Assessing the fish consumption beneficial use impairment in the Bay of Quinte
Keywords:
contaminants, bioaccumulation, delisting criteria, Area of Concern, Great Lakes fishAbstract
The state of contamination in Bay of Quinte fish was assessed to determine whether delisting criteria have been met, and to recommend further studies/actions to be undertaken. We examined fish contaminant data collected by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment between 1975 and 2008 for seven sites in Lake Ontario including the Bay of Quinte. Where sufficient data was available, we tested for differences in recent years by examining the post-1998 data for Walleye, Smallmouth Bass, Yellow Perch and Brown Bullhead. Our analysis specifically focused on known contaminants of concern within the Bay of Quinte: polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury (Hg), as well as Mirex which is known to originate from Lake Ontario. Insufficient data was available for the examination of total TEQs (dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs). When appropriate, we used the general linear model (GLM) to compare contaminant concentrations among sites as a function of fish length. When no significant relationship between contaminant concentration and fish length was found, mean values among sites were compared using analysis of variance. While there were no significant differences for the majority of contaminants among sites, some species and contaminant combinations at one or more of the Bay of Quinte sites had elevated fish concentrations compared to some reference sites. For instance, mercury concentrations in Yellow Perch and Brown Bullhead at Quinte sites exceeded those from some reference sites. Current consumption restrictions for Brown Bullhead and Yellow Perch are more severe in the Upper Bay of Quinte compared to the other sites, indicating impacts of local sources. As a result, the fish consumption beneficial use impairment continues to be classified as impaired for the Bay of Quinte. As many sport fish such as Walleye and Smallmouth Bass are large, long-lived and potentially wide-ranging species, it is difficult to link contaminant concentrations to local sources. To investigate the impact of sources within the Upper Bay of Quinte, comparison of contaminants in sentinel fish collected on the same scale as the source of the contamination is recommended.
References
Apeti, D. A. and Lauenstein, G. G. 2006. An Assessment of Mirex Concentrations along the Southern Shorelines of the Great Lakes, USA. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2(3): 95–103.
Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee. 1990. Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan, Stage I Report. Environmental Setting and Problem Definition., 219. Bay of Quinte RAP, Trenton, ON. Accessed online at http://www.bqrap.ca/publications/documentlibrary
Bhavsar, S. P., Fletcher, R., Hayton, A., Reiner, E. J. and Jackson, D. A. 2007a. Composition of dioxin-like PCBs in fish: An application for risk assessment. Envi. Sci. Technol., 41(9): 3096–3102.
Bhavsar, S. P., Hayton, A., Reiner, E. J. and Jackson, D. A. 2007b. Estimating dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl toxic equivalents from total polychlorinated biphenyl measurements in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 26(8): 1622–1628.
Bhavsar, S. P., Jackson, D. A., Hayton, A., Reiner, E. J., Chen, T. and Bodnar, J. 2007c. Are PCB levels in fish from the Canadian Great Lakes still declining?. J. Great Lakes Res., 33(3): 592–605.
Bhavsar, S. P., Awad, E., Fletcher, R., Hayton, A., Somers, K. M., Kolic, T., MacPherson, K. and Reiner, E. J. 2008. Temporal trends and spatial distribution of dioxins and furans in Lake Trout or lake whitefish from the Canadian Great Lakes. Chemosphere, 73: S158–S165.
Bhavsar, S. P., Gewurtz, S. B., McGoldrick, D. J., Keir, M. J. and Backus, S. M. 2010. Changes in Mercury Levels in Great Lakes fish between 1970s and 2007. Envi. Sci. Technol., 44: 3273–3279.
Bowlby, J. N., Hoyle, J. A., Lantry, J. R. and Morrison, B. J. 2010. The Status of Walleye in Lake Ontario, 1988–2006. Comm. Tech. Rep., : 69 In: Proceedings of the 2006 Symposium. Roseman, E., Kocovsky, P., Vandergoot, C. (Eds.), Great Lakes Fish
Borgmann, U. and Whittle, M. 1991. Contaminant concentration trends in Lake Ontario Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush); 1977 to 1988. J. Great Lakes Res., 17: 368–381.
