Effects of water levels and water level regulation on the supply of suitable spawning habitat for eight fish guilds in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario
Keywords:
habitat suitability, habitat supply, water level regime, wetlands, Great LakesAbstract
Lake Ontario water levels are regulated under the International Joint Commission's Order of Approval. We assessed the availability of spawning habitat for eight fish guilds (grouped by vegetation and spawning temperature preferences) that use nearshore habitat in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, under regulated and pre-project water level scenarios. Our model used habitat characteristics of depth, substrate, vegetation cover and temperature across 14,876 habitat units and guild-based habitat suitabilities to assess the weighted suitable area (WSA) available for spawning. During the modelled 1951–2000 period, regulated water levels were on average 0.25 m lower than pre-project levels and varied about half as much. Overall, the large and shallow upper bay within the Bay of Quinte benefited from pre-project flows whereas the smaller and deeper lower bay benefited from regulated flows. Higher variance in water levels increased highly suitable wetland area and higher mean water levels increased the availability of shallow flooded area in the upper and middle bays, where the bathymetry is gradually sloping. The number of days over which WSA was available was generally greater for high temperature guilds, and appeared to decrease when temperature mismatches occurred in a season. Results emphasize the complexity of the relationship between fish habitat supply and water level regime.
References
Cudmore-Vokey, B. and Minns, C. K. 2002. Reproductive ecology and vegetation association databases for Lake Ontario Fishes. Can. MS Rpt. Fish. Aquat. Sci., : 2607
DFO. 1986. “The Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Policy for the Management of Fish Habitat”. Ottawa, ON: DFO.
Doka, S., Bakelaar, C. and Bouvier, L. 2006. “Coastal wetland fish community assessment of climate change in the Lower Great Lakes”. In Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Communities: Vulnerabilities to Climate Change and Response to Adaptation Strategies Edited by: Mortsch, L., Ingram, J., Hebb, A. and Doka, S. 101–127. 2006 Final report submitted to the Climate change Impacts and Adaptation Program, Natural Resources Canada. Environment Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Toronto, Ontario,. http://www.environment.uwaterloo.ca/research/aird/aird_pub/Great_Lakes_Coastal_Wetlands_Report_2006.pdf
Eakins, R. J. 2011. Ontario Freshwater Fishes Life History Database. Version 4.01. On-line database (http://www.fishdb.ca), accessed 19 October 2011
Farrell, J. M., Mead, J. V. and Murry, B. A. 2006. Protracted spawning of St. Lawrence River Northern Pike (Esox lucius): simulated effects on survival, growth, and production. Ecol. Freshw. Fish., 15: 169–179.
Farrell, J. M., Murry, B. A., Leopold, D., Halpern, A., Rippke, M. B., Godwin, K. S. and Hafner, S. D. 2010. Water-level regulation and coastal wetland vegetation in the upper St. Lawrence River: inferences from historical aerial imagery, seed banks, and Typha dynamics. Hydrobiologia, 647: 127–144.
Graniero, P. A. 2001. “The effect of spatiotemporal sampling strategies and data acquisition accuracy on the characterization of dynamic ecological systems and their behaviours”. University of Toronto. PhD thesis
Hudon, C., Wilcox, D. and Ingram, J. 2006. Modelling wetland plant community response to assess water-level regulation scenarios in the Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Basin. Environ. Monit. Assess., 113: 303–328.
Hurley, D. A. 1986. “Fish populations of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, before and after phosphorus control. 201–214”. In Project Quinte: point-source phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C. K., Hurley, D. A. and Nicholls, K. H. 86Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci..
Johanson, P. and McNevin, B. 2007. A fish habitat management plan for the Bay of Quinte. Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan, http://www.bqrap.ca/cms_lib/Fish%20Habitat%20April_13_2007.pdf
Jude, D. J. and Pappas, J. 1992. Fish utilization of Great Lakes coastal wetlands. J. Great Lakes Res, 18: 651–672.
Keddy, P. A. 2000. Wetland ecology: principles and conservation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keddy, P. A. and Reznicek, A. A. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. J. Great Lakes Res., 12: 25–36.
Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Study Board. 2006. Options for managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels and flows. Final Report to the International Joint Commission. www.losl.org/PDF/report-main-e.pdf
Lane, J. A., Portt, C. B. and Minns, C. K. 1996. Spawning habitat characteristics of Great Lakes fishes. Can MS Rep Fish Aquat Sci., : 2368
Leira, M. and Cantonati, M. 2008. Effects of water-level fluctuations on lake: an annotated bibliography. Hydrobiologia, 613: 171–184.
Leisti, K. E., Doka, S. E. and Minns, C. K. 2012. Submerged aquatic vegetation in the Bay of Quinte: Response to decreased phosphorus loading and Zebra Mussel invasion. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt, 15(4): 442–452.
Limno-Tech, Inc. 2005. “Development of an integrated ecological response model (IERM) for the Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Study”. Prepared for the International Joint Commission. http://www.limno.com/ierm/IERM_report_draft-042905.pdf
Minns, C. K. and Bakelaar, C. N. 1999. “A method for quantifying the supply of suitable habitat for fish stocks in Lake Erie”. In State of Lake Erie: Past, Present and Future, Edited by: Munawar, M., Edsall, T. and Munawar, I. F. 481–496. the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.
Minns, C. K., Moore, J. E., Stoneman, M. and Cudmore-Vokey, B. 2001. Defensible Methods of Assessing Fish Habitat: Lacustrine Habitats in the Great Lakes Basin – Conceptual Basis and Approach Using a Habitat Suitability Matrix (HSM) Method. Can. MS Rpt. Fish. Aquat. Sci., : 2559
Minns, C. K., Bernard, A., Bakelaar, C. N. and Ewaschuk, M. 2006. A fish habitat classification model for the Upper and Middle Sections of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. MS Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., : 22748
Moin, S. M.A. and Thompson, A. 2006. “Long term water temperature modelling in the Bay of Quinte, Ontario”. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on HydroScience and Engineering 10–13. Philadelphia, PA 2006 September
Mortsch, L. D. 1998. Assessing the impact of climate change on the Great Lakes shoreline wetlands. Climate Change., 40: 391–416.
Randall, R. G., Koops, M. A. and Minns, C. K. 2011. A comparison of approaches for integrated management of coastal marine areas of Canada with the historical approach used in the Great Lakes (Bay of Quinte). Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt., 14(1): 104–113.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2010. Bay of Quinte Fisheries Management Plan. Final Version http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@letsfish/documents/document/251958.pdf
Scheffer, M., de Redelijkhied, M. R. and Noppert, F. 1992. Distribution and dynamics of submerged vegetation in a chain of shallow eutrophic lakes. Aquat. Bot., 42: 199–216.
Schindler, D. W. 2001. The cumulative effects of climate warming and other human stresses on Canadian freshwaters in the new millennium. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58: 18–29.
Seifried, K. E. 2002. “Submerged macrophytes in the Bay of Quinte: 1972 to 2000”. Department of Zoology, University of Toronto. M.Sc. Thesis
Stewart, C. J. 2002. A revised geomorphic, shore protection and nearshore classification of the Canadian and United States shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River. Coastal task working group summary report to the International Joint Commission http://www.cjscons.com/downloads/IJCONT/2002%20Shore%20Classification%20Report.pdf
Wilcox, D. A. and Xie, Y. 2007. Predicted wetland plant community responses to proposed water-level-regulation plans for Lake Ontario: GIS-based modelling. J. Great Lakes Res., 33: 751–773.
Zar, J. H. 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th Ed., Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall Inc..
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
