Data fusion of terrestrial laser scanner and remotely piloted aircraft systems points clouds for monitoring the coastal protection systems
Keywords:
geometric accuracy, coastal monitoring, structure from motion, data fusionAbstract
Frequently exposed to natural agents such as waves, wind, tides, storm activity, seasonal changes and anthropogenic agents, coastal areas are tangibly high energy environments and therefore subject to considerable dynamics. In order to mitigate and reduce the impacts on these areas, different types of coastal protection systems can be implemented. Rockwalls and breakwaters are the most ordinary structures and even if used precisely for coastal protection, these flexible structures can in turn be damaged or ineffective over time. Therefore, like the monitoring of coastal areas in terms of execution frequency and accuracy, the measurement of changes over time of these structures, in particular after significant events, can allow to carry out an economic maintenance service before a serious occurrence and costly damage. However, given the rapid evolution of the preservation state of coastal areas and protection structures, it is therefore essential to plan an equally frequent, practical and accurate structural-coastal monitoring. On the other hand, their accessibility can sometimes be dangerous or uncomfortable such as to compromise operations in the field. In this work, the application of two close-range detection techniques competitor, i.e. from the Terrestrial Laser Scanner and from Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems, aimed at the generation of three-dimensional reconstructions of a protection structure, was analyzed. By performing a cloud-to-cloud comparison, interesting considerations have been obtained on the precision that can be achieved and on the technical limits deriving from the two methodologies. Considering the economy and practicality of use, if used correctly, a Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems supported by a suitable geo-referencing and an optimized data processing, can produce accurate and coherent 3D reconstructions as those derivable from the Terrestrial Laser Scanner. Finally, the results obtained by merging the point clouds generated from the two different techniques were evaluated in order to identify any advantages in the structural maintenance of the systems.
References
Bracci, F., Drauschke, M., Kühne, S., Márton, Z. C., 2018. Challenges in Fusion of Heterogeneous Point Clouds. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 155–162. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-155-2018
Delaney, R., Shakoor, A., Watts, C. F., 2019. Comparing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), Terrestrial LiDAR, and Brunton Compass Methods for Discontinuity Data Collection, Cham.
Farella, E. M., Torresani, A., Remondino, F., 2019. Quality Features for the Integration of Terrestrial and UAV Images. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W9, 339–346. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-339-2019
Joshua, B., Igwe, C. F., Adekunle, I., 2016. Modelling and Assessment of Coastal Changes at Golspie Beach, Scotland, UK; An Integration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetric Techniques, for an Effective Coastal Land use Management. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology 2(3), 361–371.
King, S., Leon, J., Mulcahy, M., Jackson, L., Corbett, B., 2017. Condition Survey of Coastal Structures Using UAV and Photogrammetry.
Lague, D., Brodu, N., Leroux, J., 2013. Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z). ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009
Medjkane, M., Olivier, M., Costa, S., Roulland, T., Letortu, P., Fauchard, C., Antoine, R., Davidson, R., 2018. High-resolution monitoring of complex coastal morphology changes: cross-efficiency of SfM and TLS-based survey (Vaches-Noires cliffs, Normandy, France).
Moon, D., Chung, S., Kwon, S., Seo, J., Shin, J., 2019. Comparison and utilization of point cloud generated from photogrammetry and laser scanning: 3D world model for smart heavy equipment planning. Automation in Construction, 98, 322–331. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.020
Nikolakopoulos, K. G., Koukouvelas, I. K. (2018). UAVs for the rapid assessment of the damages in the coastal zone after a storm (Vol. 10773): SPIE.
Nikolakopoulos, K. G., Kozarski, D., Kogkas, S., 2017. Coastal areas mapping using UAV photogrammetry (Vol. 10428): SPIE.
Roşca, S., Suomalainen, J., Bartholomeus, H., Herold, M., 2018. Comparing terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle structure from motion to assess top of canopy structure in tropical forests. Interface Focus 8(2), 20170038. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2017.0038
Saponaro, M., Tarantino, E., Fratino, U., 2018. Geometric Accuracy Evaluation of Geospatial Data Using Low-Cost Sensors on Small UAVs. Paper presented at the Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018, Cham.
Saponaro, M., Tarantino, E., Reina, A., Furfaro, G., Fratino, U., 2019. Assessing the Impact of the Number of GCPS on the Accuracy of Photogrammetric Mapping from UAV Imagery. Baltic Surveying 10, 43–51.
Seier, G., Stangl, J., Schöttl, S., Sulzer, W., Sass, O., 2017. UAV and TLS for monitoring a creek in an alpine environment, Styria, Austria. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(8-10), 2903–2920. doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1277045
Published
Issue
Section
License
Manuscripts must be original. They must not be published or be under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. It is required that the lead author of accepted papers complete and sign the MSU Press AEHM Author Publishing Agreement and provide it to the publisher upon acceptance.