Symmetry and solitude: Status and lessons learned from binational Areas of Concern

Authors

  • Matthew Child International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
  • Jennifer Read University of Michigan Water Center, Graham Sustainability Institute, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Jeff Ridal St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences, Cornwall, ON, Canada
  • Michael Twiss Department of Biology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA

Keywords:

Great Lakes, environmental governance, case studies, remediation

Abstract

Areas of Concern are geographically distinct areas within the waters of the Great Lakes that are contaminated to the extent that they were originally identified by the International Joint Commission’s Water Quality Board and later codified in the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement as areas requiring remedial actions. Five of the 43 Areas of Concern are binational (Canada, USA), and are located on every river or connecting channel that drains a Great Lake. Implementing an ecosystem approach, as called for in the Agreement, presents unique challenges for binational Areas of Concern due to multiple jurisdictions and communities, and hence greater institutional, program and participatory complexity. Our review of progress in each of the binational Areas of Concern suggests that a binational and ecosystem-oriented approach is underway in the St. Marys, St. Clair and Detroit River Areas of Concern, while the Niagara River and St. Lawrence River Areas of Concern are proceeding on decidedly more independent domestic tracks. Our case study analysis of the Detroit River and St. Lawrence River Areas of Concern suggest that well developed and formal governance frameworks, the establishment of informal networks, and maintaining flexibility within a science-focused approach create conditions better suited to a binational, ecosystem-oriented means of remediation.

References

Canada and Ontario

, 2014. Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health. Accessed at https://ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=E9A42FF1-1 September 21, 2017.

Canada and United States

, 2013. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Accessed at http://www.ijc.org/en_/Great_Lakes_Water_Quality September 21, 2017.

Canada and United States

, 2016. 2016 Progress Report of the Parties. Accessed at https://binational.net/2016/09/28/prp-rep/ September 21, 2017.

Clean Sites

, no date. Final Report: Assessment of Concerns Related to the Detroit River Binational Public Advisory Council. Report prepared for US EPA.

Delongchamp, T. M.

, Lean, D. R.

, Ridal, J. J.

, Blais, J. M.

, 2009. Sediment mercury dynamics and historical trends of mercury deposition in the St. Lawrence River area of concern near Cornwall, Ontario, Canada. Science of the Total Environment. 407(13), 4095–4104.

Delongchamp, T. M.

, Ridal, J. J.

, Lean, D. R.

, Poissant, L.

, Blais, J. M.

, 2010. Mercury transport between sediments and the overlying water of the St. Lawrence River area of concern near Cornwall, Ontario. Environmental Pollution. 158(5), 1487–1493.

Detroit River Canadian Cleanup

, 2010. Detroit River Remedial Action Plan, Stage 2 report. Accessed at http://detroitriver.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Detroit_River_Canadian_Stage_2_Remedial_Action_Plan_FINAL_DIGITAL.pdf November 20, 2017.

Detroit River Canadian Cleanup

, 2017. Pathway to Delisting. Accessed at http://detroitriver.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Detroit-River-Canadian-Delisting-Plan_June2017.pdf November 20, 2017.

Duffy, B.T.

, Baldigo, B.P.

, Smith, A.J.

, George, S.D.

, David, A.M.

, 2016. Assessing condition of macroinvertebrate communities and sediment toxicity in the St. Lawrence at Massena Area of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 42(4), 910–919.

Environment Canada and Ontario Ministry of the Environment

, 2008. The Cornwall Sediment Strategy. Accessed at https://www.rrca.on.ca/_files/file/brochure-Cornwall-Sediment-Strategy.pdf?phpMyAdmin=415bcc74a9c69072ce5800d6de86a905 December 15, 2017.

Environment Canada, United States Environmental Protection Agency

, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Ontario Ministry of Environment, 2012. Compendium of Position Papers: A Four Agency Framework of Roles and Responsibilities for Implementation of the Detroit River, St. Clair River, St. Marys River Areas of Concern Shared Remedial Action Plans and the Lake St. Clair Management Plan. Accessed at http://www.delistingdetroitriver.com/policy-framework/four-agency-framework September 21, 2017.

George, T.K.

, Boyd, D.

, 2007. Limitations on the Development of Quantitative Monitoring Plans to Track the Progress of Beneficial Use Impairment Restoration at Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33, 686–692.

Gurtner-Zimmermann, A.

, 1995. A Mid-Term Review of Remedial Action Plans: Difficulties With Translating Comprehensive Planning into Comprehensive Action. Journal of Great Lakes Research 21(2), 234–247.

Hall, J.D.

, O’Connor, K.

, Ranieri, J.

, 2006. Progress Toward Delisting a Great Lakes Area of Concern: The Role of Integrated Research and Monitoring in the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113, 227–243.

Hartig, J.H.

, Law, N.

, 1994. Institutional Frameworks to Direct Development and Implementation of Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans. Environmental Management 18(6), 855–864.

Hartig, J.H.

, Thomas, R.L.

, 1988. Development of Plans to Restore Degraded Areas in the Great Lakes. Environmental Management 12(3), 327–347.

Hartig, J.H.

, Vallentyne, J.R.

, 1989. Use of and Ecosystem Approach to Restore Degraded Areas of the Great Lakes. Ambio 18(8), 423–428.

Hartig, J.H.

, Zarull, M.A.

