Remediation of a Beneficial Use Impairment at Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto Area of Concern

Authors

  • T. A. Edge Environment and Climate Change Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canda
  • S. Hill Environment and Climate Change Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canda
  • A. Crowe Environment and Climate Change Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canda
  • J. Marsalek Environment and Climate Change Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canda
  • P. Seto Environment and Climate Change Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7S 1A1, Canda
  • B. Snodgrass City of Toronto, Toronto Water, Toronto, Ontario, Canda
  • R. Toninger Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Ontario, Canada
  • M. Patel City of Toronto, Toronto Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Keywords:

E. coli , microbial source tracking

Abstract

Bluffer’s Park Beach in the Toronto and Region Area of Concern had a history of beach postings often exceeding 80% of the beach season since the 1980s. A study applied expanded E. coli surveillance and microbial source tracking techniques in 2005–2007 to identify fecal pollution sources contributing to beach postings. Expanded surveillance in the beach vicinity identified significant E. coli hotspots in the foreshore beach sand (pore water max E. coli = 255,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and associated with a marsh inland of the beach. During rain events, streams from the marsh (max E. coli = 173,000 CFU 100 ml−1) and runoff from the parking lot (max E. coli = 4100 CFU 100 ml−1) were observed to overflow across the beach to contaminate beach waters. Microbial source tracking using library-dependent (antibiotic resistance and rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting of E. coli isolates) and library-independent (human HF183 bacterial DNA marker) methods indicated the prevalence of animal fecal pollution sources at the beach rather than human sewage. These results were consistent with sanitary survey information, observations of wildlife in the marsh area, and Gulls and Canada Geese on the beach. In 2006, a bird management program was initiated, and remedial actions continued in advance of the 2008 bathing season to engineer a berm to prevent marsh runoff into beach water and re-direct parking lot drainage into the marsh. Since these remediation actions, Bluffer’s Park Beach has been posted less than 20% of each beach season, and it was awarded a Blue Flag accreditation in 2011.

References

Alm, E.W., Burke, J., Spain, A., 2003. Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches. Water Res. 37, 3978–3982.

City of Toronto, 2006. Beach postings in 2005 and actions to improve water quality at City beaches. Staff Report to Policy and Finance Committee. April 6, 2006, Toronto.

City of Toronto, 2007. Recreational water quality at Bluffer’s Park Beach. Staff Report to Board of Health. November 20, 2007, Toronto.

City of Toronto, 2009. Great City, Great Beaches – Toronto Beaches Plan. January 2009, City of Toronto. (www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-18573.pdf)

Converse, R.R., Kinzelman, J.L., Sams, E.A., Hudgens, E., Dufour, A.P., Ryu, H., Santo-Domingo, J.W., Kelty, C.A., Shanks, O.C., Siefring, S.D., Haugland, R.A., Wade, T.J., 2012. Dramatic improvements in beach water quality following gull removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(18), 10206–10213.

Edge, T.A., Hill, S., 2007. Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Water Res. 41, 3585–3594

Edge, T.A., Schaefer, K.A. (Eds.), 2006. Microbial source tracking in aquatic ecosystems: the state of the science and an assessment of needs. National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario. NWRI Scientific Assessment Report Series No. 7, and Linking Water Science to Policy Workshop Series.

Edge, T.A., Crowe, A., Hill, S., Seto, P., Marsalek, J., 2007a. Surveillance for Sources of E. coli at Toronto’s Bluffer’s Park Beach 2005-06. Water Science & Technology Directorate Technical Note No. AEP-TN07-003. Environment Canada. Burlington, Ontario.

Edge, T.A., Hill, S., Stinson, G., Seto, P., Marsalek, J., 2007b. Experience with antibiotic resistance analysis and DNA fingerprinting in tracking faecal pollution at two lakes beaches. Water Sci. Technol. 56, 51–58.

Edge, T.A., Hill, S., Seto, P., Marsalek, J., 2010. Library-dependent and library-independent microbial source tracking to identify spatial variation in faecal contamination sources along a Lake Ontario beach (Ontario, Canada). Water Sci. Technol. 62, 719–727.

Environmental Defence, 2004. Making Waves: An evaluation of Toronto’s beaches for the Blue Flag Program. Environmental Defence and City of Toronto.

Kinzelman, J.L., McLellan, S. L., 2009. Success of science-based best management practices in reducing swimming bans—a case study from Racine, Wisconsin, USA. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 12(2), 187–196.

Lu, J., Ryu, H., Hill, S., Schoen, M., Ashbolt, N., Edge, T.A., Santo Domingo, J., 2011. Distribution and potential significance of a gull fecal marker in urban coastal and riverine areas of southern Ontario, Canada. Water Research 45, 3960–3968.

McLellan, S.L., Salmore, A.K., 2003. Evidence for localized bacterial loading as the cause of chronic beach closings in a freshwater marina. Water Res. 37(11), 2700–2708.

Sauer, E.P., VandeWalle, J.L., Bootsma, M.J., McLellan, S.L., 2011. Detection of the human specific Bacteroides genetic marker provides evidence of widespread sewage contamination of stormwater in the urban environment. Water Res. 45(14), 4081–4091.

Staley, Z.R., Edge,T.A., 2016. Comparative microbial source tracking methods for identification of fecal contamination sources at Sunnyside Beach in the Toronto Region Area of Concern. J. Water and Health 14, 839–850.

Staley, Z., Grabuski, J., Sverko, E., Edge, T.A., 2016. Comparison of microbial and chemical source tracking markers to identify fecal contamination sources in the Humber River and associated stormwater outfalls. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 82, 6357–6366.

TRCA (Toronto and Region Concervation Authority), 2005. Performance assessment of a flow balancing and wetland treatment system – Toronto, Ontario. Report prepared by the Stormwater Assessment Monitoring and Performance Program. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, April 2005.

TRCA (Toronto and Region Concervation Authority), 2016. Within Reach: 2015 Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan Progress Report. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, Ontario.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 2005. Microbial source tracking guide. EPA/600-R-05-064. Office of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Vogel, L.J., O’Carroll, D.M., Edge, T.A., Robinson, C.E., 2016. Release of Escherichia coli from foreshore sand and pore water during intensified wave conditions at a recreational beach. Environmental Science & Technology 50, 5676–5684.

Whitman, R.L., Nevers, M.B., 2003. Foreshore sand as a source of Escherichia coli in nearshore water of a Lake Michigan beach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69(9), 5555–5562.

Published

2018-07-03