Use of macrophytes in the bioassessment of the health of King’wal Wetland, Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya
Keywords:
water quality, plant metrics, Index of Biotic Integrity, wetland healthAbstract
King’wal wetland, at the upper catchment of Lake Victoria, is undergoing anthropogenic disturbances which degrade its health. In this study, the wetland's health was assessed using water quality parameters and wetland macrophytes, sampled monthly at five stations from November 2010 to February 2011, and the health was evaluated using the Plant Index of Biotic Integrity. Mean dissolved oxygen and biological oxygen demand were significantly different among the stations (F = 10.67, p = 0.000 and F = 10.12, p = 0.000, respectively). Correlation matrix in principle component analysis for stations and the two mean measurements were negative in stations 3, 4 and 5 with component 1 at 62.3% variance and component 2 at 33.9% variance, and positive for mean TN and TP in the same stations indicating a nutrient rich environment. Anthropogenic activities including agriculture, livestock grazing, human settlement and urbanization were the main threats to the health of King’wal wetland. The index scores at the three transect delineated areas with minimum disturbance (ST 3) and those that were highly disturbed (ST 5). However, the entire wetland can be classified as being moderate in health. Wise use and regular monitoring of the wetland is recommended to ensure maintenance of its health.
References
Acreman, M.C., and Fergusone, A.J., 2010. Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology 55, 32–48.
Akasaka, N., Takamura, N., Mitsuhashi, H., and Kadono, Y., 2010. Effects of land use on aquatic macrophyte diversity and water quality of ponds Freshwater Biology 55, 909–922.
Ana, R.S., Taís, L., Leonardo, M., and Demétrio, G., 2008. Influence of area, habitat and water chemistry on richness and compositionof macrophyte assemblages in southern Brazilian wetlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 19, 221–228.
Asaeda, T., Fujino, T., and Manatunge, J., 2005. Morphological adaptations of emergent plants to water flow: a case study with Typha angustifolia, Zizania latifolia and Phragmites australis. Freshwater Biology 50, 1991–2001.
Bornette, G., Tabacchi, E., Hupp C., Puijalon, S., and Rostan, J., 2008. A model of plant strategies in fluvial hydrosystems. Freshwater Biology 53, 1692–1705.
Celine, B., and Paul, K., 1993. A functional classification of wetland plants. Journal of vegetation science 4, 591–600.
Cleserl, L.S., Greenberg, A.E., and Eaton, A.D. (Eds.), 1998. Standard Methods for Examination of Water & Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington. D.C.
Croft, M.V., and Chow-Fraser, P., 2007. Use and Development of the Wetland Macrophyte Index to Detect Water Quality Impairment in Fish Habitat of Great Lakes Coastal Marshes. J. Great Lakes Res. 33 (3), 172–197.
Goodwin, K., Caraco, N., and Cole, J., 2008. Temporal dynamics of dissolved oxygen in a floating leaved macrophyte bed. Freshwater Biology 53, 1632–1641.
Hering, D., Johnson, R.K., Kramm, S., Schmutz, S., Szoszkiewicz, K., and Verdonchot, P.M., 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macro-invertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organisms response to stress. Freshwater Biology 51, 1757–1785.
Hillermannova, M., Kopp, R., Sukop, I., and Vitek, T., 2008. Accumulation of trace metals by aquatic macrophytes and their possible use in phytoremeditiation. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun. 1, 97–104.
Hrivnak, R., 2005. Effect of ecological factors on the zonation of wetland vegetation. Acta Sosietatis Botanicorum Coloniae 74 (1), 73–81.
Hrivnak, R., Otahelova, H., and Valachovic, M., 2007. The relationship between macrophyte vegetation and habitat factors along a middle-sized European river. Polish Journal of Ecology 55, 717–729. http://www.fountainsafaris.com/data/ attractions/specific/Kingwal_Swamp.vrt
Janauer, G.A., 2001. Is what has been measured of any direct relevance to the success of macrophyte in the particular environment? Scientific and legal aspects of biological monitoring in fresh water. Journal of Limnology 60 (Suppl. 1): . 33:38.
Jeffries, M., and Mills, D., 1990. Freshwater ecology; Principles and applications. Castlefield Press Ltd., Wellingborough, Northants.
Khana, D.R., and Bhutiani, R., 2008. Laboratory manual of water and waste water analysis. Daya Publishing House, Delhi.
Kopec, D., Dolcouski, R., and Urbaniak, P., 2010. Using macrophytes as trophic state indicators in upland river waters: a case study of the Czarna Maleniecka River. International Journal of Oceanography and Hydrobiology 34(1), 119–126.
Lee, P., and McNaughton, K., 2004. Macrophytes induced microchemical changes in the water column in the Northern Boreal Lake. Hydrobiologia 522, 207–220.
Liepold, P., and Karius, M., 2007. Index of Biological Integrity. Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP). . <http://www.mnwhep.org/id46.html>. Accessed 21 March 2014.
Lukasc, B., Devai, G., and Tothmerez, B., 2009. Aquatic macrophytes as bioindicators in nutrient reach backwaters along the Upper-Tisza River (in Hungary). Phytocoenologia 39 (3), 287–293.
Mitsch, W.J., and Gosselink, J.G., . (Eds.), 2000. Wetlands. John Wiley and Sons Ink., New York, NY, USA.
Orfanidis, S., Papathanasiou, V., Sabetta, L., Pinna, M., Gigil, V., Gounaris, S., Tsiagga, E., Nakou, K., and Theodosiou, T., 2007. Benthic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of transitional and coastal waters: relevant approaches and tools. Transitional Water Bulleting 3, 45–49.
Penning, E., Dudley, B., Mjelde, M., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., van den Berg, M., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N., and Ecke, F., 2008. Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes. Aquat Ecol. 42, 253–264.
Rader, R.B., Batzer, D.P., and Wissinger, S.A., 2001. Bioassessment and management of North American freshwater wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Hofmann, G., Stelzer D., Schneider, S., and Schmedtje, U., 2004. Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes – a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34, 302–314.
Sitienei, A.J., Jiwen, G., and Jean de la paix, M., 2012. Impacts of Anthropogenic Activities and Climate on Wetland Ecology: Case of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) at Kingwal Wetland, Kenya. East African Journal of Science and Technology 1(1), 1–8.
Søndergaard, M., Johansson, S., Lauridsen, L., Jørgensen, B., Liboriussen, L., and Jeppesen, E., 2010. Submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes. Freshwater Biology 55, 893–908.
Squires, M., Lesack, L., and Huebert, D., 2002. The influence of water transparency on the distribution and abundance of macrophytes among lakes of the Mackenzie Delta, Western Canadian Arctic. Freshwater Biology 47, 2123–2135.
Tiner, R.W., 1991. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. BioScience 41 (4), 236–247.
Weisner, S.B., and Thiere, G., 2010. Effects of vegetation state on biodiversity and nitrogen retention in created wetlands: a test of the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning hypothesis. Freshwater Biology 55, 387–396.
Willby, N.J., Abernethy, V.J., and Demarst, B.L., 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwater Biology 43, 43–74.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
