Classification of Typha-dominated wetlands using airborne hyperspectral imagery along Lake Ontario, USA

Authors

  • Glenn M. Suir U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Geospatial Data Analysis Facility, ATTN: CEERD-EE-C, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, USA
  • Douglas A. Wilcox Department of Environmental Science and Ecology, SUNY Brockport, 350 New Campus Drive, Brockport, New York 14420
  • Molly Reif U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Geospatial Data Analysis Facility, ATTN: CEERD-EE-C, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, USA

Keywords:

wetland classification, Maximum Likelihood Classifier, wetland monitoring

Abstract

Shoreline wetlands along Lake Ontario are valuable, multi-functional resources that have historically provided large numbers of important ecosystem goods and services. However, alterations to the lake’s natural hydrologic regime have impacted traditional meadow marsh in the wetlands, resulting in competition and colonization by dense and aggressive Typha angustifolia and Typha x glauca (Cattails). The shift to a Typha-dominated landscape resulted in an array of negative impacts, including increased Typha density, substantial decreases in plant species richness and diversity, and altered habitat and changes in associated ecosystem services. Successful long-term adaptive management of these wetland resources requires timely and accurate monitoring. Historically, wetland landscapes have been surveyed and mapped using field-based surveys and/or photointerpretation. However, given their resource- and cost-intensive nature, these methods are often prohibitively time- and labor-consuming or geographically limited. Other remote sensing applications can provide more rapid and efficient assessments when evaluating wetland change trajectories or analyzing direct and indirect impacts across larger spatial and temporal scales. The primary goal of this study was to develop and describe methodology using U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Coastal Mapping Program hyperspectral imagery, light detection and ranging data, and high-spatial resolution true-color imagery to provide updated wetland classifications for Lake Ontario coastal wetlands. This study used existing field-collected vegetation survey data (Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program), ancillary imagery, and existing classification information as training data for a supervised classification approach. These data were used along with a generalized wetland schema (classes based on physical and biological gradients: elevation, Typha, meadow marsh, mixed emergent, upland vegetation) to generate wetland classification data with Kappa values near 0.85. Ultimately, these data and methods provide helpful knowledge elements that will allow for more efficient inventorying and monitoring of Great Lake resources, forecasting of resource condition and stability, and adaptive management strategies.

References

AlbertD.A., WilcoxD.A., IngramJ.W., ThompsonT.A., 2005. Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal wetlands. J. Great Lakes Res. 31 (Suppl. 1), 129–146.

AllenY.C., SuirG.M., 2014. Using high-resolution, regional-scale data to characterize floating aquatic nuisance vegetation in coastal Louisiana navigation channels. ERDC/TN-APCRP-EA-27. U.S. Army Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.

AndersonK., GastonK.J., 2013. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11(3), 138-146.

Bourgeau-ChavezL.L., RiordanK., PowellR.B., MillerN. and NowelsM., 2009. Improving wetland characterization with multi-sensor, multi-temporal SAR and optical/infrared data fusion. In: JedlovecG. (Ed.), Advances in geoscience and remote sensing, pp. 679-708. Intech, West Palm Beach, FL.

Bourgeau-ChavezL.L, EndresS., BattagliaM., MillerM.E., BandaE., LaubachZ., HigmanP., Chow-FraserP. and MarcaccioJ., 2015. Development of a bi-national Great Lakes coastal wetland and land use map using three-season PALSAR and Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing 7(7), 8655-8682.

BrixH., SchierupH.H., 1989. The use of aquatic macrophytes in water-pollution. Ambio 18, 100–107.

BroussardW.I., SuirG.M., VisserJ.M., 2018. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and satellite imagery collections in a coastal intermediate marsh to determine the land-water interface, vegetation types, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values. United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.

CampbellJ.B., WynneR.H., 2011. Introduction to Remote Sensing, 5th edition. The Guildford Press, NY.

