Elucidation of ecosystem attributes of two Mackenzie great lakes with trophic network analysis
Keywords:
Great Bear Lake, Great Slave Lake, Ecopath, fisheries, ecosystem propertiesAbstract
The Mackenzie Basin in northwestern Canada is a high-latitude region, with one of the largest watersheds in the world. The Mackenzie great lakes, consisting of Great Bear Lake, Great Slave Lake and Lake Athabasca form the large lake complex. The human presence in the area is small in terms of population and industry and thus these ecosystems remain comparatively pristine and show no major changes in the fish communities. Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), the most important and most used ecosystem trophic network modelling tool to study the ecosystem-level responses to changes, and information available in the scientific literature together with traditional knowledge about Great Slave Lake and Great Bear Lake was used to elucidate the ecosystem attributes. Our models give a cohesive view of these two ecosystems that will allow researchers and decision makers to explore questions regarding the stability of fisheries and future ecological change. The moderate trophic level of fish catch along with the small percentage of primary production required to sustain fisheries in both lakes demonstrated that fisheries were sustainable during the time period modelled. The ecosystem indices and attributes of the comparatively pristine Mackenzie great lakes were compared with those of two Laurentian Great Lakes having similar types of Ecopath ecosystem models. The metrics utilized to assess comparatively the ecosystem's maturity, stability and health indicated a decline in ecosystem maturity and stability from pristine Great Bear Lake to transitioning Lake Ontario.
References
Bailey, R.M., Smith, G.R., 1981. Origin and geography of the fish fauna of the Laurentian Great Lakes basin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38, 1539–1561.
Brey, T., 1999. A collection of empirical relations for use in ecological modelling. NAGA, 22, 24–28.
Christensen, V., 1995. Ecosystem maturity-towards quantification. Ecol. Model. 77, 3–32.
Christensen, V., Pauly, D., 1993. Flow characteristics of aquatic ecosystems. In: V. Christensen, D. Pauly (Eds.)Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. pp. 338–352. World Fish Centre. Phillipines.
Christensen, V., Pauly, D., 1998. Changes in models of aquatic ecosystems approaching carrying capacity. Ecol. Appl. 8, 104–109.
Christensen, V., Walters, C.J., 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim, methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model. 172, 109–139.
Christensen, V., Walters, C.J., Pauly, D. (Eds.), 2005. Ecopath with Ecosim, A user's guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Christensen, V., Walters, C.J., Pauly, D., Forrest, R. (Eds.), 2008. Ecopath with Ecosim version 6 User Guide. Lenfest Ocean Futures Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Dame, J.K., Christian, R.R., 2006. Uncertainty and the Use of Network Analysis for Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management. Fisheries, 31, 331–341.
Dobiesz, N.E., Hecky, R.E., Johnson, T.B., Sarvala, J., Dettmers, J.M., Lehtiniemi, M., Witte, F., 2010. Metrics of ecosystem status for large aquatic systems–A global comparison. J. Great Lakes Res. 36, 123–138.
Downing, J.A., Plante, C., Lalonde, S., 1990. Fish production correlated with primary productivity, not the morphoedaphic index. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 1929–1936.
Evans, M.S., 2000. The large lake ecosystems of northern Canada. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health, 3, 65–79.
Fee, E., Stahwon, M.P., Kling, H.J., 1985. Primary production and related limnological data for some lakes of the Yellowknife, NWT area. Canada Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 1409. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Finn, J.T., 1976. Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis of flows. J. Theor. Biol. 56, 363–380.
Froese, R., Binohlan, C. 2000. Empirical relationships to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity, and length at maximum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length frequency data. J. Fish Biol. 56, 758–773.
Froese, R., Pauly, D. (Eds.), 2011. Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org
Great Bear Lake Working Group (GBLWG), 2005. “The Water Heart”, A Management Plan for Great Bear Lake and its Watershed. Directed by the Great Bear Lake Working Group (May 31, 2005, with Caveat of February 7, 2006), Great Bear Lake Working Group, Deline, NWT, Canada.
Halfon, E., Schito, N., 1993. Lake Ontario food web, an energetic mass balance. In: Christensen, V., Pauly, D. (Eds.) Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems, pp. 29–39. . ICALRM Conference Proceedings Vol. 26., World Fish Centre Manila, Philippines.
Hecky, R. E., 2013. Ecosystem Health of Large Lakes, Identifying Utility and Metrics. . http,//www.glfc.org/research/Hecky_Health_of_large_systems.pdf
Herdendorf, C.E., 1982. Large lakes of the world. Journal of Great Lakes Research 8, 379–412.
Johnson, L., 1975a. Physical and chemical characteristics of Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32, 971–1987.
