Environmental monitoring to guide and assess the effectiveness of Randle Reef sediment remediation on the recovery of Hamilton Harbour
Keywords:
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Area of ConcernAbstract
Randle Reef is a 60 hectare portion of the Hamilton Harbour bed, heavily contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals. Remediation of contaminated sediment at Randle Reef is currently underway and is expected to be completed by 2022. In order to measure the effectiveness of the remedial effort on the surrounding ecosystem as well as enable the project's success to be critically evaluated, short and long term site-specific monitoring studies are required. As such, research scientists and sediment remediation specialists have collaborated to develop a site-specific, comprehensive series of environmental monitoring plans. The monitoring plans use several metrics to determine the state of the ecosystem prior to, during and post remediation. Monitoring studies have been designed to measure physical, biological and chemical trends over time. These studies will be used to determine the overall effectiveness of the remediation project and ultimately lead to the eventual delisting of Hamilton Harbour from the list of Great Lakes Areas of Concern. This article is a synopsis of the environmental monitoring studies that have been designed to guide and assess the effectiveness of the Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project.
References
Baumann, P.C., 2010. Data Analysis and Fish Tumour BUI Assessment for the lower Great Lakes and interconnecting waterways. Environment Canada internal Report.
Baumann, P.C., LeBlanc, D.R., Blazer, V.S., Meier, J.R., Hurley, S.T., Kiryu, Y., 2008. Prevalence of tumors in brown bullhead from three lakes in Southeastern Massachusetts, 2002. US Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5198.
Birtwell, I.K., Farrell, M., and Jonson, A., 2008. The validity of including turbidity criteria for aquatic resource protection in Land Development Guidelines. (Pacific and Yukon Region). Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2852.
Blasland, Bouck and Lee, Inc. (BBL), 2006. Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project - Basis of Design Report and Basis of Design Addendum, Burlington.
Bridges, T.S., Ells, S., Hayes, D., Mount, D., Nadeau, S.C., Palermo, M., Patmont, C., Schroeder, P., 2008. The Four Rs of Environmental Dredging: Resuspension, Release, Residual and Risk. US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC/EL TR-08-4).
Burniston, D.A., Jia, J., Charlton, M.N., Thiessen, L., McCarry, B.E., Marvin, C.H., 2016. Trends in Hamilton Harbour Suspended Sediment Quality. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 19 (2), 141–149.
Chapman, 2008. Canada-Ontario Decision Making Framework for the Assessment of Great Lakes Contaminated Sediment. ISBN 978-0-662-46147-0.
Chapman, P.M., McDonald, B.G., 2005. Using the Sediment Quality Triad (Sqt) in ecological risk assessment. Small-scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations 2, 308–329.
Charlton, M., 1983. Downflux of sediment, organic matter and phosphorus in the Niagara River area of Lake Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res 9 (2), 201–211.
Environment Canada, 2012. Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project, Comprehensive Study Report. >2012 October 30 CEAA Ref # 80001. https://www.ceaaacee.gc.ca/050/documents/p80001/84290E.pdf
Environment Canada and Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques du Québec, 2015. Guide for the Development of Environmental Monitoring and Surveillance Programs for Dredging and Sediment Management Projects.
Fox, M.E., Khan, R.M., Thiessen, P.A., 1996. Loadings of PCBs and PAHs from Hamilton Harbour to Lake Ontario. Water Quality Res J. Canada. 31(3), 593–608.
Graham, M., 2013b. Memorandum to Riggs Engineering – Summary of Environment Canada field work and data regarding clay elevations in the Randle Reef area and sediment chemistry. December 10, 2013.
Graham, M., Naziri, M., 2013c. Correlating Turbidity to Total Suspended Solids, Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project. Environment Canada Report. 2013 August 8.
Graham M., Hartman E., Joyner, R., Santiago R., 2012. PAH-contaminated sediment remediation: An overview of a proposed large scale clean-up in a freshwater harbour. Contaminated Sediments: Restoration of Aquatic Environment. STP 1554. www.astm.org
Graham, M., Hartman, E., Santiago, R., 2013a. Turbidity Monitoring During Pile Driving Testing, Randel Reef Sediment Remediation Project, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada Report, April 25, 2013.
Graham, M., Vieira, C., Hartman, E. and Santiago, R., 2013d. A Summary of the Site Specific Clean-up Criteria for the Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada Internal Report.
