Communicating research findings and monitoring data in support of management: A case study of the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan
Keywords:
ecosystem management, adaptive management, environmental monitoringAbstract
The Bay of Quinte is a nearly enclosed bay in Lake Ontario which has been impacted by multiple industrial contaminant events and persistent eutrophication. As a result, it became one of 43 Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOC) identified and supported by the International Joint Commission (IJC) for remediation. The Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan (RAP) relies on data from Project Quinte, a long-term monitoring program, to set targets, assess the status of beneficial use impairments and evaluate restoration progress. The ability of organizations to communicate relevant and timely scientific research and monitoring to decision-makers has recently emerged as an important issue in the literature. This article explores the issue of communicating research and monitoring information for the purpose of aiding decision-making through a case study of the Bay of Quinte RAP. Research included semi-structured interviews with scientists, regulators and community stakeholders involved with the Bay of Quinte RAP, observational research, document analysis and literature review. Findings indicate that multiple and diverse techniques are used to communicate research and monitoring data to decision-makers. Furthermore, our findings indicate that accurate tracking of trends, valuing high quality monitoring, promoting stakeholder cooperation, collaborating with other groups implementing RAPs and informing management and decision-making are key beneficial outcomes of shared science about the Bay of Quinte. Lessons learned emphasize the importance of administrative support and institutional memory; integration of ecosystem models; consistent long-term monitoring; and public engagement. These lessons are instructive for stakeholders conducting ecosystem restoration, planning or management, particularly those involved in any of the other RAPs ongoing on the Great Lakes.
References
Bay of Quinte RAP Coordinating Committee (BQRAP CC). 1990. “Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Stage 1: Environmental Settings and Problem Definition”. Trenton, Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council.
Bay of Quinte RAP Coordinating Committee (BQRAP CC). 1993. “Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Stage 2: Time to Act”. Trenton, Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council.
Bay of Quinte RAP Implementation Coordination Office (BQRAP ICO). 2009a. “Bay of Quinte Research and Monitoring Forum Program”. Trenton, Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council.
Bay of Quinte RAP Implementation Coordination Office (BQRAP ICO). 2009b. “The Big Clean Up: The Bay of Quinte Annual Progress Report 2008”. Trenton, Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council.
Bay of Quinte RAP Implementation Coordination Office (BQRAP ICO). 2009c. “The Big Clean Up: The Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Newsletter Spring 2009”. Trenton, Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council.
Beak Consultants. 1988. “An evaluation of persistent contaminants in the Bay of Quinte ecosystem, Technical Report 1, Report prepared for the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee”. Ontario: Bay of Quinte Restoration Council Trenton.
Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th Ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bertram, P. E. and Reynoldson, T. B. 1992. Developing ecosystem objectives for the Great Lakes: policy, progress and public participation. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health, 1: 89–95.
Bulkley, J. W., Donahue, M. J. and Regier, H. A. 1989. “The great lakes water quality agreements: how to assess progress toward A goal of ecosystem integrity”. Edited by: Gunnerson, C. G. 27–42. New York: The American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE Technical Council on Research Environmental Impact Analysis Research Council (Eds.), Post-audits of Environmental Programs and Projects: Proceedings of a Session Sponsored by the Environmental Impact Analysis Research Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers in Conjunction with the ASCE Convention in New Orleans, Louisiana, 1989 October 11
Conrad, C. C. and Hilchey, K. G. 2010. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ. Monit. Assess., 176: 273–291.
Crowder, A. and Painter, D. S. 1991. Submerged macrophytes in Lake-Ontario—current knowledge, importance, threats to stability and needed studies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48: 1539–1545.
Diamond, M. L., Mackay, D. and Shiu, W. Y. 1992. Modelling the fate of toxic substances in the Bay of Quinte. Technical Report No. 15 prepared for the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee, Trenton, Ontario
Diamond, M. L., Mackay, D., Poulton, D. J. and Stride, F. A. 1996. Assessing chemical behaviour and developing remedial actions using a mass balance model of chemical fate in the Bay of Quinte. Wat. Res., 30: 405–421.
Eflin, J. 2004. “International cooperation in environmental politics: ecosystem management of the great lakes and the Baltic Sea”. In Science and Politics in the International Environment, Edited by: Harrison, N. E. and Bryner, G. C. 297Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Environment Canada. 2011. Bay of Qunite Area of Concern: RAP Accomplishments. Accessed online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/raps-pas/default.asp?lang=En&n=73F09CED-1&offset=4&toc=show, Accessed on: July 1, 2011
Gurtner-Zimmermann, A. 1995. A mid-term review of remedial action plans: difficulties with translating comprehensive planning into comprehensive action. J. Great Lakes Res., 21: 234–247.
Hall, J. D., O’Connor, K. and Ranieri, J. 2006. Progress toward delisting a great lakes area of concern: the role of integrated research and monitoring in the Hamilton harbour remedial action plan. Environ. Monit. Assess., 113: 227–243.
Hartig, J. H. and Zarull, M. A. 1992. Under RAPs: Toward grassroots ecological democracy in the great lakes basin, Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
Ibbotson, I. 2010. “Making the case for Sustainability”. Picton Gazette newspaper article, 180(12): 31 Accessed online http://hdl.handle.net/1974/6359, Accessed on: April 14, 2011
International Joint Commission (IJC). 1970. “Pollution of Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the international section of the St. Lawrence River”. Ottawa: International Joint Commission.
