Remedies for improving Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans: A Policy Delphi study
Keywords:
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, governance, policy learningAbstract
Remedial Action Plans continue to be the principal program to operationalize an ecosystem approach to the restoration of degraded locations across the Laurentian Great Lakes called Areas of Concern. Initiated in 1985, the progress of Remedial Action Plans on balance has been slow and disappointing. The Remedial Action Plan program has been continued following revisions to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 2012 despite very little systematic inspection of its strengths and limitations. Further, the 2012 Agreement calls for a “nearshore framework” with no clarity on the process for understanding place-based governance methods as developed under these Remedial Action Plans. In this context, we conducted a three-round anonymous online Policy Delphi study involving several dozen experts in the development and implementation of Remedial Action Plans from across the Great Lakes basin within government, industry, academia and civil society. Round 1 collected their direct knowledge of the strengths and limitations of Remedial Action Plans. We distilled that knowledge and asked study participants in Round 2 to further reflect on what worked and what did not work in their experience as Remedial Action Plan practitioners. We found an expected diversity of opinion on what ails the program in Round 2, but an unexpected consensus on the desire to move forward with seven governance options that emerged and were ranked by participants in Round 3. Rankings also indicated a consensus that the options were somewhat feasible and likely to succeed as enhancements to the current governance of Remedial Action Plans. Importantly, the results relate to both the structure and attributes of these collaborative processes, and we therefore stress the need to focus on the predominant tendencies and characteristics that underline Remedial Action Plan processes. These findings will have broad significance for evolving place-based nearshore restoration strategies in the Great Lakes and elsewhere as such programs are initiated.
References
ARC (Agreement Review Committee)
, 2007. Report to the Great Lakes Binational Executive Committee: Volumes 1, 2, and 3.
Armitage, D.
, Berkes, F.
, Doubleday, N.
, 2007.
Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance
. UBC Press, Vancouver.
Botts, L.
, Muldoon, P.
, 2005. Evolution of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Michigan State University Press, Michigan.
Buck, A.J.
, Gross, M.
, Hakim, S.
, Weinblatt, J.
, 1993. Using the Delphi process to analyze social policy implementation: A post hoc case from vocational rehabilitation. Policy Sciences 26, 271–288.
Bulkley, J.W.
, Donahue, M.J.
, Regier, H.A.
, 1989. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreements: how to assess progress toward a goal of ecosystem integrity. In:
C.G. Gunnerson
(Ed.),
Post Audits of Environmental Programs and Projects
, pp. 27–42. Proceedings of a session sponsored by the Environmental Impact Analysis Research Council of the American Society of Civil Engineers in conjunction with the ASCE Convention in New Orleans, Louisiana, 11 Oct 1989.
Burton, I.
, Huq, S.
, Lim, B.
, Pilifosova, O.
, Schipper, E.L.
, 2002. From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policies. Climate Policy 2, 145–159.
Caldwell, L.K.
, 1988. Implementing an ecological systems approach to basin-wide management. In:
L K. Caldwell
(Ed.),
Perspectives on Ecosystem Management for the Great Lakes: A Reader
, pp. 1–29. State University of New York Press, NY.
Carlsson, L.
, Berkes, F.
, 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75, 65–76.
Colborn, T.E.
, Davidson, A.
, Green, S.N.
, Hodge, R.A.
, Jackson, C.I.
, Liroff, R.A.
, 1990. Great Lakes, Great Legacy? The Conservation Foundation and the Institute for Research on Public Policy, Halifax, N.S.
Collins, J.
, Hanlon, A.
, More, S.J.
, Wall, P.G.
, Duggan, V.
, 2009. Policy Delphi with vignette methodology as a tool to evaluate the perception of equine welfare. The Veterinary Journal 181, 63–69.
Curtin, C.G.
, Parker, J.P.
, 2014. Foundations of resilience thinking. Conservation Biology 28, 912–923.
Dalkey, N.
, Helmer, O.
, 1963. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 9, 458–467.
de Loë, R.
, 1995. Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi. Applied Geography 15, 53–68.
Franklin, K.K.
, Hart, J.K.
, 2007. Idea generation and exploration: benefits and limitations of the policy Delphi method. Innovation in Higher Education 31, 237–246.
Gabb, J.
, Balen, R.
, Gibbs, G.
, Hall, C.
, Teal, A.
, 2006. Victoria Climbié inquiry data corpus project: using the Delphi method in multidisciplinary child protection research. British Journal of Social Work 36, 577–596.
GAO (United States General Accounting Office
), 2003. Great Lakes: an overall strategy and indicators for measuring progress are needed to better achieve restoration goals. Report GAO-03-515.
GAO (United States General Accounting Office
), 2009. EPA needs a cohesive plan to clean up the Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Report 09-P-0231.
Gerlak, A.K.
, 2014. Policy interactions in human–landscape systems. Environmental Management 53, 67–75.
