Socioeconomic status of riverine fisher communities in India

Authors

  • Pradeep K. Katiha Plan Implementation and Monitoring Section, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 001, India
  • Arun Pandit Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
  • Anjana Ekka Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India
  • A. P. Sharma Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata 700 120, India

Keywords:

Riparian fisher community, literacy, health, income

Abstract

The inland traditional fishers, such as those from riverine, estuarine, reservoirs, and wetlands of India, are primarily dependent on natural waters for their livelihoods. Governments at various levels have made several efforts, including decentralization of management rights, promotion of cooperatives and formation of self-help groups, to develop the fisheries. Despite these efforts, production from most of the culture-based inland fishery waters (particularly adopting fish stock enhancements) is below potential, as a vast gap is observed between the potential and existing fish production. There is immense potential for increasing the fishing effort, production and income. Capture fishery resources, particularly in the riverine fisheries, are declining due to resource degradation and excessive exploitation. The impact of fisheries developmental programmes instituted by government agencies like the National Fisheries Development Board are hardly recognised on fisheries communities due to the multiple-use common pool resource nature of the fishing resource. Comprehensive investigations on the socioeconomic status of riverine fisher communities are rare. The present investigation studies the socioeconomic conditions of riverine fisher communities in different regions of India. The study covered six states of five regions in India: Uttar Pradesh in the North; Tamil Nadu and Kerala in the South; Orissa and West Bengal in the East; Gujarat in the West; Assam in the northeastern region. The overall socioeconomic index results concluded that almost all the regions have achieved only 46% to 52% of the socioeconomic criteria studied. Institutional financial support for alternate income generation activities; organisation under self-help groups, and vocational training for fisherwomen to undertake alternate income-generating activities during the closed/off season are some of the suggestions resulting from the investigation.

References

Akinola, C.A., Patel, A.U., 1987. Construction and Standardization of a Scale of Measure Socio-economic Status, of Heads of Rural Households (Gandu) in the Funtua Zone of Kaduna State. J. Rural. Dev. 10(1), 85–96.

ARC, 2012. Available at: http://arc.gov.in/9threport/ARC_9th_Report_Ch4.pdf

Béné, C., 2003. When fishery rhymes with poverty: A first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Dev. 31(6), 949–975.

Bhatia, M. S., (1999). Rural Infrastructure and Growth in Agriculture. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 34(13), A43–A48.

Census of India, 2011. http://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/MMR_release_070711.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 1997. Number of Fishers. Fisheries Circular No 929. FAO, Rome.

Katiha. P. K., 2010. Socio-economic aspects in Inland fisheries. In: P.K. Katiha, K.K. Vass, A.P. Sharma, U. Bhaumik and G. Chandra (Eds.), Issues and tools for social sciences research in inland fisheries. Bulletin 163, 46–59. Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore.

Katiha, P. K., Sarkar, S., 2010. Sustainability in Indian fisheries. In Sen, R. K. 2010. Environment and sustainable economic development. Deep and Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 243–264.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), 2011. http://mohfw.nic.in/WriteReadData/l892s/972971120FW%20Statistics%202011%20Revised%2031%2010%2011pdf

NCAP, 2004. http://www.ncap.res.in/upload_files/others/oth_2.pdf

Planning Commission, 2001. Government of India, Report of the working group on agricultural development in eastern and north eastern India for the formulation of the tenth five year plan, http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp/wgagriNE.pdf

Planning Commission, 2012. Report of Working Group on Development and Management of Fisheries and Aquaculture for the XII Five-Year Plan, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.

Ruddle, K., 1994a. A Guide to the Literature on Traditional Community-based Fishery Management in the Asia–Pacific Tropicsa. Fisheries Circular No. 869, FIPP/C869. FAO, Rome.

Ruddle, K., 1994b; External forces and change in traditional community-based fishery management systems in the Asia–Pacific Region. Mar. Anthro. Stud. 6(1–2), 1–37.

Ruddle, K., 1998. Traditional community-based coastal marine fisheries management in Viet Nam. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 40(3), 1–22.

Thilsted, S. H., Roos, N., Hassan N., 1997. The role of small indigenous fish species in food and nutrition security in Bangladesh. Naga-the ICLARM Quarterly (suppl). July-December, 13–15.

Times of India, 2012. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-15/hyderabad/31344811_1_minorities-reservation-schemes

Worldfish Center, 2005. Fisheries and the Millennium Development Goals: Solutions for Africa. Worldfish Center, Penang, Malaysia.

Published

2017-04-03