International Joint Commission (IJC). 1998. “Beacons of light: successful strategies toward restoration in areas of concern under the great lakes water quality agreement: Special report submitted to the governments of United States and Canada”. Ottawa: International Joint Commission.
International Joint Commission, United States and Canada (GLWQA). 1987. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978 Agreement, with Annexes and Terms of Reference, between the United States and Canada signed at Ottawa November 22. 1978 and Phosphorus Load Reduction Supplement signed October 16, 1983 as amended by Protocol signed November 18, 1987
Johnson, M. G. and Hurley, D. A. 1986. “Overview of Project Quinte – 1972 – 1982”. In Project Quinte: Point-Source Phosphorus Control and Ecosystem Response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Edited by: Minns, C. K., Hurley, D. A. and Nicholls, K. H. Vol. 86, 1–6. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci..
Koops, M., Irwin, B. J., MacNeil, J. E., Millard, S. E. and Mills, E. L. 2006. “Comparative modelling of the ecosystem impacts of exotic invertebrates and productivity changes on fisheries in the Bay of Quinte and Oneida Lake”. Ann Arbor, MI: Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2006 Project Completion Report.
Krantzberg, G. 2003. Keeping remedial action plans on target: lessons learned from Collingwood harbour. J. Great Lakes Res., 29: 641–651.
Krantzberg, G. 2006. Sustaining the gains made in ecological restoration: case study Collingwood harbour, Ontario. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 8: 413–424.
Manning, P. G. 1996. Bioavailability of riverine, sewage plant, and sediment phosphorus in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. Mineralogist, 34: 667–675.
Millard, S. E. and Sager, P. E. 1994. Comparison of phosphorus, light climate and photosynthesis between two culturally eutrophied bays: Green Bay, Lake Michigan and the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51: 2579–2590.
Millard, S. E. and Johannsson, O. E. 1998. “Lake Erie Lakewide Management Plan Technical Report 13: Degradation of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Populations”. Burlington: Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Ministry of the Environment, Ontario (MOE). 2009. Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish 2009–2010 (25th Ed.), Toronto: Queen's Printer.
Minns, C. K. 1986. “A simple whole-lake phosphorus model and a trial application to the Bay of Quinte”. Edited by: Minns, C. K., Hurley, D. A. and Nicholls, K. H. 84–90. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci.. Project Quinte: Point-Source Phosphorus Control and Ecosystem Response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario
Minns, C. K. 1992. Use of models for integrated assessment of ecosystem health. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health, 1: 109–118.
Minns, C. K. and Moore, J. E. 2004. “Modelling Phosphorus Management in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario in the Past, 1972 to 2001, and in the Future”. Burlington, ON: Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 2695.
Minns, C. K., Hurley, D. A. and Nicholls, K. H. 1986. “Project Quinte: Point-Source Phosphorus Control and Ecosystem Response in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario”. Ottawa, ON: Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci..
Minns, C. K., Bernard, A., Bakelaar, C. N. and Ewachuk, M. 2006. “A fish habitat classification model for the upper and middle sections of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario”. Burlington, ON: Can. Man. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2748.
Munawar, M. 2011. Ecosystem Health and Recovery of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Special Issue. Aquat. Ecosys. Health Mgmt., 14(1): 1–113.
Nicholls, K. H. 1999. Effects of temperature and other factors on summer phosphorus in the inner Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario: implications for climate warming. J. Great Lakes Res., 25: 250–262.
Nicholls, K. H., Heintsch, L. and Carney, E. 2002. Univariate step-trend and multivariate assessments of the apparent effects of P loading reductions and zebra mussels on the phytoplankton of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res., 28: 15–31.
Nicholls, K. H., Heintsch, L. and Carney, E. 2004. A multivariate approach for evaluating progress towards phytoplankton community restoration targets: examples from eutrophication and acidification case histories. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt., 7(1): 15–30.
Owens, S. 2005. Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Trans. Instit. Brit. Geog., 30: 287–292.
Project Quinte: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada, The Ontario Ministry of the Environment and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (Project Quinte). 2008. “Monitoring Report #17”. Kingston, ON: Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan.
Sproule-Jones, M. 2002. Restoration of the great lakes, Vancouver: UBC Press.
Statistics Canada (Stats. Can.). 2006. Population and Dwelling Count Highlight Tables, 2006 Census. Accessed online: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/hlt/97–550/Index.cfm?Page=INDX&LANG=Eng. Accessed on: November 12, 2010
Tonn, B., English, M. and Travis, C. 2000. A framework for understanding and improving environmental decision making. Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2): 163–183.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Lake Wide Management |Plans. Accessed online: http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/lamp/, Accessed on: July 1, 2011
Vaughan, H., Whitelaw, G., Craig, B. and Stewart, C. 2003. Linking ecological science to decision-making: delivering environmental monitoring information as societal feedback. Environ. Monit. Assess., 88: 399–408.
Vaughan, H., Waide, R. B., Maass, J. M. and Ezcurra, E. 2007. Developing and delivering scientific information in response to emerging needs. Front Ecol Environ, 5: W8–W11.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