Gurtner-Zimmerman, A
., 1995. A mid-term review of Remedial Action Plans: difficulties with translating comprehensive planning into comprehensive action. Journal of Great Lakes Research 21, 234–247.
Hartig, J.H.
, Law, N
., 1994. Institutional frameworks to direct development and implementation of Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans. Environmental Management 18, 855–864.
Hartig, J.H.
, Thomas, R.L
., 1988. Development of plans to restore degraded areas in the Great Lakes. Environmental Management 12, 327–47.
Hartig, J.H.
, Vallentyne, J.R
., 1989. Use of an ecosystem approach to restore degraded areas of the Great Lakes. Ambio 18, 423–428.
Hartig, J.H.
, Zarull, M.A
., 1992a. A Great Lakes mission. In:
J.H. Hartig
,
M.A. Zarull
(Eds.),
Under RAPs: Toward Grassroots Ecological Democracy in the Great Lakes Basin
, pp. 5–35. University of Michigan Press.
Hartig, J.H.
, Zarull, M.A
., 1992b. Keystones for success. In:
J.H. Hartig
,
M.A. Zarull
(Eds.),
Under RAPs: Toward Grassroots Ecological Democracy in the Great Lakes Basin
, pp. 263–279. University of Michigan Press.
Hartig, J.H.
, Lovett-Doust, L.
, Zarull, M.A.
, Leppard, S.
, New, L.A.
, Skavroneck, S.
, Eder, T.
, Coape-Arnold, T.
, Daniel, G
., 1991. Overcoming obstacles in Great Lakes remedial actions plans. International Environmental Affairs 3, 91–107.
Hartig, J.H.
, Law, N.L.
, Epstein, D.
, Fuller, K.
, Letterhos, J.
, Krantzberg, G
., 1995. Capacity-building for restoring degraded areas in the Great Lakes. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2, 1–10.
Hartig, J.H., Zarull, M.A., Reynoldson, T.B., Mikol, G., Harris, V.A., Randall, R.G., Cairns, V.W., 1997. Quantifying targets for rehabilitating degraded areas of the Great Lakes. Environmental Management 21, 713–723.
Hartig, J.H.
, Zarull, M.A.
, Law, N.L.
, 1998. An ecosystem approach to Great Lakes management: practical steps. Journal of Great Lakes Research 24, 739–750.
Hooghe, L.
, Marks, G
., 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97, 233–243.
IJC (International Joint Commission)
, Second Biennial Report. 1984.
IJC (International Joint Commission)
, 2003. Status of restoration activities in Great Lakes areas of concern: a special report.
IJC (International Joint Commission
), 2006a. Advice to Governments on their Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: A Special Report to the Governments of Canada and the United States.
IJC (International Joint Commission),
b. Priorities 2003-2005: Priorities and Progress under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
IJC (International Joint Commission)
, 2006c. Thirteenth Biennial Report.
IJC (International Joint Commission)
, 2009. Work group report on nearshore framework.
Kalafatis, S.E.
, Campbell, M.
, Fathers, F.
, Laurent, K.L.
, Friedman, K.B.
, Krantzberg, G.
, Scavia, D.
, Creed, I.F
., 2015. Out of control: how we failed to adapt and suffered the consequences. Journal of Great Lakes Research 41(S1), 20–29.
Kellogg, W.A
., 1998. Adopting an ecosystem approach: local variability in Remedial Action Planning. Society & Natural Resources 11, 465–483.
Krantzberg, G
., 1998. After more than ten years of effort, are Remedial Action Plans making a difference? Journal of Great Lakes Research 24, 485–486.
Krantzberg, G
., 2002. Restoring active participation. Journal of Great Lakes Research 28,491–492.
Krantzberg, G
., 2003. Keeping remedial action plans on target: lessons learned from Collingwood Harbour. Journal of Great Lakes Research 29, 641–651.
Krantzberg, G
., 2012. The Remedial Action Plan program, historical and contemporary overview. In:
Grover, I.
, Krantzberg, G.
, (Eds.), Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance, pp. 245–256. CRC Press.
Krantzberg, G.
, Houghton, E
., 1996. The Remedial Action Plan that led to the cleanup and delisting of Collingwood Harbour as an Area of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research 22, 469–483.
Landre, B.K.
, Knuth, B.A
., 1993. The role of agency goals and local context in Great Lakes water resources public involvement programs. Environmental Management 17, 153–165.
Lee, B.J.
, Regier, H.A.
, Rapport, D.J
., 1982. Ten ecosystem approaches to the planning and management of the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 8, 505–519.
Linstone, H.A.
, Turoff, M.
, (Eds.)., 1975.
The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications
. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Boston, MA.
Lubell, M.
, Sabatier, P.A.
, Vedlitz, A.
, Focht, W.
, Trachtenberg, Z.
