487–1495.

Sazima, I., Gadig, O. B.F., Namora, R. C. and Matta, F. S. 2002. Plastic debris collars on juvenile carcharhinid sharks (Rhizoprionodon lalandil) in Southwest Atlantic. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44(10): 1149–1151.

Shahidul Islam, M. and Tanaka, M. 2004. Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystem including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: A review and synthesis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48: 624–649.

The Encyclopedia of Earth. 2010. Available online. http://www.eoearth.org/article/Malaysia_-_Coastal_and_Marine_Ecosystem_Factsheet_(WRI),

Tomás, J., Guitart, R., Mateo, R. and Raga, J. A. 2002. Marine debris ingestion in loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, from the Western Meditteranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44: 211–216.

Tourinho, P. S, Ivar do Sul, J. A. and Fillman, G. 2009. Is marine debris ingestion still a problem for the coastal marine biota of southern Brazil?. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(3): 396–401.

UNEP,. 2005. Marine Litter, an analytical overview, Kenya: Nairobi.

Uneputty, P. and Evans, S. M. 1997. The impact of plastic debris on the biota of tidal flats in Ambon Bay (Eastern Indonesia). Marine Environmental Research, 49(3): 233–242.

Yaw, F. Jr. 2005. Cleaner technologies for sustainable tourism: Caribbean case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13: 117–134.

Published

2012-07-01