Assessment of the degradation of aesthetics Beneficial Use Impairment in the Toronto and region Area of Concern

Authors

  • S. C. Dahmer Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Dr., Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4, Canada
  • L. Matos Environment and Climate Change Canada, 4905 Dufferin St. Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
  • S. Jarvie Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Dr., Downsview, Ontario M3N 1S4, Canada

Keywords:

Area of Concern, water quality

Abstract

Toronto and Region was designated a Great Lakes Area of Concern in 1987 due to significant degradation of environmental quality and impaired beneficial uses, including Degradation of Aesthetics. Historically overflows of combined sewers, direct discharge of poorly treated industrial wastewater, contaminated storm water, and litter contributed to excessive floating debris, odour and unnatural turbidity along parts of the waterfront and in some sections of Area of Concern watersheds. Despite the perception of poor aesthetic quality of these waters, little to no monitoring was carried out to assess the Degradation of Aesthetics Beneficial Use Impairment due to the challenge of reporting aesthetics in a quantifiable, unbiased manner. Here we describe the qualitative monitoring program implemented in the Toronto region to assess the aesthetic condition of local watersheds. An Aesthetic Quality Index developed for use by Areas of Concern was adapted by taking advantage of existing monitoring programs and local expertise. Results of the assessment indicate that no persistent objectionable deposit, unnatural colour or turbidity, or unnatural odour was present in the Toronto region during the period of study.

References

Azevedo Lopes, F.W., Davies-Colley, R. J., Von Sperling, E., Magalhães Jr., A.P., 2016. A water quality index for recreation in Brazilian freshwaters. Journal of Water and Health 14(2), 243–254.

D’Andrea, M., and Anderton, R., 1996. Assessment of tributary discharges along the Metropolitan Toronto waterfront. Report prepared for the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan.

George, T.K., and Boyd, D., 2001. Limitations on the Development of Quantitative Monitoring Plans to Track the Progress of Beneficial Use Impairment Restoration at Great Lakes Areas of Concern. J. Great Lakes Res. 33, 686–692.

Heidtke, T. M., Tauriainen, E., 1996. An Aesthetic Quality Index for the Rouge River. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University. Detroit, Michigan.

House, M.A., 1996. Public perception and water quality management. Wat. Sci. Tech. 34(12), 25–32.

International Joint Commission (IJC), 1991. Guidelines for recommending the listing and delisting of Great Lakes Areas of Concern. In: FOCUS on International Joint Commission Activities Newsletter March/April 1991. 16(1): 1–5. ISSN 0832-6673.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, 2016. Bacteria: A naturally-occurring phenomenon.

Stewart, R., 2016. Degradation of Aesthetics 2015 Pilot Survey and Protocol Development for Future Monitoring. Report prepared for the Thunder Bay Remedial Action Plan.

Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan Team (RAP), 1989. Metro Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan. Stage I Environmental conditions and problem definition. ISBN: 0-7778-1656-3.

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), 2018. Toronto and Region Watersheds Report Card 2018.

Published

2018-07-03