Cruickshank, D. 2007. Bay of Quinte Sediment Sampling Results, MEMORANDUM, Prepared for Trent River Technical Committee, Ministry of the Environment, Technical Support Group Eastern Region, Kingston, ON
Diamond, M., Mackay, D., Poulton, D. and Stride, F. 1996. Assessing chemical behavior and developing remedial actions using a mass balance model of chemical fate in the Bay of Quinte. Water Research, 30: 405–421.
Dillon Consulting Limited. 2007. Ecological Risk Assessment for the Trent River Mouth Sediment Depositional Areas Final Report May 31, 2007, Parts 1 and 2 Submitted to: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Dillon Project #07-7375
Ferguson, M. L. and Metcalfe, C. D. 1989. Distribution of PCB congeners in sediments of the Otonabee River-Rice Lake system, Peterborough. CanadaChemosphere, 19: 1321–1328.
Fletcher, R. and Petro, S. 2005. Biomonitoring Study of the Bakelite Property, Belleville, Ontario, 2002 Prepared by: Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ministry of the Environment, April 2005
Gandhi, N., Diamond, M. L., Razavi, R., Bhavsar, S. P. and Hodge, E. 2011. A modeling assessment of contaminant fate in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario: Part 1. Metals. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 14(1): 85–93.
Gobas, F. P.C., Z’graggen, M. N. and Zhang, X. 1995. Time response of Lake Ontario ecosystem to virtual elimination of PCBs. Environ. Sci. Technol, 29: 2038–2048.
Golder and Associates Ltd. and GlobalTox International Consultants Inc. 2001. The Moira River Study Summary Report. Prepared for the Ministry of the Environment, Kingston, ON
Hickey, M. B.C., Ridal, J. J. and Mattice, J. 2006. Analysis of contaminants in fish from the Bay of Quinte Area of Concern. Prepared for the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan. Lower Trent Conservation Authority, Trenton, ON
Hickey, M. B.C., Ridal, J. J. and Veenstra, C. 2009. Recommendations for Assessing Fish Contaminant Sources in the Bay of Quinte Area of Concern. Prepared for the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan. Lower Trent Conservation Authority, Trenton, ON
Huestis, S. Y., Servos, M. R., Whittle, D. M., Van De Heuvel, M. and Dixon, D. G. 1997. Evaluation of temporal and age-related trends in concentrations of chemically and biologically generated 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents in Lake Ontario Lake Trout, 1977 to 1993. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 16: 154–164.
Marvin, C. H., Charlton, M. N., Reiner, E. J., Kolic, T., MacPherson, K., Stern, G. A., Braekevelt, E., Estenik, J. F., Thiessen, L. and Painter, S. 2002. Surficial sediment contamination in Lakes Erie and Ontario: A comparative analysis. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 28: 437–450.
Milani, D. and Grapentine, L. 2007. Assessment of Sediment Dioxin/Furan and Dioxin-Like PCB Contamination and Biological Impacts in the Lower Trent River. WSTD Contribution No., : 08–503.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2009. Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish, 2009–2010. 25th Edition, Toronto, Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Rasmussen, J. B., Rowan, D. J., Lean, D. R.S. and Carey, J. H. 1990. Food chain structure in Ontario lakes determines PCB concentrations in Lake Trout and other pelagic fish. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 47: 2030–2038.
Thorburn, M. 2004. Sediment Survey Trent River and Trent River Estuary, Moira River and Belleville Waterfront. Draft Technical Memorandum. Water Monitoring Section Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment March 8, 2004
van den Berg, M, Birnbaum, L S, Denison, M, De Vito, M, Farland, W, Feeley, M, Fiedler, H, Hakansson, H, Hanberg, A, Haws, L, Rose, M, Safe, S, Schrenk, D, Tohyama, C, Tritscher, A, Tuomisto, J, Tysklind, M, Walker, N and Peterson, EE. 2006. The 2005 World Health Organization re-evaluation of human and mammalian Toxic Equivalency Factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol. Sci., 93: 223–241. 2006
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.