Developing restoration targets for nearshore fish populations in two Areas of Concern in Lake Ontario

Authors

  • J. N. Bowlby Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 41 Hatchery Lane, Picton, Ontario K0K 2T0, Canada
  • J. A. Hoyle Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 41 Hatchery Lane, Picton, Ontario K0K 2T0, Canada

Keywords:

Hamilton Harbour, Toronto Harbour, fish community, embayment, exposed, sheltered

Abstract

Restoration targets for nearshore fish populations in Hamilton Harbour and Toronto Harbour–Areas of Concern–were developed. Fish were captured in trap nets at Hamilton Harbour, Toronto Harbour, and nine unimpaired embayments of Lake Ontario. Embayments were sampled at least once and up to nine times during 2006–2013. Principal components analysis indicated the fish communities in unimpaired embayments clustered into two groups. One group had larger exposure distance (opening) to Lake Ontario and larger exposure index (surface area ÷ opening), and was termed “exposed.” The alternate group was “sheltered.” Fish communities in unimpaired embayments followed an aquatic macrophyte gradient of open-water species (e.g. White Bass, Gizzard Shad) at one end and species associated with vegetative cover (e.g. Bluegill, Pumpkinseed) at the other. A second fish community gradient was correlated with embayment opening and exposure index, and may be associated with habitat stability and exchanges with colder water from Lake Ontario. Hamilton Harbour is a sheltered embayment, but principal components analysis indicated the fish community was significantly different from all other embayments, consistent with its Area of Concern status. Northern Pike and Yellow Perch were the only target species in Hamilton Harbour close in abundance to unimpaired sheltered embayments. Common Carp, Brown Bullhead, Channel Catfish, and others were an order of magnitude higher than in unimpaired sheltered embayments. Toronto Harbour is an exposed embayment, and principal components analysis indicated the fish community was not significantly different from unimpaired embayments. Likewise, the abundance of most of the target species in Toronto Harbour was close to unimpaired embayments. Walleye, Smallmouth Bass, and Rock Bass were depressed and Gizzard Shad was elevated in Toronto Harbour, compared to unimpaired embayments.

References

Boston, C.M., Randall, R.G., Hoyle, J.A., Mossman, J.L., Bowlby, J.N., 2016. The fish community of Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario: status, stressors and remediation over 25 years. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 19(2), 206–218.

Bowlby, J. N., McCormack, K., Heaton, M. G., 2010. Hamilton Harbour and Watershed Fisheries Management Plan. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Royal Botanical Gardens, Burlington.

Brousseau, C.M., Randall, R.G., Hoyle, J.A., Minns, C.K., 2011. Fish community indices of ecosystem health: How does the Bay of Quinte compare to other coastal sites in Lake Ontario? Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 14(1), 75–84.

Chambers, P.A., 1987. Nearshore occurrence of submerged aquatic macrophytes in relation to wave action. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 1666–1669.

Chu, C., Koops, M.A., Randall, R.G., Kraus, D., Doka, S.E., 2014. Linking the land and the lake: a fish habitat classification for the nearshore zone of Lake Ontario. Freshw. Sci. 33, 1159–1173.

Doolittle, A.G., Bakelaar, C.N., Doka, S.E., 2010. Spatial framework for storage and analyses of fish habitat data in Great Lakes' Areas of Concern: Hamilton Harbour geodatabase case study. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2879.

Eakins, R. J., 2015. Ontario Freshwater Fishes Life History Database. Version 4.55. On-line database. (http://www.ontariofishes.ca), accessed 22 March 2015.

Environment Canada and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 2011. Bay of Quinte Area of Concern - Status of Beneficial Use Impairments. Fact sheet. Cat. No.: En164-22/2-2011E-PDF.

Gasith, A., Hoyer, M.V., 1998. Structuring role of macrophytes in lakes: changing influence along lake size and depth gradients. Ecological Studies 131, 381–392.

Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Office, 2012. Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Beneficial Uses: 2012 Fact Sheets. Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Stakeholder Forum.

