An integrated approach to identifying ecosystem recovery targets: Application to the Bay of Quinte

Authors

  • E. A. Blukacz-Richards Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada
  • M. A. Koops Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada

Keywords:

Areas of Concern, Ecopath, mass-balance, Beneficial Use Impairment, Remedial Action Plans, restoration targets

Abstract

In 1985, the International Joint Commission identified the Bay of Quinte as an Area of Concern due to its degraded ecosystem. A Remediation Action Plan was established with delisting targets including the goals of decreasing phosphorous loading and restoring the upper (fish and wildlife) and lower (phytoplankton, zooplankton, and benthic invertebrates) trophic levels. We examined the consistency among seven Remedial Action Plan targets using Ecopath, a mass-balance model, for the upper Bay of Quinte for the post Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion period (1995–2002). We quantified the trophic consequences of bottom-up-control by gradually reducing the phytoplankton biomass until the Ecopath model became unbalanced (27% reduction). Replicate (n = 25) mass-balance solutions consistently showed that reductions in Zebra Mussel biomass were necessary to achieve mass-balance. This bottom-up control met the nutrient (total phosphorus), fish, benthic invertebrates, and phytoplankton population RAP targets. Based on these consistent results, it is recommended that future modelling efforts examine the effects of further phytoplankton biomass reductions.

References

Blukacz, E. A., Koops, M. A., Sutton, T. M., Arts, T. M., Fitzsimons, J. D., Muir, A. M., Claramunt, R. M., Johnson, T. B., Kinnunen, R. E., Ebener, M. P., Suski, C. and Burness, G. 2010. Linking Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) condition with male gamete quality and quantity. J. Great Lakes Res., 36: 78–83.

Browman, H. I. and Stergiou, K. I. 2004. Perspectives on ecosystem-based approaches to the management of marine resources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 274: 269–303.

Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J. and Strayer, D. L. 2006. Top-down control from the bottom: regulation of eutrophication in a large river by benthic grazing. Limnol. Oceanogr., 51: 664–670.

Christensen, V. and Walters, C. J. 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model., 172: 109–139.

Francis, R. C., Hixon, M. A., Clark, M. E., Murawski, S. A. and Ralston, S. 2007. Ten commandments for ecosystem-based fisheries scientists. Fisheries, 32: 217–233.

Hall, S. J. and Mainprize, B. 2004. Towards ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fish Fisheries, 5: 1–20.

Invertebrates as Indicators. USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/bioiweb1/html/invertebrate.html. Accessed 25 August 2012.

Johnson, M. G. and Hurley, D. A. 1986. Overview of Project Quinte – 1972–82. In: Project Quinte: point source phosphorus control and ecosystem response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish Aquat. Sci., 85: 1–6.

Kane, D. D., Gordon, S. I., Munawar, M., Charlton, M. N. and Culver, D. A. 2008. A planktonic index of biotic integrity (P-IBI) for Lake Erie: A new technique for checking the pulse of Lake Erie. In: M. Munawar and R. Heath (Eds.), Checking the Pulse of Lake Erie. pp. 347–367. Ecovision World Monograph Series, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society, Burlington, ON.

Kavanagh, P., Newlands, N., Christensen, V. and Pauly, D. 2004. Automated parameter optimization for Ecopath ecosystem models. Ecol. Modell., 172: 141–149.

Koops, M. A., Irwin, B. J., MacNeil, J. E., Millard, E. S. and Mills, E. L. Comparative ecosystem modelling of the ecosystem impacts of exotic invertebrates and productivity changes on fisheries in the Bay of Quinte and Oneida Lake. Great Lakes Fishery Commission Project Completion Report, Ann Arbor, MI,

Koops, M. A., Dermott, R. M., Leisti, K. E., Johannsson, O. E., Millard, E. S., Minns, C. K., Munawar, M., Nicholls, K. H. and Hoyle, J. A. 2009. The Bay of Quinte: a model for large lake ecosystem management. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol, 30: 1024–1029.

Lake, P. S., Bond, N. and Reich, P. 2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshw. Biol., 52: 597–615.

Madenjian, C. P. 1995. Removal of algae by the Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population in western Lake Erie: a bioenergetics approach. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52: 381–390.

McLaughlin, R. L., Smyth, E. R.B., Castro-Santos, T., Jones, M. L., Koops, M. A., Pratt, T. C. and Vélez-Espino, L. A. 2012. Unintended consequences and trade-offs of fish passage. Fish Fisheries, doi:10.1111/faf.12003

Millard, S. and Burley, M. 2004. “Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll a and Light Extinction”. 21–38. Kingston, ON, , Canada: Bay of QuinteRemedial Action Plan. Monitoring Report #13. Project Quinte Annual Report 2002

Minns, C. K., Cairns, V. W., Randall, R. G. and Moore, J. E. 1994. An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes’ Areas of Concern. Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51: 1804–1822.

Minns, C. K., Munawar, M., Koops, M. A. and Millard, E. S. 2011. Long-term ecosystem studies in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, 1972–2008: a prospectus. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 14(1): 3–8.

Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models, Fourth Ed, New York: McGraw Hill.

Pauly, D., Christensen, V. and Walters, C. 2000. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57: 697–706.

Peterson, C. H. and Lipcius, R. N. 2003. Conceptual progress towards predicting quantitative ecosystem benefits of ecological restorations. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 264: 297–307.

Planktonic state indicators. USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/med/grosseile_site/indicators/plankton.html. Accessed 25 August 2012.

Project Quinte Annual Report. 2005. “Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Monitoring Report 16.”. Kingston, ON, , Canada

Ryder, D. S. and Miller, W. 2005. Setting goals and measuring success:linking patterns and processes in stream restoration. Hydrobiologia, 552: 147–158.

Stewart, T. J. and Sprules, W. G. 2011. Carbon-based balanced trophic structure and flows in the offshore Lake Ontario foodweb before (1987–1991) and after (2001–2005) invasion-induced ecosystem change. Ecol. Model., 222: 692–708.

Vander Zanden, M. J., Chandra, S., Allen, B. C., Reuter, J. E. and Goldman, C. R. 2003. Historical foodweb structure and restoration of native aquatic communities in the Lake Tahoe (California-Nevada) basin. Ecosystems, 6: 274–288.

Vasconcellos, M., Mackinson, S., Sloman, K. and Pauly, D. 1997. The stability of trophic mass-balance models of marine ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Ecol. Model., 100: 125–134.

Published

2012-12-01