Quantitative Mitigation Analysis: An ecosystem valuation tool to facilitate planning, restoration and mitigation
Keywords:
compensatory mitigation, ecosystem servicesAbstract
Globally, human development has proceeded at a rapid pace for the past several decades for both terrestrial and aquatic/marine environments. Project developers, government decision-makers and the public have had little data regarding the relative values of natural resources, or losses thereof, to facilitate project – and corresponding natural resource takings/ecosystem degradation – decision-making, resulting in intrinsic, but poorly quantified, environmental degradation.
Accordingly, we have found that an effective strategy for communicating the value of ecosystems and related natural resources to facilitate smart resource management is to monetize the replacement value of resource losses from development. A number of tools have been developed for monetizing resource value, including quantitative mitigation analysis to address compensating for ecosystem and related natural resource losses due to human development.
Quantitative Mitigation Analysis is a methodology developed to assist project developers and regulatory agencies alike with developing or evaluating cost-effective, defensible, quantitatively based compensatory mitigation strategies for developments that result in the taking of, or diminution in quality to, habitats and related natural resources. Quantitative Mitigation Analysis quantifies loss of ecological function from proposed developments and determines the amount of mitigation required as compensation. This paper introduces and describes Quantitative Mitigation Analysis and presents a case example that demonstrates how Quantitative Mitigation Analysis may be applied to construction projects resulting in substantive habitat destruction for the benefit of project developers and the regulatory community alike.
References
Arrigoni, J., 2016. 345 kV Transmission Line Project Forest Habitat Suitability Analysis for Migratory Birds. Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Chess, P, and Haberthur, B., 2016. Potential Woodland Habitat Restoration Projects for Migratory Birds. Natural Resources Forest Preserve District. Prepared October 16, 2016.
Chicago Department of Environment, 2007. A habitat guide for Chicago Land Owners: Enhancing your property for birds. Prepared by Department of Environment and Audubon Chicago Region.
Landwatch, 2016. Land price information for counties of interest accessed at www.landwatch.com on June 8, 2016.
NCC, 2015. Developing corporate natural capital accounts. Final Report For the Natural Capital Committee. January 2015. Eftec. London, England.
NOAA, 2000. Habitat Equivalency Analysis: An Overview. Damage Assessment and Restoration Program. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Department of Commerce. March 21, 1995 (Revised October 4, 2000).
NOAA, 2016. Habitat Equivalency Analysis. https://coast.noaa.gov/archived/coastal/economics/habitatequ.htm. Accessed June 4, 2016.
Reilly, T.J., French-McCay, D., Grant, J.R., Rowe, J., 2012. Application of ecosystem-based analytic tools to evaluate natural resource damage assessments and environmental impact assessment in the ROPME Sea Area. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society 15(2), 1–11.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.