Performance testing of ballast water management systems: Revisiting the interpretation of organisms ≥10 μm and ≤50 μm in minimum dimension

Authors

  • Young-Hee Kim Department of Oceanography and Ocean Environmental Sciences, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak–ro, Yusung–gu, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea
  • Pung-Guk Jang Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, 656-830, Republic of Korea
  • Seung Won Jung Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, 656-830, Republic of Korea
  • Keun-Hyung Choi Department of Oceanography and Ocean Environmental Sciences, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak–ro, Yusung–gu, Daejeon 305–764, Republic of Korea

Keywords:

phytoplankton, invasive species, ballast water convention

Abstract

Phytoplankton are a major concern in the introduction of marine invasive species by ships. The current ballast water performance standard (Regulation D2) under the Ballast Water Convention prescribes the number of viable organisms allowed in discharged ballast water. For organisms ≥10 μm and ≤50 μm in minimum dimension, the D2 allows <10 viable organisms per ml, a size category including mostly phytoplankton. However, many phytoplankton are narrower than 10 μm but much longer than 10 μm. This discrepancy causes two major problems: firstly, ballast water management systems will not be examined for their performance at removing organisms larger than regulated by D2. Secondly, this will require higher concentrations of plankton in the challenge water to meet the required test water condition of >103 ml−1 for organisms of sizes as stipulated in the guidelines. Examination of the seasonal distribution of local Korean fresh and sea water shows that phytoplankton communities are frequently dominated by cells <10 μm in width but >10 μm in length. In addition, review of over 600 freshwater diatoms of elongated shapes reveals that more than 300 are >10 μm long, but <10 μm wide. We suggest consideration of these phytoplankton in land-based or shipboard treatment procedures and to report their treatment efficacy, in addition to reporting the performance of ballast water management systems in accordance with the D2 regulation.

References

Baek, S.H., Jung, S.W., Jang, M.C., Hyun, B., Shin, K., 2011. Survival potential of autotrophic phytoplankton species collected from ballast water in international commercial ships. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 46, 125–136.

Carlton, J.T., Geller, J.B., 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261, 78–82.

Doblin, M.A., Dobbs, F.C., 2006. Setting a size-exclusion limit to remove toxic dinoflagellate cysts from ships' ballast water. Marine pollution bulletin 52, 259–263.

Endresen, Ø., Lee Behrens, H., Brynestad, S., Bjørn Andersen, A., Skjong, R., 2004. Challenges in global ballast water management. Marine Pollution Bulletin 48, 615–623.

International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2008. Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8), Resolution MEPC, 174(58), IMO, London

Lasternas, P., 2012. Implications of phytoplankton cell death losses forcarbon flux in Oceanic food-webs. Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Liebich, V., Stehouwer, P.P., Veldhuis, M., 2012. Re-growth of potential invasive phytoplankton following UV-based ballast water treatment. Aquatic Invasions 7, 29–36.

McCarthy, H., Crowder, L., 2000. An overlooked scale of global transport: Phytoplankton species richness in ships' ballast water. Biological Invasions 2, 321–322.

NSF International, 2010. Generic protocol for the verification of ballast water treatment technology, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. EPA/600/R-10/146

Ruiz, G., Carlton, J., Grosholz, E., Hines, A., 1997. Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: Mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37, 621–632.

Published

2016-10-01

Issue

Section

Research article