, Heidtke, T.M.

, Shah, H.

, 1998. Implementing Ecosystem-based Management: Lessons from the Great Lakes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(1), 45–75.

Hartig, J.H.

, Kerr, J.K.

, Breederland, M.

, 2001. Promoting soft engineering along Detroit River shorelines. Land and Water-The Magazine of Natural Resource Management and Restoration 45(6), 24–27.

International Joint Commission

, 1985. Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Accessed at http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ijcarchive/340/ September 21, 2017.

International Joint Commission

, 1997. Detroit River Area of Concern Status Assessment. Accessed at http://www.ijc.org/php/publications/html/detroit.html December 8, 2017.

Keller, B.J.

, Back, R.C.

, Westrick, J.

, Werner, M.

, Evans, B.

, Moerke, A.

, Zimmerman, G.

, Wright, D.D.

, Grenfell, E.

, Courneya, J.

, 2011. Sediment quality at select sites in the St. Mary’s Area of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37, 12–20.

Krantzberg, G.

, 2003. Keeping Remedial Action Plans on Target: Lessons Learned from Collingwood Harbour. Journal of Great Lakes Research 29(4), 641–651.

MacKenzie, S.H.

, 1993. Ecosystem Management in the Great Lakes: Some Observations from Three RAP Sites. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19(1), 136–144.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

, 2008. Guidance for Delisting Michigan’s Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Report MI/DEQ/WB-06/001.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

, 2017. Areas of Concern Program Public Advisory Council. Accessed at http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-3313_3677_15430_15432-321594–,00.html September 21, 2017.

Milani D

, Grapentine, L.

, 2009. Benthic conditions in the St. Lawrence River at Cornwall, 2007. WSTD Contribution No. 09-555. Environment Canada, Burlington, Ontario.

Mohawk Governments of Akwesasne

, 1988, Position paper dated February 29 accessed at https://semspub.epa.gov/work/02/381575.pdf December 15, 2017.

NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environment Conservation)

, 1990. St. Lawrence River at Massena Remedial Action Plan Stage 1. Accessed at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/stlawrap_st1_1990.pdf December 15, 2017.

NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation)

, 1991. St. Lawrence River at Massena Remedial Action Plan Stage II. Accessed at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/massenarapstageii91.pdf December 15, 2017.

NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation)

, 2006. St. Lawrence River at Massena, New York Remedial Action Plan Status Report. Accessed at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/massenarapupdate06.pdf December 15, 2017.

Rambol Environ

, 2017. Long-term monitoring approaches: St. Lawrence River AOC Zones 1-3. Final Report prepared for Environment and Climate Change Canada, Downsview, ON. Project #CA1200747A.

Richman, L.A.

, Dreier, S.I.

, 2001. Sediment contamination in the St. Lawrence River along the Cornwall, Ontario waterfront. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27, 60–83.

Ritcey, A.

, 2010. The Future of the St. Lawrence River at Cornwall, Ontario Post-Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Navigating Toward Sustainability. MES thesis, Queen’s University. Accessed at http://qspace.library.queensu.ca/bitstream/handle/1974/6123/Ritcey_Alicia_L_201009_MES.pdf?sequence=1

Roseman, E.F.

, Manny, B.A.

, Boase, J.

, Kennedy, G.

, Child, M.

, Craig, J.

, Soper, K.

, Drouin, R.

, 2011. Lake Sturgeon Response to a Spawning Reef Constructed in the Detroit River. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27 (Suppl. 2), 66–76.

St. Lawrence RAP Team

, 1992. Stage 1 Report: Environmental Conditions and Problem Definitions. Accessed at https://www.rrca.on.ca/_files/file/RAP/St%20Lawrence%20RAP%20Stage%201%20Environmental%20Conditions%20and%20Problem%20Definitions.pdf December 15, 2017.

Sproule-Jones, M.

, 2002.

Restoration of the Great Lakes: promises, practices, performances

. University of British Columbia Press, BC.

State University of New York (SUNY)

, 1993. Connecting Channel Areas of Concern: Strategies for Implementing Remedial Action Plans. Donald W. Rennie Memorial Monograph Series: Great Lakes Monograph No. 5.

State University of New York (SUNY)

, 1996. From Obstacles to Opportunities: Improving Binational RAP Coordination. Donald W. Rennie Memorial Monograph Series: Great Lakes Monograph No. 9.

Stewart, R.M.

, Rashid, H.

, 2011. Blending science and public policies for remediation of a degraded ecosystem: Jackfish Bay, north shore of Lake Superior, Canada. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37, 256–262.

Stryszowska, K.M.

, Twiss, M.R.

, Langen, T.A.

, 2016. Evaluating Beneficial Use Impairments in Wetlands of the Massena Area of Concern using biotic, water quality, and landscape indicators. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42(3), 708–716.

Tarbell, H

. 1988. Letter to USEPA Administrator. Accessed at https://semspub.epa.gov/work/02/381425.pdf December 15, 2017.

United States Environmental Protection Agency

, 2014. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan II. Accessed at https://www.glri.us/actionplan/index.html September 21, 2017.

United State Environmental Protection Agency

, 2017. About Detroit River AOC. Accessed at https://www.epa.gov/detroit-river-aoc/about-detroit-river-aoc April 21, 2017.

Published

2018-10-02