CarleM.V. 2013. Spatial structure and dynamics of the plant communities in a Pro-Grading River Delta: Wax Lake Delta, Atchafalaya Bay, Louisiana. PhD Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

ChangC.I., 2013. Hyperspectral data processing: algorithm design and analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

DigitalGlobe. 2010. The benefits of the 8 spectral bands of WorldView-2. In: White Paper Longmont. DigitalGlobe, CO.

DrakslerA., CronJ. and MengI.L., 2017. The Effect of Satellite Image Resolution and Minimum Mapping Unit on the Accuracy of Forest Cover Maps. Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species and implications for management and research. National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC.

HowardT.G., FeldmannA.L., SpencerE., RingR.R, PerkinsK.A., CorserJ., 2016. Wetland monitoring for Lake Ontario adaptive management. New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, NY.

JakubauskasM.E., PetersonD.L., CampbellS.W., deNoyellesF., CampbellS.D., PennyD., 2002. Mapping and monitoring invasive aquatic plant obstructions in navigable waterways using satellite multispectral imagery. FIEOS 2002 Conference Proceedings.

JensenJ.R. 2015. Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall Press, NJ.

JollineauM.Y., HowarthP.J., 2008. Mapping an inland wetland complex using hyperspectral imagery, Int. J. Remote Sens. 29, 3609–3631. DOI: 10.1080/01431160701469099.

JuddC., SteinbergS., ShaughnessyF. and CrawfordG., 2007. Mapping salt marsh vegetation using aerial hyperspectral imagery and linear unmixing in Humboldt Bay, California. Wetlands 27(4), pp.1144-1152.

KowalskiK.P., WilcoxD.A., 1999. Use of historical and geospatial data to guide the restoration of a Lake Erie coastal marsh. Wetlands 19, 858-868.

KwangE.K., 1996. Adaptive majority filtering for contextual classification of remote sensing data, Int. J. Remote Sens. 17, 1083–1087. DOI: 10.1080/01431169608949070

LefskyM.A., CohenW.B., ParkerG.G., HardingD.J., 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52(1), 19-30.

LillesandT.M., KieferR.W., ChipmanJ.W., 2008. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 6th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

MitchellM.E., LishawaS.C., GeddesP., LarkinD.J., TreeringD., TuchmanN.C., 2011. Time-dependent impacts of cattail invasion in a Great Lakes coastal wetland complex. Wetlands 31, 1143–1149.

MitschW.J., GosselinkJ.G., 2000. Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York, NY.

NelsonM.L., BrewerC.K., SolemS.J., 2015. Existing vegetation classification, mapping, and inventory technical guide, version 2.0. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO–90. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff.

Office of Technology Assessment, 1993. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment; OTA-F-565. Available online at http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ota/Ota_1/DATA/1993/9325.pdf

ParkJ.Y., TuellG., 2010. Conceptual design of the CZMIL data processing system (DPS): algorithms and software for fusing lidar, hyperspectral data, and digital images. Proc. SPIE 7695, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XVI, 769510. doi: 10.1117/12.851976

PoirrierM.A., Burt-UtleyK., UtleyJ.F., SpaldingE.A., 2010. Submersed aquatic vegetation of the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve. Southeast. Nat. 9, 477–486.

ReifM.K., MaconC.L., WozencraftJ.M., 2011. Post-Katrina land-cover, elevation, and volume change assessment along the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, USA. J. Coastal Res. 62, 30–39.

ReifM.K., WozencraftJ.M., DunkinL.M., SylvesterC.S., MaconC.L., 2013. A review of US Army Corps of Engineers airborne coastal mapping in the Great Lakes. J. Great Lakes Res. 39, 194–204.

RoblesW., MadsenJ.D., MathurA., BruceL.M., 2006. Ground-truthed hyperspectral data for remote sensing of waterhyacinth. Proc. Southern Weed Science Soc. 59, 194.

RoblesW., MadsenJ.D., WersalR.M., 2010. Potential for remote sensing to detect and predict herbicide injury on waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Inv. Plant Sci. Manage. 3, 440–450.

SchottJ.R. 2007. Remote sensing: the image chain approach. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford.

