Prioritization of sites for sediment remedial action at Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour

Authors

  • D. Milani Environment and Climate Change Canada, Water Science and Technology Directorate, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canada
  • L. C. Grapentine Environment and Climate Change Canada, Water Science and Technology Directorate, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canada

Keywords:

remediation, toxicity, benthic invertebrates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals

Abstract

Hamilton Harbour, an enclosed embayment at the western end of Lake Ontario, was designated as an Area of Concern in 1985 under the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative. The harbour has been disturbed by wastes from steel industries, municipal wastewater discharges, and urban runoff. The area of the harbour known as Randle Reef has the largest volume of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated sediment on the Great Lakes and will be undergoing a major remediation project. An engineered containment facility will be constructed on top of the most contaminated sediment and surrounding sediments will be dredged and placed inside the engineered containment facility, or capped. To determine where remediation was required, areas were prioritized according to toxicity and contaminant concentrations. Although benthic invertebrate community assessment can be the best indicator of in situ toxicity, this was problematic in the harbour due to lack of appropriate reference areas for comparison and potential effects of other stressors (e.g. disturbances of sediments from ship traffic, seasonal low hypolimnetic oxygen concentrations). Initial prioritization of areas for remediation was therefore based on toxicity to benthic invertebrates and the associated contaminant levels. In 2002, 80 sites were sampled and laboratory bioassays conducted with the Amphipod Hyalella azteca and the Mayfly Hexagenia spp. Initial site prioritizations were established based on: (1) high contamination and toxicity; (2) high contamination and no/low toxicity; (3) low contamination and toxicity; and (4) low contamination and no toxicity. Final prioritizations considered study design and area considerations as well as additional sediment data obtained to address data gaps. Of the 80 sites, 79% were classed in a priority subgroup, while remaining sites were deemed non-priority.

References

American Public Health Association (APHA), 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Washington, D.C.

Balch, G.C., Metcalfe, C.D., Huestis, S.Y., 1995. Identification of potential fish carcinogens in sediment from Hamilton Harbour, Ontario, Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14, 79–91.

BBL (Blasland, Bouck and Lee Inc.), Hart Crowser Inc., Riggs Engineering, Ocean and Coastal Consultants Inc., 2006. Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Basis of Design Report, Hamilton, Ontario. Project 34305-009, 2 February, 2006.

Bedard, D., Hayton A., Persaud D., 1992. Ontario Ministry of the Environment laboratory sediment biological testing protocol. Water Resources Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ISBN 0-7729-9924-4. http://archive.org/stream/ontarioministryo00bedauoft/ontarioministryo00bedauoft_djvu.txt

Belbin, L., 1991. Semi-strong hybrid scaling, a new ordination algorithm. J. Vegetation Sci. 2, 491–496.

Belbin, L., 1993. PATN, pattern analysis package. Division of Wildlife and Ecology, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.

Borgmann, U., Munawar, M., 1989. A new standardised sediment bioassay protocol using the amphipod Hyalella azteca (Saussure). Hydrobiol. 188/189, 425–431.

Borgmann, U., Norwood, W.P., 1993. Spatial and temporal variability in toxicity of Hamilton Harbour sediments: Evaluation of the Hyalella azteca 4-week chronic toxicity test. J. Great Lakes Res. 19, 72–82.

Burgess, R.M., McKinney, R.A., 1997. Effects of sediment homogenization on interstitial water PCB geochemistry. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 33, 125–129.

CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment), 2001a. Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Introduction. Updated. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg. Excerpt from Publication No. 1299; ISBN 1-896997-34-1.

CCME, 2001b. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME Water Quality Index 1.0, Technical Report. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg. http://www.ccme.ca/ourwork/water.html?category_id=102#290

Coakley, J.P., Poulton, D.J., Morris, W.A., 1994. Trace and selected elements in surficial sediments from Hamilton Harbour. NWRI Contribution No, 94-43. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

Dermott, R., Bonnell, R., 2010. Benthic fauna in Hamilton Harbour and adjacent Lake Ontario 2002–2005 in comparison to 1964. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 13(4), 413–428.

Dermott, R., Johannsson, O., Munawar, M., Bonnell, R., Bowen, K., Burley, M., Fitzpatrick, M., Gerlofsma, J., Niblock, H., 2007. Assessment of lower foodweb in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, 2002-2004. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2729.

Fletcher, R., Welsh, P., Fletcher, T., 2008. Guidelines for identifying, assessing and managing contaminated sediment in Ontario: An integrated approach. Ontario Ministry of the Environment. PIBS 6658e. May 2008.