Johnson, L., 1975b. Distribution of fish species in Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, with reference to zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, and environmental conditions. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32, 1989–2004.
Jorgensen, S.E. (Ed.), 1979. Handbook of Environmental Data and Ecological Parameters. International Society of Ecological Modelling, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Keleher, J.J., 1972. Great Slave Lake, effects of exploitation on the salmonid community. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29, 741–753.
Kitchell, J.F., Cox, S.P., Harvey, C.J., Johnson, T.B., Mason, D.M, Schoen, K.K., Aydin, K., Bronte, C., Ebener, M., Hansen, M., 2000. Sustainability of the Lake Superior fish community, interactions in a food web context. Ecosystems, 3, 545–560.
Koops, M.A., Dermott, R.M., Leisti, K.E., Johannsson, O.E., Millard, E.S., Minns, C.K., Munawar, M., Nicholls, K.H., Hoyle, J.A., 2009. The Bay of Quinte, a model for large lake ecosystem management. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 30, 1024–1029.
Langseth, B.J., Rogers, M., and Zhang, H., 2012. Modeling species invasions in Ecopath with Ecosim, An evaluation using Laurentian Great Lakes models. Ecol. Model. 247, 251–261.
Libralato, S., Coll, M., Tudela, S., Palomera, I., Pranovi, F., 2008. Novel index for quantification of ecosystem effects of fishing as removal of secondary production. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser-. 355, 107.
Moore, J.W. 1980. Attached and planktonic algal communities in some inshore areas of Great Bear Lake. Can. J. Bot. 58: 2294–2308.
Morissette, L., 2005. Addressing Uncertainty in Marine Ecosystems Modelling. NATO Sci. S. Sc. IV Ear., 50, 127–142.
Muir, A.M., Leonard, D.M., Krueger, C.C., 2012. Past, present and future of fishery management on one of the world's last remaining pristine great lakes, Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 1–23.
Odum, E.P., 1969. The Strategy of Ecosystem Development. Science, 164, 262–270.
Palomares, M.L. D., Pauly, D., 1998. Predicting food consumption of fish populations as functions of mortality, food type, morphometrics, temperature and salinity. Mar. Freshwater Res. 49, 447–453.
Pauly, D., 1980. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 39, 175–192.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature, 374, 255–257.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., and Walters, C. 2000. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES J. of Mar. Sci. 57, 697–706.
Pérez-España, H., Arreguín-Sánchez, F., 2001. An inverse relationship between stability and maturity in models of aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 145, 189–196.
Raffaelli, D.G., Frid, C. (Eds.), 2010. Ecosystem ecology, a new synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rawson, D.S., 1950. The physical limnology of Great Slave Lake. J. Fish. Board Can. 8, 3–66.
Rutledge, R.W., Bacore, B.L., Mulholland, R.J., 1976. Ecological stability, an information theory viewpoint. J. Theor. Biol, 57, 355–37l.
Schindler, D.W., 1972. Production of phyto-plankton and zooplankton in Canadian shield lakes. In: Z. Kajak, and A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska (Eds.), Productivity Problems of Freshwater. pp. 311–331. PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers, Poland.
Smol, J.P., 1992. Paleolimnology, an important tool for effective management. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health, 1, 49–59.
Tudela S., Coll, M., Palomera, I., 2005. Developing an operational reference framework for fisheries management on the basis of a two-dimensional index of ecosystem impact. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 62, 585–591.
Ulanowicz, R.E. (Ed.) 1986. Growth and Development, Ecosystems Phenomenology. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Vasconcellos, M., Mackinson, S., Sloman, K., Pauly, D., 1997. The stability of trophic mass-balance models of marine ecosystems, a comparative analysis. Ecol. Model. 100, 125–134.
Waters, T.E., 1977. Secondary production in inland waters. Adv. Ecol. Res. 10, 91–164.
Westra, L. (Eds.) 1994. An Environmental Proposal for Ethics, The Principle of Integrity. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, USA.
Xu, F.L., Tao, S., Dawson, R.W., Li, P.G., Cao, J., 2001. Lake ecosystem health assessment, indicators and methods. Water Res. 35, 3157–3167.
Xu, F.L., Zhao, Z.Y., Zhan, W., Zhao, S.S., Dawson, R.W., Tao, S., 2005. An ecosystem health index methodology (EHIM) for lake ecosystem health assessment. Ecol. Model., 188, 327–339.
Zhu, X., Johnson, T.B., 2006. Constructing a mass-balanced model to explore trophic dynamics in Lake Erie. Proceedings from the 2006 Annual Conference on Great Lakes Research, The Changing Environment of the Great Lakes. Windsor, Ontario.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
