Transferring lessons learned from use of an ecosystem approach to restore degraded areas of North American Great Lakes to the Arabian Gulf

Authors

  • John H. Hartig Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON
  • Mohiuddin Munawar Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, ON
  • Waleed Hamza Biology Department, College of Science, University of United Arab Emirates
  • Faiza Al-Yamani Biology Department, College of Science, University of United Arab Emirates

Keywords:

Arabian Sea, restoration, cooperative learning

Abstract

Canada and USA have over a 100-year history of international cooperation on Great Lakes management. For over 30 years, federal, state, and provincial governments have successfully used locally-defined ecosystem approaches to develop and implement remedial action plans to restore beneficial uses impairments in 43 Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Each remedial action plan identifies use impairments/causes, remedial/preventive actions to restore uses, and implementation responsibilities and timeframes. Areas of concern are removed from the list when all uses are restored. Long-term efforts are needed to ensure sustainability through adaptive management. Shared resources, like the Arabian Gulf and Great Lakes, require collaboration among boundary countries to achieve common goals. A network of regional technical and governmental representatives could be established under or affiliated with the Regional Organization of Protecting Marine Environment to promote cleanup and ecosystem-based management of degraded areas of the Sea. It would have to be flexible, not prescriptive, science-based, action-oriented, and result in well recognized benefits to all partner countries. Workshops or conferences could be convened to address ecosystem issues. This network must be value-added and build capacity, and could eventually lead to use of locally-defined ecosystem approaches to develop cleanup plans for degraded areas of the Gulf, similar to Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Gulf countries, through the Regional Organization of Protecting Marine Environment and with support of a network, could then come together every three-five years to report on progress, identify research needs, celebrate successes, and establish next steps. Gulf I, II, and III conferences are building blocks for such a network. A logical next step would be to engage the Regional Organization of Protecting Marine Environment in the establishment of a network for ecosystem-based management and co-sponsorship of a Gulf IV Conference or other forum. In the spirit of cooperative learning, further exchanges of both scientific research and management practices would be beneficial between the Great Lakes and the Gulf.

References

Ahmed, M.H.

, EI-Raey, M.

, Nasr, S.M.

, 1998. Socioeconomic impact of pollution on ecosystems of the Arabian Gulf. Environment International 24 (1/2), 229–237.

Canada and the U.S.

, 1987. Protocol Amending the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

Government of Canada

, 2014. Canada-Ontario Agreement on the Great Lakes. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Government of Canada and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

, 1995. The Great Lakes: An environmental atlas and resource book. Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Great Lakes Commission

, 2018. Investing in a national asset: A leadership agenda for Great Lakes restoration and revitalization. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Great Lakes Fishery Commission

, 2018. The Great Lakes fishery: A world-class resource. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Haas, P.M.

, 2002. Science policy for multilateral environmental governance. United Nations University, Institute for Advanced Studies. Tokyo, Japan.

Hamza, W.

, Munawar, M.

, 2009. Protecting and managing the Arabian Gulf: Past, present and future. Aquatic Ecosystem Health Mgmt. 12(4), 429–439.

Hartig, J.H.

, 1988. Remedial action plans: A Great Lakes program whose time has come! In:

D.H. Hitchcox

(Ed.),

The Great Lakes: Living with North America's Inland Waters

, pp.45–51. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, Virginia.

Hartig, J.H.

, 1997. Great Lakes remedial action plans: Fostering adaptive ecosystem-based management processes. The American Review of Canadian Studies. Autumn, 437–458.

Hartig, J.H.

, Thomas, R.L.

, 1988. Development of plans to restore degraded areas in the Great Lakes. Environmental Management 12, 327–347.

Hartig, J.H.

and Vallentyne, J.R.

, 1989. Use of an ecosystem approach to restore degraded areas of the Great Lakes. Ambio 18(8), 423–428.

Hartig, J.H.

, Zarull, M.A

. (Eds.), 1992.

UNDER RAPS - Toward grassroots ecological democracy in the Great Lakes Basin

. The Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Hartig, J.H.

, Dodge, D.

, Jester, D.

, Atkinson, J.

, Thoma, R.

, Cullis, K.

, 1996. Toward integrating remedial action planning and fishery management planning in Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Fisheries 21 (2), 6–13.

