Efficacy of decoys and familiar versus unfamiliar playback calls in attracting Common Terns to a rehabilitated wetland on Lake Ontario
Keywords:
social attractants, nesting habitat, wetland rehabilitationAbstract
Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) are colonial-nesting waterbirds that have experienced long-term population declines on the Great Lakes. Lack of nesting habitat, especially due to competition with Ring-billed Gulls (Larus delwarensis), is thought to be an important cause of this decline. Therefore, it is important to create and maintain good nesting habitats for Common Terns, as was done in Windermere Basin, a historically polluted wetland in Hamilton Harbour. It was extensively restored from 2010–2013, including the construction of three new habitat islands designed for Common Tern nesting. We used playback systems and decoys to attract Common Terns to the new islands in 2013 and assessed the effectiveness of three different call types: local colony sounds recorded in Hamilton Harbour, foreign calls recorded elsewhere in the Great Lakes, and on the Atlantic Coast of North America. These playback types were rotated through sound systems on the three new islands, and a control island had no equipment. Two-hundred and seventy-three pairs of Common Terns successfully nested in the new habitat, and 244 chicks were hatched. However, we did not find evidence that social attractants were effective. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the effect of the Hamilton Harbour, Great Lakes and Atlantic Coast of North America playbacks on Common Tern numbers or nests, but there was a significant negative effect of Gull numbers on Tern numbers. Colonizing individual Terns likely had prior experience nesting in Windermere Basin, and took advantage of the newly available habitat. These early colonizers would have been more salient to other Terns than the social attractants used in our experiment. Gull numbers declined after we carried out several nest removals (under permit). Therefore, availability of good quality habitat, with Gull numbers controlled, appeared important in re-establishing colonies of Common Terns in the Great Lakes region. Further research is required on the efficacy of social attractants.
References
Arnold, J. M., Nisbet, I. C. T., Veit, R., 2011. Assessing aural and visual cueing as tools for seabird management. J. of Wildlife Mgmt. 75(3), 495–500.
Austin, O. L., 1949. Site tenacity, a behaviour trait of the Common Tern (Sterna hirundo Linn). Bird-Banding 1–39.
Austin, O. L., 1951. Group adherence in the Common Tern. Bird-Banding 1–15.
Blokpoel, H., Courtney, P.A., 1982. Immigration and recruitment of Common Terns and Ring-billed Gulls on the lower Great Lakes. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes No. 133, 1–12.
Blokpoel, H., Caitling, P., Haymes, G., 1978. Relationship between nest sites of Common Terns and vegetation on eastern headland, Toronto outer harbor. Cdn. J. of Zoology 56(9), 2057–2061.
Blokpoel, H., Tessier, G. D., Andress, R. A., 1997. Successful restoration of the ice island Common Tern colony requires on-going control of Ring-billed Gulls. Colonial Waterbirds 20(1), 98–101.
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., White, J. S. S., 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(3), 127–135.
Buckley, F. G., Buckley, P. A., 1982. Microenvironmental determinants of survival in saltmarsh-nesting Common Terns. Colonial Waterbirds 5, 39–48.
Burger, J., 1988. Social attraction in nesting least terns: Effects of numbers, spacing, and pair bonds. The Cond. 90(3), 575–582.
Burger, J., Gochfeld, M. (Eds.), 1991. The Common Tern: Its breeding biology and social behavior. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Burness, G. P., Morris, R. D., 1992. Shelters decrease gull predation on chicks at a Common Tern colony. J. of Field Ornithology 63(2), 186–189.
Burson III, S. L., 1990. Population genetics and gene flow of the Common Tern. Condor. 182–192.
Burt, J., Syrinx-PC (Version 2.6h) [Software]. Available from: http://www.syrinxpc.com/syrinxform.html
Cohen, E. B., Hostetler, J. A., Royle, J. A., Marra, P. P., 2014. Estimating migratory connectivity of birds when re‐encounter probabilities are heterogeneous. Ecology and Evolution 4(9), 1659–1670.
Courtney, P. A., Blokpoel, H., 1980. Food and indicators of food availability for Common Terns on the lower Great Lakes. Cdn. J. of Zoology 58(7), 1318–1323.
