Assessing fish consumption Beneficial Use Impairment at Great Lakes Areas of Concern: Toronto case study

Authors

  • Satyendra P. Bhavsar Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (OMECP), Toronto, Ontario M9P 3V6, Canada
  • Ken G. Drouillard University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada
  • Rex W. K. Tang Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada
  • Laud Matos Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), North York, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
  • Margaret Neff Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (OMECP), Toronto, Ontario M9P 3V6, Canada

Keywords:

Area of Concern, eating fish, PCB, mercury

Abstract

Beneficial use of fish consumption was designated impaired in the 1980s in many Areas of Concern across the North American Great Lakes. Remedial Action Plans have guided the restoration of beneficial use impairments with the goal of delisting the Areas of Concern. Here we present generic re-designation criteria and a three-tier Assessment Framework to assess the status of the fish consumption beneficial use impairments using the Toronto and Region Area of Concern as a case study. Tier 1 assessment identified that consumption advisories for many resident fish on the Toronto waterfront are non-restrictive (8+ meals month−1). Advisory assessments in Tier 1 found that most migratory fish species, Carp and White Sucker are still restrictive in some cases preventing a ‘not impaired’ re-designation. Tier 2 Comparison with Reference Sites found that the advisories for most local fish are either non-restrictive or similar to reference locations in Lake Ontario, but some advisories due to elevated levels of polychlorinated biphenyl are still more restrictive for the Toronto waterfront and do not favour a ‘not impaired’ re-designation. An evaluation of multiple lines of evidence in Tier 3 including fish contaminant trend analyses, time to reach target fish levels, sediment concentrations and fish consumption patterns resulted in outcomes ranging from neutral (not conclusive) to not impaired. As a precautionary approach, the impaired status of the beneficial use impairment should be maintained to ensure continued polychlorinated biphenyl declines in fish. It is recommended that the Remedial Action Plan team update the fish consumption survey, investigate where additional feasible actions can be taken including examining potential polychlorinated biphenyl sources on the Humber and Don Rivers, and collect new data to undertake a future assessment.

References

Awad, E., 2006. The results of the 2003 Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish questionnaire. Ontario Ministry of the Environ., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Bhavsar, S.P., Fletcher, R., Hayton, A., Reiner E.J., Jackson D.A., 2007a. Composition of dioxin-like PCBs in fish: An application for risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3096–3102.

Bhavsar, S.P., Hayton, A., Reiner, E.J., Jackson, D.A., 2007b. Estimating dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl toxic equivalents from total polychlorinated biphenyl measurements in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 1622–1628.

Bhavsar, S.P., Jackson, D.A., Hayton, A., Reiner, E.J., Chen, T., Bodnar, J., 2007c. Are PCB levels in fish from the Canadian Great Lakes still declining? J. Great Lakes Res. 33, 592–605.

Bhavsar, S.P., Awad, E., Fletcher, R., Hayton, A., Somers, K.M., Kolic, T., MacPherson, K., Reiner, E.J., 2008. Temporal trends and spatial distribution of dioxins and furans in lake trout or lake whitefish from the Canadian Great Lakes. Chemosphere 73, S158–S165.

Bhavsar, S.P., Gewurtz, S.B., McGoldrick, D.J., Keir, M.J., Backus, S.M., 2010. Changes in mercury levels in Great Lakes fish between 1970s and 2007. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3273–3279.

Bhavsar, S.P., Awad, E., Mahon, C.G., Petro, S., 2011. Great Lakes fish consumption advisories: is mercury a concern? Ecotoxicology 20, 1588–1598.

Carlson, D.L., De Vault, D., Swackhamer, D., 2010. On the rate of decline of persistent organic contaminants in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) from the Great Lakes, 1970-2003. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2004–2010.

Environment Canada, Environment Ontario, Ministry of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 1989. Metro Toronto Remedial Action Plan: Environmental conditions and problem definition (Stage 1). Metro Toronto Remedial Action Plan, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Gandhi, N., Tang, R., Bhavsar, S., Reiner, E., Morse, D., Arhonditsis, G., Drouillard, K., Chen, T., 2015. Is mirex still a contaminant of concern for the North American Great Lakes? J. Great Lakes Res. 41, 1114–1122.

Gandhi, N., Drouillard, K.G, Arhonditsis, G.B., Gewurtz, S.B., Bhavsar, S.P., 2017. Are fish consumption advisories for the Great Lakes adequately protective against chemical mixtures? Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 586–593.

Gewurtz, S.B., Bhavsar, S.P., Jackson, D.A., Fletcher, R., Awad, E., Moody, R., Reiner, E.J., 2010. Temporal and spatial trends of organochlorines and mercury in fishes from the St. Clair River/Lake St. Clair corridor, Canada. J. Great Lakes Res. 36, 100–112.

Gewurtz, S.B., Bhavsar, S.P., Fletcher, R., 2011. Influence of fish size and sex on mercury/PCB concentration: Importance for fish consumption advisories. Environ. Int. 32, 425–434.

Gilbert, B., Kaltenecker, G., Helm, P., 2010. Toronto Tributary Toxics Assessment 2003-2009: Water Quality Data Summary (DRAFT). Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

IJC, 1991. Restoring beneficial uses in Areas of Concern.

Kraft, D., 1998. From panfish to trophy fish: A profile of fishing and fish consumption in the Toronto Area. Fish and Wildlife Nutrition Project funded by Health Canada’s Great Lakes Health Effects Program (Project Number K341813).

Neff, M.R., Robinson, J.M., Bhavsar, S.P., 2013. Assessment of fish mercury levels in the upper St. Lawrence River, Canada. J. Great Lakes Res. 39, 336–343.

Neff, M.R., Stefanoff, S., Bhavsar, S.P., 2016. Improvements in fish polychlorinated biphenyl and other contaminant levels in response to remedial actions in Hamilton Harbour, Ontario, Canada. Aquatic Ecosystem Health Management 19 (2), 161–170.

OMOECC, 2015. 2015-2016 Guide to Eating Ontario Fish. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

OMOECC, 2017. 2017-2018 Guide to Eating Ontario Fish. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Pickard, S.W., Yaksich, S.M., Irvine, K.N., McFarland, V.A., 2001. Bioaccumulation potential of sediment-associated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio. J. Great Lakes Res. 27, 44–59.

Robinson, J.M., Neff, M.R., Bhavsar, S.P., 2015. Assessment of contaminant levels in fish from the Toronto waterfront area. J. Great Lakes Res. 41, 228–237.

TRCA, 2011. Public guide to the Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan Beneficial Use Impairment Criteria Review and Update. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Toronto RAP, 2016. Within Reach: 2015 Toronto and Region Remedial Action Plan Progress Report. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

U.S.EPA, 2006. Results of the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project: Polychlorinated Biphenyls Modeling Report. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

U.S.EPA, 2015. Fish Consumption Advisories. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/fishadvisories/index.cfm. Accessed August 2015.

U.S.EPA, 2016. Guidance for Conducting Fish Consumption Surveys. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.

Published

2018-07-03