Hartig, J.H.

, Zarull, M.A.

, Mikol, G.

, Reynoldson, T.B.

, Harris, V.A.

, Randall, R.G.

, Cairns, V.W.

, 1997. Quantifying targets for rehabilitating degraded areas of the Great Lakes. Environmental Management. 21 (5), 713–723.

Hartig, J.H.

, Zarull, M.A.

, Law, N.L.

, 1998. An ecosystem approach to Great Lakes management: Practical steps. J. Great Lakes Res. 24 (3), 739–750.

Hartig, J.H.

, Krantzberg, G.

, Munawar, M.

, Doss, M.

, Child, M.

, Kalinauskas, R.

, Richman, L.

, Blair, C.

, 2018. Achievements, and lessons learned from 32-year old Canada-U.S. effort to restore impaired beneficial uses in Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Aquatic Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 21(4), 506–520.

IJC

, 1985. Report on Great Lakes water quality. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

IJC

, 1987. Guidance on characterization of toxic substances problems in Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

IJC

, 1988a, Procedures for the assessment of contaminated sediment problems in the Great Lakes. Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

IJC

, 1988b. Options for the remediation of contaminated sediments in the Great Lakes. Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

Khan, N.Y.

, 2007. Multiple stressors and ecosystem-based management in the Gulf. Aquatic Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 10(3), 259–267 DOI: 10.1080/14634980701551168

Kelso, J.R.M.

, Hartig, J.H

. (Eds.), 1995. Methods of modifying habitat to benefit the Great Lakes ecosystem. Can. Inst. Sci. Tech. Inf., Occas. Pap. No. 1.

Martin Associates

, 2018.

Economic impacts of maritime shipping in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Region

. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA.

Nadim, F.

Bagtzoglou, A.C.

, Iranmahboob, J.

, 2008. Coastal management in the Persian Gulf region within the framework of the ROPME programme of action. Ocean & Coastal Management 51 (7), 556–565.

Naser, H.A.

, 2013. Marine Ecosystem Diversity in the Arabian Gulf: Threats and Conservation. Biodiversity, Oscar Grillo, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/57425. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/biodiversity-the-dynamic-balance-of-the-planet/marine-ecosystem-diversity-in-the-arabian-gulf-threats-and-conservation

Rathke, D.E.

, Hartig, J.H.

, 1987. Characterization of toxic substances problems in the Great Lakes. IEEE Oceans '87 Conf. Proc. 1526–1530.

Rezai, H.

, Wilson, S.

, Claereboudt, M.

, and Riegl, B.

, 2014. Coral reef status in the ROPME Sea area: Arabian/Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea. In:

C. Wilkinson

(Ed.),

Status of Coral Reefs in the World

. pp. 155 -170. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facreports/45.

Sheppard, C.

, Al-Husiani, M.

, Al-Jamali, F.

, Al-Yamani, F.

, Baldwin, R.

, Bishop, J.

, Benzoni, F.

, Dutrieux, E.

, Dulvy, N.K.

, Durvasula, S.R.

, Jones, D.A.

, Loughland, R.

, Medio, D.

, Nithyanandan, M.

, Pilling, G.M.

, Polikarpov, I.

, Price, A.R.

, Purkis, S.

, Riegl, B.

, Saburova, M.

, Namin, K.S.

, Taylor, O.

, Wilson, S.

, Zainal, K.

, 2010. The Gulf: A young sea in decline. Marine Pollut. Bull. 60(1), 13–38.

USA and Canada

, 1909.

The Boundary Waters Treaty

. Washington, D.C., USA.

Vallentyne, J.

, Beeton, A.

, 1988. The ‘Ecosystem’ Approach to Managing Human Uses and Abuses of Natural Resources in the Great Lakes Basin. Environmental Conservation 15(1), 58–62.

Van Lavieren, H.

, Klaus, R.

, 2013. An effective regional Marine Protected Area network for the ROPME Sea Area: Unrealistic vision or realistic possibility? Marine Pollution Bulletin. 72 (2), 389–405.

Zarull, M.A.

, Hartig, J.H.

, 2001. Aquatic ecosystem rehabilitation: Targets, actions and responses. Aquatic Ecosyst. Health Mgmt. 4(1), 115–122.

Published

2019-04-03