Courtney, P. A., Blokpoel, H., 1983. Distribution and numbers of Common Terns on the lower great lakes during 1900–1980: A review. Colonial Waterbirds 6, 107–120.
Dettmers, J. M., Goddard, C. I., Smith, K. D., 2012. Management of Alewife using Pacific Salmon in the Great Lakes: Whether to manage for economics or the ecosystem? Fisheries 37(11), 495–501.
Haymes, G.T., Blokpoel, H., 1978. Seasonal distribution and site tenacity of the Great Lakes Common Tern. Bird-Banding 49(2), 142–151.
Helka, J., Bassingthwaite, M., 2013. On the waterfront; enhancement project transforms Windermere Basin into a diverse coastal wetland. The Ontario Technologist 55(1), 22–25.
Jeffries, D. S., Brunton, D. H., 2001. Attracting endangered species to ‘safe’ habitats: Responses of fairy terns to decoys. Animal Conservation 4(4), 301–305.
Kotliar, N. B., Burger, J., 1984. The use of decoys to attract Least Terns (Sterna antillarum) to abandoned colony sites in New Jersey. Colonial Waterbirds 7, 134–138.
Kress, S. W., 1983. The use of decoys, sound recordings, and gull control for re-establishing a tern colony in Maine. Colonial Waterbirds 6, 185–196.
McNicholl, M. K., 1975. Larid site tenacity and group adherence in relation to habitat. The Auk. 92(1), 98–104.
Morris, R. D., Pekarik, C., Moore, D. J., 2012. Current status and abundance trends of Common Terns breeding at known coastal and inland nesting regions in Canada. Waterbirds 35(2), 194–207.
Morris, R. D., Weseloh, D. V., Cuthbert, F. J., Pekarik, C., Wires, L. R., Harper, L., 2010. Distribution and abundance of nesting common and Caspian Terns on the North American Great Lakes, 1976 to 1999. J. of Gr. Lakes Res. 36(1), 44–56.
Morris, R. D., Weseloh, D. V., Wires, L. R., Pekarik, C., Cuthbert, F. J., Moore, D. J., 2011. Population trends of Ring-billed Gulls breeding on the North American Great Lakes, 1976 to 2009. Waterbirds 34(2), 202–212.
Nisbet, I.C., 2002. Common Tern (Sterna hirundo), The birds of North America online (A. Poole, Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/618. September, 2013.
O'Connell, T. J., Beck, R. A., 2003. Gull predation limits nesting success of terns and skimmers on the Virginia barrier islands. J. of Field Ornithology 74(1), 66–73.
O'Gorman, R., and Stewart, T. J., 1999. Ascent, dominance, and decline of the alewife in the Great Lakes: food web interactions and management strategies. Great Lakes fisheries policy and management: a binational perspective. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., 2013. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3, 1–113.
Quinn, J. S., Morris, R. D., Blokpoel, H., Weseloh, D. V., Ewins, P. J., 1996. Design and management of bird nesting habitat: tactics for conserving colonial waterbird biodiversity on artificial islands in Hamilton Harbour, Ontario. Cdn. J. of Fisheries and Aquatic Sci. 53(S1), 45–57.
R Development Core Team, 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. September, 2013.
Richards, M. H., Morris, R. D., 1984. An experimental study of nest site selection in Common Terns. J. of Field Ornithology 55(4), 457–466.
Roby, D. D., Collis, K., Lyons, D. E., Craig, D. P., Adkins, J. Y., Myers, A. M., Suryan, R.M., 2002. Effects of colony relocation on diet and productivity of Caspian Terns. J. of Wildlife Mgmt. 66(3), 662–673.
Safina, C., Burger, J., Gochfeld, M., Wagner, R. H., 1988. Evidence for prey limitation of common and roseate tern reproduction. The Condor 90(4), 852–859.
Weseloh, D. V. C., Hamr, P., Bishop, C. A., Norstrom, R. J., 1995. Organochlorine contaminant levels in waterbird species from Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario: an IJC area of concern. J. Great Lakes Res. 21, 121–137.
Zanchetta, C.V., Moore, D.J., Weseloh, C., Quinn, J.S., 2016. Population trends of colonial waterbirds nesting in Hamilton Harbour in relation to changes in habitat and management. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 19(2), 192–205.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