Graham, M., Hartman, E., Bosworth, W., Santiago, R., Kim, K., and Joyner, R., 2014. Derivation of water quality objectives during dredging operations, Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project, Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario,” Proceedings of the Western Dredging Association and Texas A&M University Center for Dredging Studies' “Dredging Summit and Expo 2014”, Toronto, Canada, 2014 June 15-18.
Harlow, H.E., Hodson, P.V., 1988. Chemical Contamination of Hamilton Harbour: A Review: Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science No. 1603.
International Joint Commission (IJC). 1987. Revised Great Lakes Water Qaulity Agreement of 1987 as amended by Protocol. November 1987.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). 2014. Contaminated Sediments Remediation, CS-2. Washington, D.C.: The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, Contaminated Sediments Team http://www.itrcweb.org/contseds_remedy-selection.
MDA Consulting Limited, 1999. Randle Reef Remediation Project Pre-Engineering Technical Evaluation- Final Report. Consultant Report Prepared for Stelco, May 1999, Burlington, Canada.
Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., 2006a. Application of BEAST sediment quality guidelines to Hamilton Harbour, An area of concern. Environment Canada NWRI Contribution No. 06-407. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., 2006b. Identification of toxic sites in Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada NWRI Contribution No. 06-408. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Milani, D., Grapentine, L.C., 2016. Prioritization of sites for sediment remedial action at Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 19(2), 150–160.
Murphy, T.P., Brouwer, H., Fox, M.E., Nagy, E., McArdle, L., Moller, A., 1990. Coal Tar Contamination Near Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour. Lakes Research Branch, National Water Research Institute. Burlington, Ontario. NWRI Contribution No. 90-17.
Murphy, T.P., Boyd, D. and Orchard, I., 1995. Contaminated Sediment in Hamilton Harbour; an Update to the Remedial Action Plan Stage 2 Report. Lakes Research Branch, National Water Research Institute. Burlington, Ontario.
National Research Council, 2007. Sediment Dredging at Superfund Megasites, Assessing the Effectivness. Committee on Sediment Dredging at Superfund Megasites, Board on Environmental Studies Toxicology, Division on Earth and Life Studies. The National Academies Press Washington, D.C., 2007.
Palermo, M., Schroeder, P.R., Estes, J.R., Francingues, N.R., 2008. Technical Guidelines for Environmental Dredging of Contaminated Sites. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Centre – ERDC/EL TR-08-29.
Parrott, J.L., Kohli, J., Sherry, J.P., Hewitt, L.M., 2011. In vivo and in vitro mixed-function oxygenase activity and vitellogenin induction in fish and in fish and rat liver cells by stilbenes isolated from scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 60(1), 116–123.
Public Words and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). 2015. Hamilton Harbour. Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project (Stage 1) Project Specifications R.050927.001. March 27, 2015.
Redish, A., (Chair - Hamilton Harbour RAP Stakeholder Forum), 2002. Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour, Stage 2 Update.
Reynoldson, T.B., Bailey R.C., Day, K.E. and Norris, R.H., 1995 Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on benthic assessment of sediment (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state. Aust. J. Ecol. 20, 198–219.
Sofowote, U.M., McCarry B.E., and Marvin M.H., 2008. Source Apportionment of PAH in Hamilton Harbour Suspended Sediments: Comparison of Two Factor Analysis Methods. Environmental Science and Technology/Vol 42
Thackston, E.L., Palermo, M.R., 2000. Improved Methods for Correlating Turbidity and Suspended Solids for Monitoring. DOET Technical Notes Collection, ERDC TN-DOER-E8. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/dots/doer/.
Watson-Leung, T., Graham, M., Hartman, E. and Welsh, P., 2017. Using a modified dredging elutriate testing approach to evaluate potential aquatic impacts associated with dredging a large freshwater industrial Harbour. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 13(1), 155–166.
Wilber, D.H. and Clark, D.G., 2001. Biological Effects of Suspended Sediments: A Reviewof Suspended Sediment Impacts on Fish and Shellfish with Relation to Dredging Activities in Estuaries, North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:855–875.
Yang, X., Meier, J., Chang, L., Rowan, M., Bauman, P.C., 2009. DNA damage and external lesions in brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) from contaminated habitats. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25(11), 3035–3038.
Zeman, A.J., 2011. Subaqueous Capping of Very Soft Contaminated Sediments. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 31(4), 570–577.
Zeman, A.J. and Patterson, T.S., 2003. Sediment Sampling at Randle Reef, Hamilton Harbour. Environment Canada NWRI Contribution Number 03-172.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