SchowengerdtR.A. 2007. Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. Elsevier, Burlington, MA.

ShortN.M., RobinsonJ.W., 1999. Remote sensing and image interpretation and analysis. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.

SmartR.M., DickG.O., SnowJ.R., HonnellD.R., SmithD.H., SmithJ.K., 2009. Ecological effects of exotic and native aquatic vegetation. ERDC/EL TR-09-10. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.

SmithI.M., FiorinoG.E., GrabasG.P., WilcoxD.A. 2021. Wetland vegetation response to record-high Lake Ontario water levels. Journal of Great Lakes Research 47, 160-167.

SuirG.M., 2018. Sediment and Plant Dynamics in a Degrading Coastal Louisiana Landscape. Louisiana State University Doctoral Dissertations. 4504. Baton Rouge, LA.

SuirG.M., CarleM.M., HarrisJ.M., SasserC.E., SaltusC.L., 2020a. Raster-Based Floristic Quality Index: Proof of Concept. ERDC/EL TN20-1. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.

SuirG.M., SaltusC.L., SasserC.E., HarrisJ.M., ReifM.K., DiazR., GiffinG., 2020b. Evaluating ‘Drone Truthing’ as an Alternative to Ground Truthing: An Example with Wetland Plant Identification. APCRP Technical Notes Collection. ERDC TN-APCRP. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.

ThiagoS.F.S., CostaM.P.F., MelackJ.M., NovoE.M.L.M., 2008. Remote sensing of aquatic vegetation: theory and applications. Environ. Monit. Assess. 140, 131–145.

TinerRW. 1996. Technical aspects of wetlands: wetland definitions and classifications in the United States. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, Report: W, 2425.

VaccaroL., BedfordB.L., JohnstonC.A., 2009. Litter accumulation promotes dominance of invasive species of cattail (Typha spp.) in Lake Ontario wetlands. Wetlands 29, 1036–1048.

UzarskiD.G., BradyV.J., CooperM.J., WilcoxD.A., AlbertD.A., AxlerR.P., BostwickP., BrownT.N., CiborowskiJ.J., DanzN.P., GathmanJ.P., 2017. Standardized measures of coastal wetland condition: implementation at a Laurentian Great Lakes basin-wide scale. Wetlands, 37(1), pp.15-32.

VermaD., JanaA., 2019. LULC classification methodology based on simple Convolutional Neural Network to map complex urban forms at finer scale: Evidence from Mumbai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.09774.

VisC., HudonC., CarignanR., 2003. An evaluation of approaches used to determine the distribution and biomass of emergent and submerged aquatic macrophytes over large spatial scales. Aquatic Botany, Vol. 77, 187–201.

WilcoxD.A., BatemanJ.A., 2018. Photointerpretation analysis of plant communities in Lake Ontario wetlands following 65 years of lake-level regulation. J. Great Lakes Res. 44, 1306–1313.

WilcoxD.A., XieY., 2007. Predicting wetland plant community responses to proposed water-level-regulation plans for Lake Ontario: GIS-based modeling. J. Great Lakes Res. 33, 751–773.

WilcoxD.A., XieY., 2008. Predicted effects of proposed new regulation plans on sedge/ grass meadows of Lake Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res. 34, 745–754.

WilcoxD.A., IngramJ.W., KowalskiK.P., MeekerJ.E., CarlsonM.L., XieY., GrabasG.P., HolmesK.L., PattersonN.J., 2005. Evaluation of water-level regulation influences on Lake Ontario and Upper St. Lawrence River coastal wetland plant communities. Report to the International Joint Commission, Washington, DC and Ottawa, ON.

WilcoxD.A., KowalskiK.P., HoareH.L., CarlsonM.L., MorganH.N., 2008. Cattail invasion of sedge/grass meadows in Lake Ontario: photointerpretation analysis of sixteen wetlands over five decades. J. Great Lakes Res. 34, 301–323.

WozencraftJ.M., LillycropW.J., 2006. JALBTCX coastal mapping for the USACE. International hydrographic review 7(2), 28-37.

Published

2021-04-01