Hiriart-Baer, V.P., Boyd, D., Long, T., Charlton, M.N., Milne, J.E., 2016. Hamilton Harbour over the last 25 years: insights from a long-term comprehensive water quality monitoring program. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 19(2), 124–133.

Holmes, J. A., Whillans, T. H., 1984. Historical review of Hamilton Harbour fisheries. Can. Tech Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1257, 1–177.

Hoyle, J. A., Yuille, M. J., 2016. Nearshore fish community assessment on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River: a trap net-based Index of Biotic Integrity. J. Great Lakes Res. 42(3), 687–694.

Hoyle, J.A., Bowlby, J.N., Mathers, A., Schaner, T., Eckert, T.H., Casselman, J.M. 2007. The nearshore fish community. In: Morrison B.J., LaPan, S.R., The State of Lake Ontario in 2003, pp. 45–58. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 07-01.

Hoyle, J. A., Bowlby, J. N., Brousseau, C. M., Johnson, T. B., Morrison, B. J., Randall, R. G., 2012. Fish community structure in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario: The influence of nutrient levels and invasive species. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 15(4), 370–384.

Hurley, D. A., 1986. Fish populations of the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, before and after phosphorous control. Can. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Spec. Pub. 86, 201–214.

Hurley, D. A., Christie, W.J., 1977. Depreciation of the warmwater fish community in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34, 1849–1860.

Lougheed, V.L., Theÿsmeÿer, T., Smith, T., Chow-Fraser, P., 2004. Carp exclusion, food-web interactions, and the restoration of Cootes Paradise marsh. J. Great Lakes Res. 30, 44–57.

Metro Toronto and Region RAP Office, 1994. Clean Waters, Clear Choices Recommendations for Action. Metro Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan. Toronto, Canada.

Minns, C. K., Cairns, V. W., Randall, R. G., Moore, J. E., 1994. An Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes Area of Concern. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 51, 1804–1822.

Murphy, S. C., Collins, N. C., Doka, S. E., 2011. Thermal habitat characteristics for warmwater fishes in coastal embayments of Lake Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res. 37, 111–123.

O'Connor, K.M., 2003. Remedial Action Plan for Hamilton Harbour: Stage 2 Update 2002. Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Office, Burlington.

Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure, 2012. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006 Office Consolidation. January 2012.

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR), 2014. Lake Ontario Fish Communities and Fisheries: 2013 Annual Report of the Lake Ontario Management Unit. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Picton, Ontario, Canada.

Rao, Y. R., Murthy, C. R., 2001. Nearshore currents and turbulent exchange processes during upwelling and downwelling events in Lake Ontario. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 2667–2678.

Rao, Y.R., C. M. Marvin, J. Zhao., 2009. Application of a numerical model for circulation, temperature and pollutant distribution in Hamilton Harbour. J. Great Lakes Res. 35, 61–73.

Scott, W.B., Crossman, E.J., 1973. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 184, 1–966.

StatSoft, Inc., 2007. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0.

Stewart, T.J., Bowlby, J.N., 2009. Chinook salmon and rainbow trout catch and temperature distributions in Lake Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res. 35, 232–238.

Stewart, T.J., Todd, A., LaPan, S., 2013. Fish Community Objectives for Lake Ontario. Great Lakes Fishery Commission, ON.

Stirling, M., 1999. Manual of Instructions: Nearshore Community Index Netting (NSCIN). Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Simcoe Fisheries Assessment Unit. Sutton West, Ontario.

Theÿsmeÿer, T., Boucher, N., Faulkenham, S., 2002. Grindstone estuary rehabilitation Floodplain restoration techniques at Royal Botanical Gardens, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Royal Botanical Gardens.

Thomaz, S.M., Cunha, E.R., 2010. The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages' composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnol. Bras. 22, 218–236.

Whillans, T. H., 1979. Historic transformations of fish communities in three Great Lakes bays. J. Great Lakes Res. 5, 195–215.

Wilson, S.D., Keddy, P.A., 1986. The relationship between plant competitive ability and position along a natural gradient of stress and disturbance: a field experiment. Ecology 67, 1236–1242.

Published

2017-07-03