Graham, M., Hartman, E., Joyner, R., Santiago, R., 2012. PAH-contaminated sediment remediation: An overview of a proposed large scale clean-up in a freshwater harbour. Contaminated sediments: Restoration of Aquatic Environment. STP 1554. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. DOI:10.1520/STP104354.

Graham, M., Hartman, E., He, C., Droppo, I.G., 2013a. Examining thin layer cap behaviour in freshwater industrial harbour. J Soils Sediments (2013) 13, 1515–1526.

Graham, M., Vieira, C., Hartman, E., Santiago, R., 2013b. A Summary of the Site Specific Cleanup Criterion Developed for the Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada, Great Lakes Areas of Concern Section, Sediment Remediation Unit and Ontario Ministry of the Environment, West Central Region.

Grapentine, L., Marvin, C., Painter, S., 2002. Initial development and evaluation of a sediment quality index for the Great Lakes region. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8(7), 1549–1567.

Hamilton Harbour RAP (HH RAP), 1992. Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour. Goals, Options and Recommendations. RAP Stage 2, Volume 2 – Main Report. ISBN 0-7778-0533-2.

Hamilton Harbour RAP (HH RAP) Stakeholder Forum, 2003. Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Stage 2 Update 2002. Burlington, Ontario, Canada. ISBN 0-9733779-0-9.

Krantzberg, G., 1994. Spatial and temporal variability in metal bioavailability and toxicity of sediment from Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13, 1685–1698.

Krantzberg, G., Boyd, D., 1992. The biological significance of contaminants in sediment from Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 1527–1540.

Logan, D.T., 2007. Perspective on Ecotoxicology of PAHs to Fish. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 13, 302–316.

Luoma, S.N., Carter, J.L., 1991. Effects of trace metals on aquatic benthos. In: M.C. Newman, A.W. McIntosh (Eds.), Metal ecotoxicology: concepts and applications, pp. 261–300. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan.

Marvin, C.H., Grapentine, L.C., Painter, S., 2004. Application of a sediment quality index to the lower Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ. Monit. Assess 91, 1–16.

Metcalfe, C. D., Cairns, V.W., Fitzsimons, J.D., 1988. Experimental induction of liver tumours in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) by contaminated sediment from Hamilton Harbour, Ontario. Can.). Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 2161–2167.

Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., 2006a. Identification of toxic sites in Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario. NWRI Contribution No. 06-408.

Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., 2006b. Application of BEAST sediment quality guidelines to Hamilton Harbour, an area of concern. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario. NWRI Contribution No. 06-407.

Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., Fletcher, R., 2013. Sediment contamination in Lyons Creek East, a tributary of the Niagara River: Part I. Assessment of benthic macroinvertebrates. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 64 (1), 65–86.

Mount, D., Heinis, L., Highland, T., Hockett, J.R., Jenson, C., Norberg-King, T.J., 2009. Are PAHs the right metric for assessing toxicity related to oils, tars, creosote and similar contaminants in sediments? Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, Louisiana.

Murphy, T.P., Brouwer, H., Fox, M.E., Nagy, E., McArdle, L., Moller, A., 1990. Coal tar contamination near Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. NWRI Contribution No. 90–17.

Reynoldson, T.B., Day, K.E., 1998. Biological guidelines for the assessment of sediment quality in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario. NWRI Contribution No. 98-232.

Reynoldson, T. B., Bailey, R.C., Day, K.E., Norris, R.H., 1995. Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on benthic assessment of sediment (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state. Aust. J. Ecol. 20, 198–219.

Reynoldson, T.B., Day, K.E., Clarke, C., Milani, D., 1994. Effect of indigenous animals on chronic end points in freshwater sediment toxicity tests. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13, 973–977.

Reynoldson, T.B., Thompson, S.P., Milani, D., 2002. Integrating multiple toxicological endpoints in a decision-making framework for contaminated sediments. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 8, 1569–1584.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1983. Methods for the chemical analysis of water and wastes (MCAWW) EPA/600/4-79/020.

USEPA, 2007. Sediment Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) Phases I, II and III. Guidance Document EPA/600/R-07/080. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/publications/files/Sediment TIE Guidance Document.pdf

USEPA, 2013. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods SW-846, USEPA Office of Solid Waste, 3rd Edition. Available at http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/online/

Zeman, A.J., Patterson, T.S., 2003. Sediment sampling at Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. NWRI contribution No. 03-172.

Zeman, A.J., Patterson, T.S., 2006. Characterization of contaminated sediments for remediation projects in Hamilton Harbour. In: E.J. Calabrese, P.T. Kostecki, J. Dragun (Eds.), Contaminated Soils, Sediments and Water. Volume 10: Successes and Challenges, pp. 401–421. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, NY.

Published

2016-04-02