, Matlock, M
., 2005. Conclusions and recommendations. In:
P.A. Sabatier
,
W. Focht
,
M. Lubell
,
Z. Trachtenberg
,
A. Vedlitz
,
M. Matlock
(Eds.),
Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management
, pp. 261–296. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
MacKenzie, S.H
., 1993. Ecosystem management in the Great Lakes: some observations from three RAP sites. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19, 136–144.
MacKenzie, S.H
., 1997. Toward integrated resource management: lessons about the ecosystem approach from the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environmental Management 21, 173–183.
Manno, J.
, Krantzberg, G
., 2008. Rediscovering and revitalizing the Great Lakes governance. In:
K. Bosselmann
,
R. Engel
,
P. Taylor
(Eds.),
Governance for Sustainability Issues, Challenges, Successes
, pp. 159–170. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 70.
McLaughlin, C
., 2011. On the Evolution of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: From Pathological Management to Adaptive Governance? Sketches of Learning From Experience. PhD Dissertation, McMaster University. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McLaughlin, C
., 2012. Innovations in decision making. In:
I. Grover
,
G. Krantzberg
(Eds.),
Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance
, pp. 67–104. CRC Press, FL.
McLaughlin, C.
, Krantzberg, G
., 2011. An appraisal of policy implementation deficits in the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37, 390–396.
McLaughlin, C.
, Krantzberg, G
., 2012. An appraisal of management pathologies in the Great Lakes. Science of the Total Environment 416, 40–47.
Miller, A
., 1985. Ideology and environmental risk management. The Environmentalist 5, 21–30.
Miller, A
., 1999.
Environmental Problem Solving: Psychosocial Barriers to Adaptive Change
. Springer, NY.
Moore, M.-L.
, von der Porten, S.
, Plummer, R.
, Brandes, O.
, Baird, J
., 2014. Water policy reform and innovation: a systematic review. Environmental Science & Policy 38, 263–271.
Muldoon, P
., 2012. Governance in the Great Lakes: a regime in transition. In:
I. Grover
,
G. Krantzberg
(Eds.),
Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance
, pp. 44–66. CRC Press.
Munton, D
., 1988. Toward a more accountable process: the Royal Society-National Research Council Report. In: I. Grover, G. Krantzberg (Eds.),
Perspectives on Ecosystem Management for the Great Lakes: A Reader
, pp. 299–317. State University of New York Press.
Needham, R.D.
, de Loë, R.C
., 1990. The Policy Delphi: purpose, structure, and application. The Canadian Geographer 34, 133–142.
NRC-RSC (National Research Council of the United States and The Royal Society of Canada).
The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: An Evolving Instrument For Ecosystem Management. National Academy Press, Washington.
OAG (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
., 2001. A legacy worth protecting: charting a sustainable course in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin; Chapter 1 of the Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.
OAG (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
., 2008. Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin; Chapter 7 of the Status Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.
OPAC (Ontario Public Advisory Council).
Great Lakes Hotspots: Ontario Citizens Speak Up: Highlights. Ontario Public Advisory Council.
Plummer, R.
, Armitage, D.R
., 2007a. A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics 61, 62–74.
Plummer, R.
, Armitage, D.R
., 2007b. Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: a Delphi study. Ecology and Society 12(2), art10.
Regier, H.A.
, Jones, M.L.
, Addis, J.
, Donahue, M
., 1999. Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River basin assessments. In:
K.N. Johnson
,
F.J. Swanson
,
M. Herring
,
S. Greene
, (Eds.),
Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy
, pp. 133–165. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Richards, L
., 2009.
Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide
. Second edition. Sage Publications, California.
Sabatier, P.A.
, Focht, W.
, Lubell, M.
, Trachtenberg, Z.
, Vedlitz, A.
, Matlock, M.
, (Eds). 2005.
Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management
. MIT Press, MA.
Saldaña, J
., 2009.
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
. Sage Publications, CA.
Susskind, L
., 2013. Water and democracy: new roles for civil society in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development 29, 666–677.
Taljaard, S.
, Slinger, J.H.
, van der Merwe, J
., 2013. Dual adaptive cycles in implementing integrated coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management 84, 23–30.
Turoff, M
., 1970. The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2,149–171.
Turoff, M
., 1975. The policy Delphi. In:
H.A. Linstone
,
M. Turoff
(Eds.),
The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications
, pp. 84–100. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
U.S. Great Lakes Interagency Task Force
, 2017. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Report to Congress and the President.
Vallentyne, J.R.
, Beeton, A.M
., 1988. The ecosystem approach to managing human uses and abuses of natural resources in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental Conservation 15, 58–62.
Westley, F
., 1995. Governing design: the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In: L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, S.S. Light (Eds.),
Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Regional Ecosystems
, pp. 391–427. Columbia University Press, NY.
Westley, F
., 2002. The devil is in the dynamics: adaptive management on the front lines. In: L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling (Eds.),
Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems
, pp. 333–360. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Witting, A
., 2017. Insights from ‘policy learning’ on how to enhance the use of evidence by policymakers. Palgrave Communications 3, art49.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.
